Monday, April 20, 2020

REMARKS BY PRESIDENT TRUMP, VICE PRESIDENT PENCE, AND MEMBERS OF THE CORONAVIRUS TASK FORCE IN PRESS BRIEFING James S. Brady Press Briefing Room April 19, 2020

Office of the Press Secretary
REMARKS BY PRESIDENT TRUMP,
VICE PRESIDENT PENCE,
AND MEMBERS OF THE CORONAVIRUS TASK FORCE
IN PRESS BRIEFING

James S. Brady Press Briefing Room

April 19, 2020

6:28 P.M. EDT

THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you very much.  I'd like to begin by saying that we're continuing to negotiate with the Democrats to get our great workers and small businesses all over the country taken care of.  I think we -- we’re getting close to a deal.  It could happen.  It could happen.  A lot of good work has been going on, and we could have an answer tomorrow.  And we're going to see what -- what exactly does take place.

We're also looking at helping our hospitals and our rural hospitals, who have been hurt very badly.  The rural hospitals, for a long time, have not been treated properly.  We're looking to help them, and beyond.  So we're looking at hospitals also, as part of the package.  And we'll see how that all comes out.

But a lot of good things are happening.  Some very good negotiations.  I just got off the phone with the Secretary of the Treasury, and we have some very good negotiations going on right now.  And I think you could have a nice answer tomorrow, but we'll see.

America continues to make steady progress in our war against the virus.  As of today, we've tested 4.18 million Americans.  That's a record anywhere in the world.  The United States has now conducted more total tests than all of the following nations combined: France, the United Kingdom, South Korea, Japan, Singapore, India, Austria, Australia, Sweden, and Canada.

And our testing is expanding very rapidly by millions and millions of people.  So we've -- we've done more testing than all of these countries combined: France, United Kingdom, South Korea, Japan, Singapore, India, Austria, and Australia, Sweden, and Canada.  That’s something.  Right?

We're doing a great job.  We’re -- we are.  This team is an incredible team, and that includes Army Corps of Engineers, a lot of our military people, our admirals, our generals.  Got one of our great admirals here, who’s done an incredible job.  You haven't slept too much in the last two months either.  Look at him.  (Laughs.)

ADMIRAL GIROIR:  No, sir.

THE PRESIDENT:  That’s -- somebody said to me, “President, you look tired.”  I said, “I should be tired.”  We should all be tired.  But we have to win, right?

ADMIRAL GIROIR:  Yes, sir.

THE PRESIDENT:  Tomorrow, the President -- the Vice President will lead a call with our nation's governors from FEMA headquarters, Mike --

THE VICE PRESIDENT:  Yes, sir.

THE PRESIDENT:  -- to review what more they can do and do together to develop locally tailored testing strategies.  Working very hard with governors now on testing.  We want to help them out.

Before the call, we’ll send them a full list of all of the large laboratory machines in the states.  They have a lot of machinery in the states that some aren’t that aware of, but they're there, and they’re really high-quality machines, by the way.  And the potential capacity of those machines, if they're fully utilized -- a couple of them didn't know that they could be utilized in a different manner.  They're only up to 10 percent, and they can go 90 percent more.

Many governors are still relying on their state laboratories rather than the full and much larger capacity that is available to them.  As an example, commercial laboratories, such as Quest and LabCorp -- these are massive laboratories that can handle a lot more than they're being sent.  A few days ago, it was at 30 percent.  They’re only at 30 percent capacity now.  I don't know -- probably the same, but they have a lot of capacity.

In addition, academic laboratories, big research labs -- there’s tremendous capacity out there.  And some of them want the fast -- you know, the instant Abbott machine, which just came about due to the research during this little short period of time.  And it's very quick, but these labs can do them very quickly also, and they're -- they're massive.  They can handle much more -- much more than the machine, the small machine, can handle.

We continue to procure millions of swabs, test collectors.  I have something here.  Just happen to have it.  It’s a swab.  It looks innocent.  Not very complicated.  Anybody like to see what it looks like?  Should I open it?  Does everybody?

Q    Open it up.

Q    Yes, please.

THE PRESIDENT:  “Open it up.”  I will.  I will.  This is what it's about.  Right?  Is it -- does it remind you of something?  It reminds you of this, right?  One is a swab and one is a Q-tip.  It's actually different.  It's very sophisticated, actually.  But it's a little bit like -- so this is the swab.

And we've ordered a lot of them.  They have a lot of them.  Some of them -- some of the states -- they were shipped to states, and the states don't know where they are.  And -- but that's -- that's it.

Why don't we give this to Karen?  Perhaps she'll take an extra test.  (Laughs.)  Right?

But this is a big deal.  And we're working on it, and we're working with the companies.  And I think, in the end, we're going to have -- we’re going to have -- we’re going to have a tremendous -- a tremendous success.

No -- nobody is close to us.  No country is close to us.  In fact -- and I appreciate it very much -- the Wall Street Journal wrote a fantastic piece, a highly respected gentleman: Christopher DeMuth.  And this piece was just in the Wall Street Journal Weekend Edition.  And “Trump Rewrites the Book on Emergencies.”  That's what's happened too.  And we -- I’ll just read one paragraph:

“He's given pride of place to federalism and private enterprise, lauding the patriotism and proficiency of our fantastic governors and mayors” -- meaning, I do call them fantastic when it's appropriate -- “and our incredible business leaders and genius companies.”  I guess I probably use those terms too, when they're doing a good job.  When they're not doing a good job, I don't use those terms.

“Our heroic doctors and nurses and orderlies and our tremendous truckers” -- they have all done good jobs -- “by shouting out many of them by name and documenting their deeds on a fully daily basis, he has vivified the American way in action (once [it was] reluctantly aroused).”  It was hard to get it aroused, and it is hard to get it aroused, but we got it aroused.  “When asked why he has not issued orders for nationwide home and business lockdowns, he has emphasized that the intensity of the epidemic varies widely and is best met by calibrated state and local judgments.”  That's the judgments of governors and local people.  And added pointedly that “such steps would conflict with the Constitution.”

But very importantly, he's just a very respected gentleman.  To see this was a very nice feeling -- not for me, necessarily, but for all of the people that have worked with us.  I mean, they've -- they have worked so hard.

And we've developed tests that are so fantastic.  We've -- we've come up with things that nobody had ever heard of, and we did it during -- during this pandemic.  We did it under pressure.  It's called “reaction under pressure.”  It's pretty amazing what our people have done.  And that includes all of our military people, and our CDC -- just about everybody you can imagine -- including Tony and Deborah.  And they’ve worked long hours.  There’s nobody that's getting a lot of sleep.

We're close to finalizing -- I want to thank the writer, Christopher, of this article, and it's a great article.  That was, frankly -- at least of what I read, it was a great article.  We appreciate it.

We're close to finalizing the second partnership through which a U.S. manufacturer would convert its existing plant to produce over 10 million additional swabs per month.  And we should be ready to announce this in a very short period of time.

We also are going to be using, and we're preparing to use, the Defense Production Act to increase swab production in one U.S. facility by over 20 million additional swabs per month.

We've had a little difficulty with one, so we're going to call in -- as we have in the past, as you know -- we're calling in the Defense Production Act, and we'll be getting the swabs, very easily.  Swabs are easy.  Ventilators are hard.  Ventilators are a big deal, and we are now the king of ventilators.  We have so many ventilators.  You know, I said nobody that needed a ventilator has been turned down.  It's pretty amazing.  Nobody.

We're working with the world-class team at Oak Ridge National Laboratory to use its injection-molding capacity to potentially produce over 10 million collection tubes per week.  That’s tremendous numbers.

In the meantime, the Supply Chain and Logistics Task Force continues to surge testing and needed supplies all throughout America.  Mike's team and the task force, they just met; they've been meeting virtually every day.  And it's a great team.  Right?  It's a great team.  They've been doing a great job, Mike.  You've been doing a great job.

THE VICE PRESIDENT:  They are.

THE PRESIDENT:  Many governors are doing this incredible work, and they're working with us very closely on testing and working in their states.  And again, it should be a local thing because it's point.  It’s all these points within a state.  But we're helping them a lot, and we want to help them a lot.  We're going to help them more than a lot, actually, if you think about it, with what we've done.  Think of it: We've done more than all those countries combined.

We're encouraging them to share their successful strategies with other governors.  Some of the governors are doing a better job than others.  The robust capacity that we've brought online will empower governors to deploy sophisticated strategies so they can safely reopen their states.

