ROYALS IN REVIEW
There is an
old retort which many have heard or used which is: “who died and made you god?”
Having
listened to the recent report on Goldfish with the ‘Ambassador’, I was not
impressed with what I heard. So, I had
to ask myself … who died and made you god?
An ‘ambassador’ represents the interests of whoever sent him.
It was
reported on that interview that some, at least, of the old ‘royals’ have
stepped down and new controllers have been put in place. But the question should be asked … who died
and made them god? … these new
controllers or trustees? Who made them
god?
Who do these
new controllers represent? Are they not
of the same ‘royal’ families as the old controllers who have stepped down or
been replaced? Again: who died and made them god? Perhaps we are just looking at a succession
of one tyrant for JAT (Just Another Tyrant).
An
historical review of Europe and Asia is JAT for JAT ad nauseum. What was contemplated with a ‘new’ world
experience in North America was a break with that failed process. And the JAT system tried and tried to control
that. And they did succeed to a large
extent with the formation of the District of Columbia, a re-write of the
Constitution in 1871, the establishment of the Federal Reserve system in the
early 1900s, and the formulation of the United States, Inc., with a weaponized
organization, the IRS, to see to it that all people would bow the knee to the
JATs.
But now
there is a scramble for control. The
worldwide financial matrix of the royals is in shambles, and the ‘fixers’, the
‘other world-ers’ and the inter-dimensionals, have made major moves for the
correction. And it looks like the
‘royals’ are scrambling to retain control.
Hence the ‘posturing’ of the ‘ambassador’ for the JATs.
I have
followed with interest on the Goldfish Reports the comments by Mr. Winston
Shrout. Aside from the ‘tongue-in-cheek’
references to being a Hill Billy, having sifted through his comments about his
appointments and actions, there seems to emerge something new. He doesn’t appear to be a ‘royal’. Yet he was ‘gifted’ by this sole arbiter, Dr.
Ray C. Dam, who is a royal, with much authority. It is no wonder that the ‘cabal’ (another
name for the royal families) have attacked him.
He has no appearance of being JAT.
He is best known for his Solutions In Commerce which I have followed for
years. His knowledge is so deep that he
has to resort to teaching people how to deal with such mundane things as
traffic court just to make his points.
What is to
become of him? If the cabal has its way,
he will live out his life on the Isle
of Patmos … so to speak, and the JATs will usurp yet again. Maybe we’ll get another ‘Book of Revelations’
from Patmos.
And I have
been amused at all of this talk about money and debt. I did take high school physics, and remember
some of it. It seems there was something
about that matter could not be destroyed.
That was high school, but I never got into advanced physics about
‘anti-matter’, so I can’t comment on that.
But in this world that we live in, ‘matter’ is real, and ‘anti-matter’
has to be manufactured. So, we deal with
just matter … which can’t be destroyed.
So, can
wealth be destroyed by debt/anti-matter/anti-wealth? No, I don’t think it can be. Wealth is something which is created by the
work of men’s hands (man or men refers to all people, men and women). Even great art is by the artists hands. Concertos are created by a man’s hand. Gold is dug out of the ground by men’s labor,
and refined by … yes, the labor of men.
What is this
‘debt’ spoken of? Could it be just a
mechanism of non-producers to take and control the wealth of those who are the
producers?
Is ‘debt’
just a concept? And conversely, is the
‘forgiveness’ of ‘debt’ just a concept also?
Are people to laud these ‘royals’ who ‘forgive’ something which doesn’t
exist in the first place?
Okay, so how
did this wealth end up in the control of these royal families? Did they dig in the ground for gold, or
harvest the trees for lumber, or paint a Mona Lisa, or even write a
lullaby? If they did, I haven’t noticed
it.
So, why do
they get to decide what will become of the world’s wealth? Do they get to control the governments of the
world, which governments were put in place to protect the ‘god given’ rights of
people. Or was all that stuff in high
school social studies just bunk?
The painting
called Mona Lisa … what is its cash value?
Well, probably a few shekels worth of canvas and paint were spent. An artist worked on it for perhaps 100 hours
at let’s say 10 shekels per hour. So,
the final product is valued in monetary terms as 1,100 shekels. But people really liked that painting so it
was bought and sold many times over.
Perhaps it raised in value to a million shekels, and then sold again for
5 million shekels, and then resold for 10 million shekels, and on and on.
The original
artist who actually created that painting was reimbursed 1,100 shekels and the
local folks could come and see it for free.
Now that it is ‘worth’ 10 million shekels, the insurance companies say
it has to be locked in a vault for safety, and … the poor people will never see
it again. Oh sure, the wealthy can get a
ticket to see it.
The wealthy
elite have stolen what belongs to the people by hanging a value of 10 million
shekels on that painting. Is it worth 10
million or 1,100? Truly it is worth what
the artist paid for supplies and the time it took to ‘create’ it. That is the true monetary value of it, but
now the wealthy say it is worth several millions more and have locked it away.
Is this
‘how’ the royal families have come into control of the world’s wealth?
Do we want
more of that?
Are we going
to have JAT?
How about
the JAT get a JOB?
Just a
thought.
Thank you
Louisa for the Goldfish Reports. We all
appreciate the ‘enlightenment’ that you have so generously provided for us.
Anonymous