Some people believe in testing very strongly, and other people believe in it less strongly.  But still, it's a very good thing to have.  I think we can say that.  Some people believe in it like they can't exist without testing, and other people don't believe in it nearly as much.  They can see how they're doing, and they feel how they're doing.  And they've been pretty vocal about that.  I think you know pretty much who I'm talking about.  But I believe if they want it, we should give it to them and get it get it for them and work with them.

You must remember that the governors wanted to have total control over the opening of their states, but now they want to have us, the federal government, do the testing.  And again, testing is local.  You can't have it both ways.  Testing is a local thing.  And it's very important.  It's great.  But it's a local thing.  And we're going to get -- we're going to get it done to a level in a very short period of time, because all of these -- all the swabs are coming in, all of the necessary materials.  A lot of them, as I said, are already there, but a lot of people don't know that yet.

But we'll be doing testing at a level -- already, we're doing testing at a level nobody has ever done before, but we'll be doing testing at a level that the biggest tester in the world will be very happy, very soon.  And it is -- it's very much like ventilators.  You don't hear the word mentioned, and that's much tougher -- much tougher -- when you have to build these machines.  We built thousands of machines.

We’ll more than help the governors, and we'll make sure that everything goes well, just like it did with ventilators; just, frankly, like it did with face masks -- on a much easier subject, the face masks.  Again, everything is easier than a ventilator.  Ventilators are tough.

But, now, I spoke yesterday with the President of Mexico and with various other countries.  We're going to be helping them with ventilators.  We have tremendous numbers of ventilators.

In fact, I -- I hear -- I understand that Governor Cuomo is going to be sending up to Massachusetts some of the excess ventilators that we were able to get, and that's great.  I think that's a great thing.

The number of new hospital admissions is also significantly down.  When you look at these numbers, it's a good thing to see -- other than the fact that we also know how people have been just ravaged by this -- by this curse, by this horrible scourge, plague, call it -- it’s got many different names.  In many of the hotspots, including a 50 percent decline over a nine-day period in New York City.  That's a fantastic decline.  It's a beautiful thing to see after going through the opposite.

We continue to see improvement with declining trajectory of cases in Seattle, Detroit, New Orleans, Indianapolis, and Houston metro areas.  More evidence that our aggressive strategy is working.  And I thank the American people for their selfless devotion.  The American people have done a hell of a job.  We’re saving countless lives, though.

And again, I'll say it -- because I always wanted to say, “Well, can you leave it open?”  Nobody ever heard of anything like this.  Not since 1917, more than 100 years ago, has anything like this happened.  And in those days, they had no real communication so you couldn't say, “Go inside.  Don't…”  You know, people just died.  Almost 100 million people, it's reported.  It's tough.

So, you know, the American people, what they've done is -- is incredible.  And they've learned a lot, you know.  You see people picketing a little bit, and they want to get out.  They want to get out and get back with their lives, and that's good.  But they have learned a lot.  They've learned about distancing, even now, at least until this thing totally goes away.  They've learned about their washing their hands and all of the different things that we've been talking about ad nauseam for so long.  And they get it.  They get it.

In some places, the governors are ready to go; in other places, they can't go yet, and they won't go.  They want to -- they have to have it safe.  I want it to be safe too.  It has to be safe.

And again, I have to say this.  I can't emphasize it strongly enough.  I'm probably going to show you charts of some of the countries that are really having trouble, and one in particular is having a massive problem, where they said, “Let's go.  We're just going to keep going.”  Well, they're the lines that you're -- we’re famous for now.  Some are flat and some are up.

This is like a rocket ship.  This country is -- and they didn't.  They decided, “Let's go and let's wing it.”  It's -- you know, they thought it was okay, but it's -- it's a problem.  It’s a big problem.

And there's another couple.  There's one in particular that everybody thinks did it, but the people are staying in.  Okay?  You know, the head of a country doesn't have to say “stay in.”  These people are smart people.  They know what's going on.  They see what's going on.  So they don't have to say.  They can say they’re not doing that, but the people are staying inside.  There are not a lot of people outside sitting at cafes, despite what the mode of a country is.

But if you look at Europe, most countries have done this.  A couple tried not to.  Italy tried not to, and they held it.  And Spain tried not to; they went that way.  France tried not to.  I mean, nobody wants to do this.  It's a brutal step.  “We're going to close down your country.”  Who ever heard of a thing like this?

But we would have had millions of people die if we didn't do this.  Millions of people.  And I believe that, Mike.  I think -- you know, in looking at things that we've been looking at over the last couple of days, I think -- and, really, over the last couple of weeks -- from the time we did it, shortly thereafter I said we made the right decision in closing down.  We made the right decision on borders, banning people coming in from China; banning, ultimately, people coming in from Europe.

But we would have had millions of deaths instead of -- it looks like we'll be at about a 60,000 mark, which is 40,000 less than the lowest number thought of.

So this isn't a case where people would say, “Oh, we would have had that number.  It's similar to a flu.”  It's not the same thing as the flu at all, because if we wouldn't have done anything, you would have had -- so a flu would have 35, and that goes from 27 to 35, 40, 50 sometimes.  It's over a long period of time.  Much different.  It's even a much different death, to be honest.  It's a much different death.  This is violent.

CMS is finalizing new guidelines for doctors and patients to resume elective surgeries.  It's a big thing.  A lot of hospitals were closed.  They couldn't do any elective surgeries.  They'll be able to start doing that.  Procedures and medical care that needs to be done in person -- as long as the rate of infections remains low in a community, we want patients to be able to go to the doctors, get clinically tested, and have work done, surgeries, receive treatment for chronic conditions, and resume preventative care.  So we'll be allowing that to happen very soon.

We had no capacity in the hospitals with what happened with the -- with the plague.  We had no capacity to do it.  If your doctor believes you need a treatment in person, you can get a treatment now.  You can and should get a treatment now.

We are asking that healthcare facilities have plans in place to keep patients safe during their visit.  Some places like New York, New Jersey, where they really got hit hard, it's going to be a little bit tougher.  They've done a great job, but they really were a center.  I mean, they were a center.  I was watching that; it was incredible.  But now they're -- they're leveling off, and I think there'll be coming down very soon.

Administrator Seema Verma will be telling you a little bit more about it.  Mike is going to say a few words.  Seema will then speak and tell you a little bit more about that.

My administration continues to execute our massive military operation to supply our hospitals with equipment they need, and beds, if necessary.  But it looks like we're totally covered on beds.  We have plenty of beds.  It's highly unlikely -- that would be bad news if we needed more beds.  But it looks like it's going just the opposite direction.

I want to thank Governor Cuomo -- the relationship there -- for this whole thing.  We're building hospitals.  It was very good.  We built a little bit more than we needed, and that's good, as opposed to building a little bit less.  That's not good.  But he's worked very well with us.

The governor of Louisiana has been great on the bed -- on that whole situation with the beds.

Frankly, the governor of Michigan was very good with us on -- on beds.  You know, it's a very complex subject.  You need buildings or you have to do tents, or you have to do a lot of different things, a lot of different ways.

But the Army Corps of Engineers was fantastic.  They were fantastic.

Florida likewise -- Governor DeSantis.  And I could name probably six other locations.

I'll tell you one: California was fantastic.  He was really good.  He was really good.  And I appreciate the fact that he -- he said what he wanted to say, and he wasn't letting the press force him into saying something that he didn't want to say.  So I appreciate it very much.  Governor of California.  He really -- he worked very hard.  We worked together, and he worked very hard.

The federal government is currently procuring more than 100,000 ventilators through new production or purchases, with thousands already delivered.  We've delivered thousands of brand-new ventilators all throughout the country.  New York would be, I guess, the biggest user.  And they are now taking some of their excess ventilators, which is great, and they're sending them up to Massachusetts.  I think it's 400.  And that's -- that's a great thing.

Our total supply of ventilators continues to exceed, by a lot, total expected demand.  Governor Cuomo said today that no one who needed a ventilator was denied a ventilator.  That's a beautiful statement, I appreciate it.  And all governors are in that same position.

We do have a clip that I thought would be appropriate to put up today.  It’ll take two minutes, and I think you'll find it interesting.  But we appreciate it.

And let's see if we can do that.  You'll turn out the lights, and we'll see if we can do that.  Thank you.

(A video is played.)

We actually had something else.  Are they finished with it?  They left out the good part.  Great -- great job, fellas.

Q    What was the good part?

THE PRESIDENT:  They did a better job on ventilators.  No -- Andrew had something else to say that was really nice, but we won't go through that.  But he really -- I mean, it was really a good statement.

Do you want to put the rest of it up, or do you not have it?

I just think it's so good because it's bipartisan.  You know, this is not about Democrats, Republicans.  This is about a thing that hit our country, the likes of which has never happened to us before.  Wars -- those wars, Civil War.  Sure.  The First World War, the Second World War -- they’re not fought on this country.  This is being fought on this country.  But it's being fought in 184 countries all over the world.  It's terrible.

But I want to thank Andrew -- Governor Cuomo -- for the statement.  He actually -- if you go a little bit further, it was -- it was even far beyond even that.  So that was great.  Do you remember?

THE VICE PRESIDENT:  Should we run it again?

ADMINISTRATOR VERMA:  They’re getting it to work --

THE PRESIDENT:  Huh?

ADMINISTRATOR VERMA:  They’re going to try to work on getting the first part of that.

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, that’s okay.  Whatever.  But it’s -- it’s -- he said some really good things.  And that’s -- it makes people feel good.  It’s -- actually, the Wall Street Journal -- Christopher was saying, “I want to make people feel good too.”  I want to make -- when they're doing a good job, I want to make people feel good.  I want the Admiral to feel good.  He's worked so hard.  Mike has worked so hard.

And it was -- it was very nice.  You know, it was on this morning.  It was all -- it was Andrew this morning.  It’s -- it's a little longer clip than that.  But you'll see it was, really, a very nice thing that he said.  And people really appreciate that because they've done a great job.  The federal government has done a great job.  I mean, we -- with all of it.  And this is easy.  The swabs are -- that's easy.  We have them coming by the tens of millions.  We have them coming at a level that -- you'll have so many swabs you won't know what to do with them.  That's easy.

So they'll all -- they'll all be there.  A lot of them are there already.  They're learning about their testing capacity that they didn't know about that -- that we have in the various labs, including academic, they have to remember.  You have a lot of these big colleges that have labs that are totally ready to help.  But I want to thank the Dynamic Ventilator Reserve, because what they've done is incredible.  That's a capital D-V-R, by the way, an innovative public-private partnership.  That's what we created.

We're gaining access to up to 65,000 additional ventilators and hospitals across the nation that can be redeployed very quickly to areas with the greatest need when they're not in use.  And we, right now, have almost 10,000 in our reserve.  We've been able to give away thousands, like we helped Andrew or we helped fill.  And New Jersey is doing a great job.  Andrew will tell you that too.  They have a very good relationship, working together and working with us.

But we have -- now we're back up to almost 10,000, and this is after giving away tens of thousands of ventilators.  And we're going to fill up the reserves of states.  We're going to work with them, so in case this happens again.

But we're also going to help other countries.  I was telling you, the President of Mexico -- we're going to be sending a pretty large quantity to Mexico -- they very much need them -- and to other countries where they need them.  We've had -- I've had about six calls with leaders of other countries, and they need them.  And they’re hard to -- they’re hard to get done.

We did -- was our companies stepped up, and they did an incredible job.  Some of them were automobile companies, and they’d take an assembly line and they’d say, “Guess what?  We're making ventilators now for a while.”

But because of the historic steps that we've taken, I remain confident that every American who needs any of this equipment -- any of the things we're talking about -- we'll either have it now, already has it, or we’ll shortly have it.

Through the Project Airbridge, we've completed 64 flights carrying over 600 million pieces of personal protective equipment, such as gloves, gowns, and other medical gear, with 50 more flights scheduled in the very near future.

The team doing that is an incredible team of military people and young geniuses.  Some are older geniuses, but mostly younger geniuses, I think I can say.  Some people that made vast amounts of money in Silicon Valley.  You know, these are very smart people.  The job they've done is incredible.  And I said, “Where do you come from?”  “Well, I sold my company, sir.”  “Oh, really?  How much did you get?”  I think he said $700 million.  I said, “That's good.  You want to work for the government?”  No, I want to help our country, sir.  And it's tremendous brainpower.  It's a beautiful thing to see.

Young, incredible people that love this country, and they worked with the military.  Admiral, you would say they were pretty smart, right?

ADMIRAL GIROIR:  Yes, sir,

THE PRESIDENT:  They were in the upper scales of IQ?

ADMIRAL GIROIR:  Yes, sir.

THE PRESIDENT:  They were the upper.  They were the -- they were the top scale, I'll tell you.  And they're great people.

But FEMA is working to commit another $384 million to produce another 64 million gowns for healthcare.  These are the highest quality, where they're very safe.  When you put them on, they're safe.  Very important.  The quality of the gown is very important.  People in different places, different countries, they're wearing gowns with cuts in them.  And these are very safe.

I want to thank America's textile manufacturers for their partnership in this remarkable undertaking.  Two U.S. companies, Hanes and Standard Textile, are on track to produce 5 million gowns by the end of the month.  And that's really moving.  That's really moving.  Two great companies.  You know those companies.

Another great American company, Honeywell, recently began manufacturing N95 masks in Rhode Island, where they converted a factory in less than five weeks instead of the nine months it was normally expected to take.  So they've already done it, and they did it so rapidly.  Five weeks instead of nine months.

It's amazing the spirit of this country.  It's really about the spirit of the country.  We said, “Do it.  Do it fast.”  But they did it in -- and this is -- this was a major conversion too.  This is a different world.

Honeywell is hiring more than 1,000 American workers to produce 20 million masks per month.  Twenty million masks a month.  Thanks to the Defense Production Act, we'll be receiving another 40 million masks over the next few weeks.

And I also want to thank 3M because they really stepped up.  We had a little dispute at the beginning, but that got worked out quickly, and they've been doing a great job -- 3M.  They really have been.  I want to thank their great CEO.  We -- we had a little skirmish, but it worked out well.  And they're doing a lot of work right now on masks and other things.

This production is in addition to the 55 million N95 masks my administration has already distributed.  Plus, we ordered -- and it’s coming in soon -- 500 million masks.  You would think, “What are you going to do with them?”  They get used rapidly.

In addition to that, as you know, we sterilize masks now.  A great company in Ohio recommended by the governor of Ohio, strongly.  And it's doing very well, and they're sterilizing.  A lot of the masks can be sterilized up to 20 times, so that's like buying 20 masks.  And I always wondered, “Why aren't they sterilizing these masks?”  They’re pretty -- some of them are pretty sophisticated masks.  And some you can't, because of the material; others you can.

But we have actually two companies that do this, but one company I know very well in Ohio, and they're doing a great job.  So they’re sterilizing masks.  Up to 20 times you can sterilize a certain type of mask.

To these numbers in perspective -- and to put them into perspective, American healthcare providers use an estimated 25 million N95 masks nationwide in a typical year.  So, a typical year: 25 million.  That means we've secured nearly four times as many N95 masks in recent weeks as we would an entire healthcare industry during a typical year.  Over a matter of a couple of weeks, we had more masks than we would do in a year.  Think of that.  Over a couple of weeks.

Moreover, we're bringing supply chains back home, and we've learned a lot about supply chains.  We've learned that it’s nice to make things in the U.S.  I've been saying that for a long time.  One of the reasons I ran for office -- because we started making things everywhere but here.  And if one thing comes out of this, more than anything else, is that we should make product in the United States.

And these supply chains, they sound wonderful, but if one country has a problem, the whole chain is ruined.  And I've been saying it for a long time.  I ran partially on that.  I ran partially on that.  I ran on that, and I ran very strongly against China.  And then we made a great trade deal where they buy $250 billion.  They're supposed to.  And they’re paying tariffs.  They paid us tens of billions of dollars.  I've given $12 billion one year, $16 billion another year, and $19 billion to our farmers and ranchers who were targeted.

But, you know, I ran on China and other countries, the way they were ripping us off.  They were ripping off our country.  And China understood that.  I mean, China fully understood that.  And they’re big, strong, smart people.  And I wasn't friendly, and it wasn't a friendly situation.  And we ended up making an incredible deal with China for tens of billions of dollars of product: $40- to $50 billion to the farmers.  The most they ever spent was 15 to 16; now they’re supposed to spend 40 to 50.

Now, of course, the -- the virus came along, and I'm not happy.  I'm not happy.  And I let him know I'm not happy.  So, you know, we had a great relationship with -- we had a very bad relationship with China.  Then we had a good relationship, because we made a great deal.

But we're not happy.  This is not a good thing that happened.  It came out of China, so we're not -- we're not in a position where we're going to say much yet.

But the deal itself is great.  The deal is -- it's going to put many, many people to work in our country.  But all of that has to be taken into account when you look at all of the people that are dying in our country, but all over the world -- all over the world.  People are dying.

I had a G7 call and their economies are in tatters.  They're shattered, the G7 countries.  You have Japan and Germany and France, and the different countries.  Italy -- look at what happened to Italy.  Look at what happened to these countries.  Look at what happened to Spain.  Look what happened to Spain, how -- how incredible.  It's just been shattered.  And so many other countries are shattered.

So nobody ever thought this could have happened, a thing like this.  It's very, very sad.

But if we've learned something, it's about supply chains.  I just saw yesterday where, when the auto industry gets back, they have a problem because there's a supply chain going through a different country.  And this has been going on over for years, for decades.  I always said it was no good.  Why don't -- why don't we make it -- why do you need a supply chain?  Make -- very simple: Make you parts here.  They get one part from this country and one part from that country.  It's all over the place.  The problem is if one country has a problem, you have no car, or whatever it is you're making.

So we've learned a good lesson.  I think a lot of smart people knew that before.  But we've distributed many hundreds of millions of masks.

This pandemic has underscored the vital importance of reshoring our supply chains and bringing them back into the United States, where they belong, where they should have never left.  What happens if you're in a war and you have a supply chain where half of your supplies are given to you by other countries?  Who -- who are the people that thought of this?  These are globalists.  It doesn't work.  It certainly doesn't work during rough times, bad times, or dangerous times.

So we're going to continue to fight the virus.  We're talking to China.  We spoke to them a long time ago about going in.  We want to go in; we want to see what's going on.  And we weren't exactly invited, I can tell you that.

If you look at some of the investigations that are going on in terms of World Health Organization -- and I'll take it a step further: the World Trade Organization, too.  World Trade.  We -- we did years ago -- years ago, many years ago -- the World Trade Organization.  From the day China came in, that's when China bloomed.  They were mainlining it, and then, boom, they were up like a rocket ship because they took advantage of every little ridiculous clause in the World Trade Organization documents.

They were a developing nation.  China was a developing nation.  They make the cars.  They make the plant.  They make everything.  They make everything.  And they're a developing nation.

So we've had -- I might have gotten elected, to a certain extent, because of China and other countries.  One of my big things was trade.  The United States is getting ripped off on trade.

Now Japan is paying $40 billion and buying a lot.  That’s before we even do the deal.  U.S.-Mexico was a great deal.  The NAFTA was one of the worst deals ever made in trade -- in trade history.  And I would also put the World Trade Organization in that same group.

So I was very tough on these countries.  With China, we made the deal, and we became friendly.  But then this happened, and this is -- this is tantamount.  This is something that's really incredible.

I do want to read the -- something that I just saw today on television.  I was looking and I just said, “That's an interesting statement.”  We talked about the Democrats, and it was a statement made by Bret Baier -- a good guy, smart.  “On February 19, there was a Democratic debate in Las Vegas.”  That was February 19.  That's way after I closed entrance from China into our country.

So, Bret goes: “On February 19, there was a Democratic debate in Las Vegas.  Three words weren't said during the debate: virus, coronavirus, or COVID-19.  Those three words never came up.”

That was -- I just thought it was very interesting, because, you know, you hear these people -- some of the people -- the Democrats said “Oh, this, that.”  It never even was a part of their dialogue.  Now they bring it up because you see what happened.  So now -- but they didn't bring it up, but I brought it up.  I brought it up a long time before I made the trade deal.  And I was not easy to deal with.  I was not easy to deal with.  They understand that.

We still have 25 percent on $250 billion that they have to pay us.  And it's a lot of money.  We've taken in a lot of money, and we've had a lot of beneficiaries, including our farmers and ranchers.

So, in addition, we've launched an unprecedented effort to develop new treatments and therapies to battle the plague.  Therapies, to me, are the most exciting.  The vaccines are obviously so important, but the therapies are immediate, you know.  And we have some things that are really looking good.  Really looking good.  We call it: COVID Treatment Acceleration Program.  We're accelerating all of these great companies that are looking, and we have government agencies looking too -- NIH.

This extraordinary program is slashing red tape to speed in development and to rival and -- if you look at -- if you look at what we're doing in terms of the speed, it's unrivaled.  It's totally unrivaled.  There's never been anything like it.  The FDA and Dr. Stephen Hahn -- a highly respected man from a great institution -- left that job to come here.  The job he's doing is incredible.  And we're working with Scott, his predecessor, who’s terrific.  We're working with a lot of people.

But the speed of development for antiviral, antibody, and immune therapies is at a level that nobody thought even possible.  And I will say this: We’re getting very good results.  It's a little soon yet.  But if we could find the therapies, that would solve the problem.  If somebody has a problem, we can get it taken care of, so it's not so devastating as it has been.

With that, I'm going to ask Vice President Pence to come up.  And I have to say it's a Sunday -- a Sunday evening -- and this man has not stopped.  He's working -- we all are, in all fairness -- but he’s been working with his task force and everyone else around the clock for months.

And I just want to thank Mike.  Thank you, Mike.

THE VICE PRESIDENT:  Thank you, Mr. President.  And let me echo your words about all the dedicated men and women on the White House Coronavirus Task Force, and the team that you assembled in January, some of whom are with us today: Seema Verma with CMS, Admiral Giroir with the U.S. Public Health Service, Dr. Steve Hahn of the FDA, and others represent a level of commitment and dedication.  It’s been inspiring for me to have the privilege to work with.  And so I thank you for your gracious words.

That White House Coronavirus Task Force met today.  It was reported to us that, at this moment, more than 746,000 Americans have tested positive for the coronavirus.  Fortunately, more than 68,000 Americans have fully recovered.  But sadly, more than 41,000 Americans have lost their lives to the coronavirus.

And we always want to express our deepest sympathies to the families in their loss, as well as to all the families who have loved ones that are struggling with this disease.

Today, we've seen encouraging news again about our progress as a nation.  President Trump reflected on those momentarily.  But the coronavirus White House Task Force today learned that our large metro areas continue to stabilize and even see progress.

The New York metro area, including New Jersey, New York, Long Island, Connecticut, and Rhode Island all appear to be past their peak.  The Detroit metro area also appears to be past its peak and is stable.  New Orleans metro area actually is the most stable of all areas where we had a major metropolitan outbreak.  And the Denver metro area is stable.  We're dealing in Colorado with a meatpacking plant issue.  And, of course, California and Washington remain low and steady.

Areas that we continue to watch carefully on the task force include the Chicago metro area, Boston metro, and the Philadelphia metropolitan area.

The progress that we are making is a tribute to the -- the American people.  It's a tribute to state and local leaders in all of these areas and the partnership that our President has forged.

But we just want to encourage every American, as we see this progress, to continue to heed your state and local authorities.  I think the American people know no one wants to reopen America more than President Donald Trump.  But I want to assure you we're going to continue to work with governors of every state, with the President's Guidelines for Opening Up America Again.  And we're going to work in a way that we can consolidate the progress that we have made and help move our states toward reopening our country.

We also received a report today -- and the coronavirus task force, at this point: 5,528 military personnel have been deployed across 24 hospitals and facilities, and 28,700 National Guard are on duty.

On the subject of supplies, the President spoke about this at length, but at the present moment, we have more than 9,055 ventilators on hand.  We actually added 91 ventilators to that supply because of the production that the President and our task force at FEMA has activated.  And in the next seven days, we'll be adding 576 ventilators to the Strategic National Stockpile.

As the President mentioned, our Airbridge continues to work: 64 flights completed, with 50 more flights on the horizon, literally bringing in medical equipment from around the country and around the world and deploying it to critical areas.

Finally, tomorrow, as the President announced, we'll be hosting a conference call with all of the nation's governors, all the states and territories, from the headquarters at FEMA.  And we'll be working with the governors to ensure them that we're -- we're helping them to review and evaluate the President's Guidelines for Opening Up America Again -- the criteria that we believe is appropriate and necessary -- before states can move into any phase one change in the mitigation strategies.

But also, at the President's direction tomorrow, we'll be providing all the nation's governors and all of their health officials with detail about the testing infrastructure that exists all around the country.  We'll be specifically providing governors and state health officials with information about all of the lab capability that exists in their states.  And also, we'll be updating them on our efforts to identify the kind of supplies the President just held up in our efforts to make sure that those supplies are at -- at all of those laboratories, as the need should arise.

Remember that, a month ago, we had done 80,000 coronavirus tests in America.  This weekend, we cleared more than 4 million.  And we're currently testing more than a million Americans a week.  We fully expect to actually have tested more than 5 million Americans before the end of this month.

But at the President's urging, we're going to continue to scale that testing and then work with governors to make sure that they can manage and implement and deploy that testing in the manner that will most support their efforts to move their states forward.

Remember that the testing that is contemplated in the Guidelines for Opening Up America Again, for phase one, are testing people that have symptoms that may be coronavirus, and then also having the testing resources to deploy to vulnerable communities: nursing homes or other vulnerable communities that we have identified as needing additional --what is called “monitoring” or “surveillance testing.

We believe we have the testing today around the country that would allow any state in America to move into phase one if they've met the other criteria: fourteen days of consistent declines and strong hospital capacity, so that their system would not be overwhelmed in the event of a flare-up.

But we're going to be working with governors tomorrow on the subject of testing and supplies.  And as the President said again this evening: We’re here to help.  We've forged a partnership with governors around the country, and tomorrow we'll be building on that partnership to hopefully arrive at the day that we can make sure governors around the nation have the best advice and the best resources to put America back to work.

Thank you, Mr. President.

THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you.  Very good.

Is Seema here?  Seema, you’ve done such a great job.  Please, come up and say a couple of words.  Thank you.

ADMINISTRATOR VERMA:  Thank you, Mr. Vice President and Mr. President.  So, just a few weeks ago, we stood here and asked the American healthcare system to delay elective surgeries and procedures.  And the reason why we did this is we wanted to make sure that the healthcare system could deal with any surges.  We wanted to preserve equipment and make sure that they had the appropriate workforce to handle any surge.  And our healthcare system did a fantastic job.  They very quickly stood up telehealth services.  And under the President's leadership, we started paying for these services under the Medicare program.

But the reality is, not everything can be addressed by telehealth.  And maybe a woman that needs surgery for breast cancer, somebody who has cataracts in their eyes that need to be able to see better, and sometimes the doctor just needs to be able to listen to their patient’s heart.  We've heard across the country that doctors’ offices have closed and many healthcare systems are furloughing their staff, nurses and doctors.

Under the President's leadership, we’ve put out over $90 billion in accelerated payments under the Medicare program, provided $30 billion of grants, with more dollars on the way.

But thanks to the American people, we are in a much different place.  You heard from the Vice President that there are many places around the country where they're seeing a decline in cases.  And hospitals are reporting that they have unused capacity.

And so, as part of our opening up America, we are issuing guidelines today about how we can reopen the healthcare system.  So these are recommendations around phase one.

Now, every state and local official has to assess the situation on the ground.  They need to make sure that they can still address surges.  They need to make sure that they have adequate supplies and a plan for conserving supplies.  They need to be able to screen patients and healthcare workers for COVID virus.  And they need to make sure that patients feel safe when they come in to seek healthcare services by assuring that they have the appropriate cleaning in place and that they observe social distancing inside the healthcare facilities.

And this isn't going to be like a light switch.  It's more like a sunrise, where it's going to be a gradual process.  And healthcare officials across the country and healthcare systems need to decide what services should be made available.  And, ultimately, doctors and patients need to make decisions about their healthcare services.  And we want to make sure that systems are reopening so that they can stay open and doing that in a very measured way.

And I want to thank all the healthcare workers on the frontlines.  They have done a fantastic job in providing care and comfort, serving as the liaison between family members.  They've done a fantastic job, and we owe a debt of gratitude to them.

And to all those providers that did adhere to our guidelines: They did the right thing, and it has made an extraordinary difference.

I also want to take a couple of seconds here to talk about our nursing homes.  Our hearts and minds are with the patients and the families of those living in nursing homes.  This is an extraordinarily difficult situation.  People living in nursing homes are of the most vulnerable patients: They're elderly; many of them have underlying health conditions.  And this has been a very hard situation, and I really appreciate the strong efforts of governors and local communities that have shown great leadership in supporting nursing homes across the country, particularly Governor Baker, Governor Hogan, that have had special efforts around supporting nursing homes.

FEMA is also working on a plan to make sure that nursing homes have the supplies that they need.  And just last week, we increased the reimbursement in the Medicare program for high-throughput tests, and we are also paying for labs to go out to nursing homes to collect samples.  And that's going to really support efforts on nursing homes in order to isolate patients.

Today, we are also announcing, under the President's leadership, an effort around nursing home transparency.  It's important that patients and their families have the information that they need, and they need to understand what's going on in the nursing home.

And so, today, we are announcing that we are requiring nursing homes to report to patients and their families if there are cases of COVID virus inside the nursing home.  We are also requiring nursing homes to report directly to the CDC when they have cases of COVID virus.

And this is very important.  As you've heard Dr. Birx talk about, as we reopen the United States, our surveillance effort around the COVID virus will also begin in nursing homes.  And so by having this reporting system, this will support CDC’s efforts to have surveillance around the country and to support efforts around contact tracing so that we can mitigate the spread of the virus in those communities that show spread starting in the nursing homes.

So again, I want to thank all of the local officials that have done an amazing job in supporting the nursing homes, and would urge all state and local leaders to follow their lead and do everything that we can to keep nursing home residents safe.

Thank you.

THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you very much, Seema.

And Dr. Hahn is here.  If you need, he'll tell you maybe a little bit later, if you want this -- but I can tell you that, very simply: The level at which they are approving things, tests, and being on top of the people that are doing the testing for therapies and for vaccines has never -- they've never seen anything like this.  So I want to thank you very much.  And stick around.  Maybe they'll have some questions.

Okay?  Please, go ahead.  In the back.

Q    Mr. President, thank you very much.  If there were groups of people planning to protest tomorrow against the government shutdown, what would be your advice?

THE PRESIDENT:  Against the shutdown?

Q    Well, yeah.  That they want the shutdown lifted.  Should they go ahead if it’s in --

THE PRESIDENT:  They want it lifted?  Yeah.

Q    -- a state where there haven’t been 14 days --  

THE PRESIDENT:  Please.  I don’t have any advice.  People feel that way.  You’re allowed to protest.  I mean, they -- they feel that way.

I watched a protest and they were all six feet apart.  I mean, it was a very orderly group of people.  But, you know, some -- some have gone too far.  Some governors have gone too far.  Some of the things that happened are maybe not so appropriate.

And I think, in the end, it's not going to matter because we're starting to open up our states.  And I think they're going to open up very well.  We're going to be watching it.  We're going to be watching it very closely.  We're working with them on testing.  We're working with them on whatever they need.  I don't think they need ventilators anymore.

I believe the term the governor used was “phenomenal.”  We've done a phenomenal job.  That was the term that -- that was the only sentence they left out, which is okay.  But I -- I appreciate that that's what Governor Cuomo said.  But we have -- they've done a phenomenal -- these people have done a phenomenal job.

As far as protesters -- you know, I see protesters for all sorts of things.  And I'm with everybody.  I'm with everybody.

Please, in the back.  Go ahead.  In the back.  Go ahead.  Are you ready?  Yeah.

Q    Yes, please.  Thank you, Mr. President.  Jenn Pellegrino with OAN.  Yesterday, you pointed out that Iran was likely not truthful in their reporting of the virus.  Meanwhile, Senator Dianne Feinstein and other Democrats are looking for $5 billion in aid to Iran.  Are you considering giving any aid to Iran?

THE PRESIDENT:  If Iran needed aid on this, I would be willing to do something, if they want it.  If they’d ask for it, I would be certainly willing.  They were hit very hard.  Obviously, those numbers weren't correct numbers that they reported.  But if they needed help, if they needed aid, if they needed ventilators -- we have thousands of ventilators currently on hand, and ventilators under construction, under -- that are under construction.

That's a mosquito.  I don't like mosquitoes.  I don't like mosquitoes at all.

But if they -- yeah, we would certainly be willing to help.  What they should do is be smart and make a deal.

It's only because of -- you know, you look at what happened.  It’s -- John Kerry, I guess, just doesn't want them to make a deal.  And they’re probably figuring they can wait and maybe it will be Biden.  And they'll own America if Biden gets -- and they know, with me, doesn't work that way.  It doesn't work that way.  If -- if Joe Biden got in, they’d own America.  Between them, China, Japan, Mexico, Canada, they’d own America.  You wouldn't have a country left if he got in.

Go ahead, please.

Q    Mr. President, the first question: You mentioned that you've seen some governors -- I think you said this yesterday too -- that some governors, you think, have gone too far.  Which governors are you referring to, sir?  Which states?  And then --

THE PRESIDENT:  I don't want to mention -- I don’t want to mention names specifically.  But obviously, one we can mention that’s this, but really much beyond this, is Virginia with what they've done on guns.  He is playing with your Second Amendment.  We can't allow that to happen.  And that is indirectly related to this, because you know what's happened with guns.  People are buying guns at a level that you haven't seen before because of -- because of this surge of -- of plague.  So what he did was totally inappropriate.

Other than that, I'm not going to mention governors.  But I have a list: one, two, three, four, five, six, seven.

Q    On money, sir, you mentioned at the top that you hope that a deal may come tomorrow on the small-business loan program.

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, I hope so.

Q    But, you know, this morning, Mnuchin seemed like this was ready to go.  It seem like any second now.

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, I don’t know.  Whatever it is, they’re --

Q    Is there any -- is there any changes there?

THE PRESIDENT:  You know, every time you say it’s ready to go, then they say, “Oh, we have a good negotiating position now because he just said it’s ready to go.  So now…”  Let’s see what happens.

But we want to put our -- we want to take care of our workers.  We want to take care of our small businesses.  They’re really the engine of this country.  We have to take -- when we open, we want to have those small businesses ready to go.  We don't want to -- we don't want those businesses abandoned because they couldn't afford their employees, they couldn't take care.  And I want to take care of those employees.

Q    But what’s the hold-up now, sir?  Just in terms of this --

THE PRESIDENT:  I can't tell you that.  I can just tell you that we're negotiating with the Democrats.  And, you know, they negotiate for things that we can't do, that we don't think are in the best interest of the people of this country.  We are very close to a deal.  I can't tell you whether or not we're going to get the deal or not.

Who would say that?  You want me to say we -- we’re going to have a deal before we have a deal?

Q    But for people with businesses and --

THE PRESIDENT:  We have a good chance of getting a deal.  A lot of good discussions were had today.  And we have a good chance of getting the deal.  We want the deal.  We want to take care of our workers, and we want to take care of our small companies.

Q    Mr. President.

THE PRESIDENT:  Go ahead, please.

Q    Thank you, Mr. President.  I have a question for you and also for Dr. Hahn, if I may, after I get to your question.

THE PRESIDENT:  Sure.

Q    In your remarks that you made just a few moments ago, in regards to reopening the U.S. economy, you said, “I want it to be safe.”  And that's a sentiment, obviously, shared by --

THE PRESIDENT:  I do.  No, I want it to be safe.

Q    -- tens of millions of Americans.

THE PRESIDENT:  I want it to be safe.  Absolutely.

Q    And it seems at odds, Mr. President, with the tweet that you had on Friday about liberating those three particular states -- Virginia, Minnesota, and Michigan -- because none of those states, Mr. President, have met the requirements that the Vice President and others on the task force have talked about, in terms of reopening the economy.  Do you see those two --

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, if you take the -- if you take --

Q    -- ideas at odds?

THE PRESIDENT:  -- Michigan, there were things in the Michigan that I don't think they were necessary or appropriate.  Everyone knows that.  I think the governor of Michigan -- and we're getting along very well, but I think the governor of Michigan probably knows that.  I think she probably wished she didn't put some of them in.  You can't buy paint.  You can't buy seeds.  You can’t have -- I mean, where did this stuff come from?

No, no -- we're going to be safe.  We have to be safe.  And we don't want to close anything.  We're not going to be closing.  But we're going to be doing it beautifully, systematically.  We're working very well with the governors.  I mean, I would say, pretty much almost all of them.  A couple of them, no matter what you do, you'll never satisfy them.  You could -- you could find the cure tomorrow and they wouldn't be satisfied.  They'd find a reason to complain.  Wise guys.

But, for the most part, we're working very well with the governors.  We have a great relationship with the governors.

I can tell you, I've been on numerous calls with governors, and during those calls -- I mean, without exception, they were friendly.  And that's going back even a month -- a month from today.

So I think that we're going to do a terrific job.  I think the governors are going to do a terrific job.  And we're starting to open our country.  And, you know, as you know, some -- I just spoke with Greg Abbott today, from Texas.  He's fantastic.  He’s a fantastic governor.  And he's going to be opening up parts of Texas.  And you're going to be opening up parts of other countries.  You know what they -- other states.  And you know what that is.

And, by the way, other countries are at a point where they're starting.  I see where Germany is starting to open up a little section.

So there are a lot of great things happening, and we're going to start to open our country.  And we're going to do it -- it's like -- as they say, it's like a beautiful puzzle.  The state -- it might even be a portion of a state.  You know, there are states -- very big states, and you can have portions of states, Mike.

THE VICE PRESIDENT:  Counties.

THE PRESIDENT:  You have a portion -- you have a county, which is perfect, and you have another county that's sort of still pretty far away, even if it's within the same state, and it's not doing so well.  But they may open a part.

So we're going to do it very, very carefully.  And I think it's going to be very successful.  But when you say safe, I want it to be very safe.

Q    For Dr. Hahn -- Mr. President, for Dr. Hahn.

Q    Mr. President, thank you very much.

Q    May I ask a question of Dr. Hahn?

THE PRESIDENT:  Let him -- let him just do this one.  Go ahead, please.

Q    Thank you very much, Dr. Hahn.

THE PRESIDENT:  Doctor.

Q    There's a question that I don't know the answer to and I was hoping that you could provide an answer to.  There’s an epidemiologist at the University of Alabama, in Birmingham, who's actually a COVID-19 survivor, and his name is Michael Saag.  And his question is this: Why would the virus suddenly be different?  Why would people’s susceptibility be any different on May the 1st, or on June the 1st, or on July 1st?  And this all relates to reopening the economy.  Can you explain or give an answer to that particular question?

DR. HAHN:  I don't think we have evidence that one would be more susceptible or less.  What I think we can say is that the mitigation efforts have really helped with respect to this, and that what we've seen is the number of cases have gone down.  And if we follow the gating criteria for the opening, we're then able to institute phase one and have the appropriate measures in place to actually reduce any chance of flare-up of the cases.

Q    Is there a chance of a sort of rebounding if you reopen too soon without the type of mitigation efforts that we’ve had still in place?

DR. HAHN:  Yes, there's a chance.  And I think Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx talked about this at the podium.  And the key here is the surveillance that is being put in place with the CDC.  I think that'll be a really great help in terms of trying to reduce that risk.

Thank you.

THE PRESIDENT:  And I think they have the rest of that clip.  I just thought it was a very good clip.  I think it's a tribute to New York.  I think it's a tribute to the federal government.  And I thought it was nice.  So I think they have that now.  They can try it.

Go ahead.

(A video is played.)

THE PRESIDENT:  Okay.  Ummm --

Q    Mr. President, you had called on me.

THE PRESIDENT:  Yes.  I did.

Q    Thank you, I appreciate it.  Since you shared with us something else that you saw on TV today, I have a question about something you said on Thursday, which is that you were “angry” because information about the virus “should have been told to us” earlier and “a lot sooner.”  “People knew it was happening, and people did not want to talk about it.”

THE PRESIDENT:  That’s right.

Q    Many Americans are saying the exact same thing about you, that you should have warned them the virus was spreading like wildfire through the month of February, instead of holding rallies with thousands of people.  Why did you wait so long --

THE PRESIDENT:  Yeah, who are you with?

Q    -- to warn them?

THE PRESIDENT:  Who -- who are you with?

Q    And why did you not --

THE PRESIDENT:  Yeah.

Q    -- have social distancing until March 16th?

THE PRESIDENT:  Who are you with?

Q    I’m Weijia Jiang with CBS News.

THE PRESIDENT:  So if you look at what I did in terms of cutting off or banning China from coming in --

Q    Chinese nationals.  But, by the way, not Americans who were --

THE PRESIDENT:  Nice and easy.

Q    -- also coming in from China.

THE PRESIDENT:  Nice and easy.  Just relax.

We cut it off.  People were amazed.  These gentlemen, everybody was amazed that I did it.  We had 21 people in a room; everybody was against it but me.  Dr. Fauci said, had I not done that, perhaps tens of thousands -- and maybe much more than that -- people would have died.  I was very early.  Very, very early.

And we just saw -- you saw Bret Baier making a statement.  They had a debate well into February and not even mentioned -- it wasn't even mentioned -- the Democrats.

Q    And you’re the President, sir --   

THE PRESIDENT:  We were very early.  Oh, I -- I'm the President.

Q    -- and you didn’t warn people that it was --

THE PRESIDENT:  And you what I just did?

Q    -- spreading so quickly.

THE PRESIDENT:  And you know what I just --

Q    And, by the way, when you issued the ban, the virus was already here.

THE PRESIDENT:  Okay.  And you know how many people -- when I used the ban -- how many cases of virus were in the United States when I issued the ban?  Do you know the number?

Q    There was -- there were already --

THE PRESIDENT:  No, no -- how many cases?  Remember, I said, “one person.”  How many cases were here when I issued the ban?  Tell me.

Q    But did you know that it was going to spread and become a pandemic?

THE PRESIDENT:  No, no, no, you have to do your research.  How many --

Q    I did my research.  On the 23rd of March, you said you knew this was going to be a pandemic well --

THE PRESIDENT:  Can I tell you what?

Q    -- before the WHO.

THE PRESIDENT:  I did know it.  I did know it.  All I have to do is look.

Q    So you know it was going to spread.

THE PRESIDENT:  All -- anybody knew it.  Just -- are you ready?  How many cases were in the United States when I did my ban?  How many people had died in the United States?

Q    So do you acknowledge that you didn’t think it was --

THE PRESIDENT:  Keep your voice down, please.

Q    -- going to spread?

THE PRESIDENT:  Keep your voice down.

Q    Did you not think it was going to spread?

THE PRESIDENT:  How many -- how many -- how many cases were in the United States?  I did a ban where I’m closing up the entire country.  How many people died?

Q    And that’s a fair point.

THE PRESIDENT:  How many people died in the United States?  And yet I closed up the country, and I believe there were no deaths -- zero deaths -- at the time I closed up the country.  Nobody was there.  And you should say “thank you very much” for good judgment.

Go ahead, please.

Q    Mr. President, you just mentioned Germany.  Germany is allowing the small stores to open tomorrow.

THE PRESIDENT:  Yes, they are.  I just spoke to them. 

Q    Does this give you confidence that some European countries are on the mend of recovery?

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, I hope so.  I mean --

Q    And will you --

THE PRESIDENT:  -- we hope it works out.  Look, I spoke to --

Q    Will you lift some restrictions on them?

THE PRESIDENT:  I spoke with Angela.  I spoke with Angela.  And they’re going to start a process of opening, very much like we are.  We are too.

I spoke with numerous governors; they’re doing it also.  Areas that have been -- that were -- number one, they've done a good job and where they don't have much of a problem.

Germany is starting the process also, yes.  And I'm very happy about that.  Some places in Europe, as you know, can't start the process for a while.

Q    Mr. President.

THE PRESIDENT:  Yes, ma'am.  Go ahead, please.

Q    Thank you, Mr. President.  I have two Nevada questions.  First one: The mayor of Las Vegas thinks it’s “total insanity” for business to be shut down in Nevada, which the Governor, Sisolak, ordered.  Who’s right?

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, they shut one of my hotels down too.  Okay?  So, you know --

Q    I am well aware. 

THE PRESIDENT:  I'm not involved in that.  I couldn't be if I wanted to, I just chose not to be.  By the way, just so you know, I could be if I wanted to, but I chose not.  But they closed a very big hotel that I have in Nevada, down in Las Vegas.

It's a very severe step he took.  I'm okay with it.  I'm okay with it.  But, you know -- I mean, you could call that one either way.  I know the mayor is very upset with it.  Some owners are very upset with it.  Some of the developers out there very upset.  Others, they say, “Hey, we got to get rid of it.”  I can -- I can see both sides of that.

Q    And I’d like to follow up with one other question.  I asked you recently about an SBA rule that said the Paycheck Protection money could not go to small casinos.  You said you'd look into it.  Clearly, something happened.

THE PRESIDENT:  They are looking into it right now because they -- they do have -- you know, they have small casinos that don't have too many people.  And they are looking, and they're going to make a ruling, I understand, next week.

Q    They already did make a ruling, and they changed it from small casinos that make more than a third of their income couldn’t qualify, to half.

THE PRESIDENT:  I know, but they’re looking at that.  They’re continuing to look at that.  It’s a big -- it’s a big topic.  Got a lot of people involved.

Q    Mr. President --

THE PRESIDENT:  Let's give it a shot.

Q    Thank you.  You know, Governor Cuomo, as you played in that clip, has indeed praised a lot of what the federal government has done, but he and --

THE PRESIDENT:  No -- excuse me.  Excuse me.  He didn't say “a lot.”  He said we did a phenomenal job.

Q    But let me say, he --

THE PRESIDENT:  He didn't say “a lot.”  He didn't say, “You did a good job on ventilators but nothing else.”  No, he said we did a phenomenal job.  So, report accurately, because you are one of the most inaccurate reporters.

Go ahead.

Q    What he has said is that -- and along with a bunch of Republican governors who have said what they need, though, is a national strategy when it comes to testing.  Because on supplies, they say --

THE PRESIDENT:  Yeah, I know.

Q    -- that they're competing against one another.

THE PRESIDENT:  I know.

Q    Why not --

THE PRESIDENT:  They said the same thing with ventilators, and now we have so many that we're going to be able to send them and help other countries that are in need.  We're doing great on testing.  And we are, actually, using the Act, as you know, on a certain company.

Q    On swabs.  But what about on the reagents?  They say that that's something that they can’t get a hold of.

THE PRESIDENT:  We have -- we’re in great shape.  It's so easy to get.  Reagents and swabs are so easy to get.  When you have to build a very expensive piece of machinery controlled by computers, that's a different thing.  And, no, we'll have -- everything is going to be in very good shape, very soon.  We're going to be in very good shape, very soon.

Yeah, please.  Go ahead.

Q    Mr. President, just the latest stimulus package: Will that have funding for states and local governments?  Mister --

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, I don't want to comment on it, but we will be saving that for another time.

Q    Will you be willing to (inaudible)?

THE PRESIDENT:  And I -- and, by the way, some states and local governments need it.  I’m the first one to admit that.  We're going to be saving that for another little bit of a later date.  It will probably be our next negotiation.

Q    Okay.

THE PRESIDENT:  But they do.  I'm in favor of it, I will say.  And I told the Republicans today.  I had a -- I think a great talk with Republican senators today, and all of them, I think.  Just about all of them.  And a conference call.  And we are going to be -- that'll be a very big topic over the next couple of weeks.  It's very important.

Q    And what is the administration doing to make sure that, you know, hotel chains and hedge funds do not access funds?

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, that’s another one.  Yeah -- no, that’s another one.  You have hotels that have big, massive buildings that are under-levered.  But if you have no income at all coming out -- no income at all -- these hotels are -- they go from under-levered to they have to be closed down.  It’s a terrible thing.

I don't know that they're working on that specific problem, but it's a problem they should be talking about.  I mean, you have people that own a hotel where they go from having a very successful hotel with, you know, many employees -- thousands of people -- to, all of a sudden, closing it down.

I read where my wonderful place in Florida, in Miami -- Doral -- they had to let a lot of the employees go because it's essentially closed.  You can't use it.  You’re not -- you can’t have the restaurants.  You can't have the -- so, you know, you have to close it down.  That's a -- that's an example of many, many hotels are closing down throughout the country.  And hopefully they're going to be able to open up relatively quickly.

Q    But the funds, sir, were specifically for small businesses.

THE PRESIDENT:  Yeah.

Q    Would you -- would the administration make sure that that’s --

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, it depends how the hotel is considered.  You know, is it owned by a big chain?  But even if it's owned by a big chain, that's devastating.  If they have 200 hotels in the country and they're closed, and it's not only in the country -- remember this: This is all over the world.  You know, if they have -- they could have 2,000 hotels that are in other countries; they're also closed.  We're in -- we're in better shape than most, when you think about it.

So I think we're going to be looking at it.  I think it's a very big problem.  And it's a lot of people employed.

Yeah, here we go.

Q    Mr. President, 22 -- more than 22 million Americans are currently unemployed --

THE PRESIDENT:  Yeah.

Q    -- as a result of this.  Today we hit the grim milestone of more than 40,000 Americans now having died from the coronavirus.  Can you explain then why you come out here and you are reading clips and showing clips of praise for you and for your administration?  Is this really the time for self-congratulations?

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, I will tell you this: What I'm doing is I'm standing up for the men and women that have done such an incredible job -- not for me; for the men and women -- admirals, Vice President, if I might.  But all of the men and women, thousands -- tens of thousands of them that built hospitals in New York and New Jersey and all over this country in record time.  They’d throw up 1,000 beds in four days.  I'm sticking up for those people.  Those people have been incredible.  I'm also sticking up for doctors and nurses and military doctors and nurses.

Q    But the clips that you played and what you read earlier was praising you and your administration specifically --

THE PRESIDENT:  All I played today was Governor Cuomo --

Q    Why is now the moment to do that, sir?

THE PRESIDENT:  -- saying very positive things about the job the federal government has done.  And those people --

Q    On the day where more than 40,000 Americans have now died.

THE PRESIDENT:  And those -- those people have been just absolutely excoriated by some of the fake news, like you.  You’re CNN; you’re fake news.

And let me just tell you, they were excoriated by people like you that don't know any better, because you don't have the brains you were born with.  You should be praising the people that have done a good job, not doing what you do.  Even that question.

So just so you understand, if we didn’t --

Q    The question is: “Why now, sir?”

THE PRESIDENT:  -- do a job --

Q    The question is “why now,” not “why are you doing it,” but why now?

THE PRESIDENT:  I’ll tell you why now.  Are you ready?

Q    Yeah.

THE PRESIDENT:  Because these people are, right now, in hospitals.  It's dangerous.  It's going to a battlefield.  And I want these people -- I want you --

Q    This wasn’t about hospital workers, sir.

THE PRESIDENT:  I want you and --

Q    This wasn’t about the doctors.

THE PRESIDENT:  It’s all about that.

Q    This was about you and your administration.

THE PRESIDENT:  It’s not about me.  No, nothing is about me.

Q    That was what you read.

THE PRESIDENT:  Look -- look, you’re never going to treat me fairly -- many of you.  And I understand that.  I don’t even know -- I got here with the worst, most unfair press treatment, they say, in the history of the United States for a President.  They did say Abraham Lincoln had very bad treatment too.

Q    Sir, the Wall Street journal headline you just read has your name in it.  It talks about “Trump remaking the playbook.”

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, that’s a positive thing, because that's an exercise in how to do it and what to do.  And that's good for the future.  People can learn from that.  But I want the men and women of this country that are in danger -- the admirals and the generals that have done a job like they've never done before.  They're in war.  We're in war.  You know, I call it the "invisible enemy."  That's the war, and it's a dangerous war.

We're also at a level when you said "40,000 people" -- and you're right: almost 40,000 people.  And --

Q    More than.

THE PRESIDENT:  Oh, “more than.”  Okay, good.  Correct me.

Q    We’re at 41,000.

THE PRESIDENT:  Good.  Well, I'm really glad you corrected me, CNN.

But here's the story.  Let me just tell you something: If we didn't do what we did, the 40,000 right now could be a million people.  It could be a million people, not 40,000.  It could be a million.

We're tracking at much less than the lowest possible estimate.  And that's a great tribute to a number of people and a number of things.  One of the things that it's a tribute to is what's taken place in this country with the American people, because they've gone inside.  They've done it.  They've done a job that nobody thought was possible.

And, in fact, when they did the models, as they call them, nobody thought it was possible.  They did models not based on this kind of success.

I've seen New York streets, and I see it in the morning -- I've watched, all my life, New York streets -- and you can't even see the pavement, there's so many people.  And you take a look this morning; you take a look -- even on Friday morning, I looked at it, I saw it through a camera -- there wasn't a person on Fifth Avenue; there wasn't a person on Madison Avenue.  I've never seen anything like it.  Because people have really listened to instructions, and they've listened to what we've had to say -- and the professionals.  They've listened.

And those people -- people should really give them a lot of credit, including people like you, because you just don't have the sense to understand what's going on.

All right.  Yeah, please.  Go ahead.

Sunday, April 19, 2020

Executive Order on National Emergency Authority to Temporarily Extend Deadlines for Certain Estimated Payment

Office of the Press Secretary
EXECUTIVE ORDER

- - - - - - -

NATIONAL EMERGENCY AUTHORITY TO TEMPORARILY EXTEND DEADLINES FOR CERTAIN ESTIMATED PAYMENTS
 

 
     By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.), and in furtherance of Proclamation 9994 of March 13, 2020 (Declaring a National Emergency Concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Outbreak), which declared a national emergency by reason of the threat that the novel (new) coronavirus known as SARS-CoV-2 poses to our Nation's healthcare systems, I hereby order as follows:

     Section 1.  Emergency Authority.  (a)  To provide additional authority to the Secretary of the Treasury (Secretary) to respond to the national emergency declared by Proclamation 9994, the authority at section 1318(a) of title 19, United States Code, to extend during the continuance of such emergency the time prescribed therein for the performance of any act is invoked and made available, according to its terms, to the Secretary.

     (b)  The Secretary shall consider taking appropriate action under section 1318(a) of title 19, United States Code, to temporarily extend deadlines, for importers suffering significant financial hardship because of COVID-19, for the estimated payments described therein, other than those assessed pursuant to sections 1671, 1673, 1862, 2251, and 2411 of title 19, United States Code.

     (c)  The Secretary shall consult with the Secretary of Homeland Security or his designee before exercising, as invoked and made available under this order, any of the authority set forth in section 1318(a) of title 19, United States Code.
     Sec2.  General Provisions.  (a)  Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

          (i)   the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

          (ii)  the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

     (b)  This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

     (c)  This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

 
                              DONALD J. TRUMP
 
THE WHITE HOUSE,
    April 18, 2020.

REMARKS BY PRESIDENT TRUMP AND MEMBERS OF THE CORONAVIRUS TASK FORCE IN PRESS BRIEFING

Office of the Press Secretary
REMARKS BY PRESIDENT TRUMP
AND MEMBERS OF THE CORONAVIRUS TASK FORCE
IN PRESS BRIEFING

James S. Brady Press Briefing Room


5:09 P.M. EDT

THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you very much.  Good afternoon.  We continue to see a number of positive signs that the virus has passed its peak.  It’s been very devastating all over the world.  A hundred and eighty-four countries.  Probably more.  That number was as of a week ago.

Dr. Birx will walk through some of these trends in a few moments, but they're very positive trends for winning.  Going to win.  We’re going to close it out.

While we mourn the tragic loss of life -- and you can't mourn it any stronger than we're mourning it -- the United States has produced dramatically better health outcomes than any other country, with the possible exception of Germany.  And I think we're as good or better.

On a per capita basis -- remember that: On a per capita basis, our mortality rate is far lower than other nations of Western Europe, with the lone exception of possibly Germany.  This includes the UK, Switzerland, Belgium, the Netherlands, Italy, France.  Spain, for example, has a mortality rate that is nearly four times that of the United States, but you don't hear that.  You hear we have more death.  But we're much bigger countries than any of those countries by far.

So when the fake news gets out there and they start talking about the United States is number one -- but we're not number one; China is number one, just so you understand.  China is number one by a lot.  It's not even close.  They're way ahead of us in terms of death.  It's not even close.  You know it.  I know it.  And they know it.  But you don't want to report it.  Why?  You'll have to explain that.  Someday I'll explain it.

Since we released the guidelines to open up America again -- and this was two days ago -- a number of states, led by both Democrat and Republican governors, have announced concrete steps to begin a safe, gradual, and phased opening.

Texas and Vermont will allow certain businesses to open on Monday while still requiring appropriate social distancing precautions.  And I can tell you the Governor of Texas, Greg Abbott, he knows what he's doing.  He's a great governor.  He knows exactly what he's doing.

Montana will begin lifting restrictions on Friday.  Ohio, North Dakota, and Idaho have advised non-essential businesses to prepare for a phased opening starting May 1st.

Throughout this crisis, my administration has taken unprecedented actions to rush economic relief to our citizens.  As an example, you don't hear anymore about ventilators.  What happened to the ventilators?  And now they're giving you the other; it's called “testing.”  Testing.  But they don't want to use all of the capacity that we've created.  We have tremendous capacity.  Dr. Birx will be explaining that.  They know that.  The governors know that.  The Democrat governors know that; they're the ones that are complaining.

Through the Paycheck Protection Program, we've already processed nearly $350 billion to 1.6 million small businesses across the nation to keep American workers on the payroll.  So we're asking the Democrats to get it done.  This should be bipartisan.  This should be 100 percent vote.  And it's really been incredible.  The $350 billion that's been approved is so popular, and it's keeping businesses open.  It'll be open hopefully forever.

Our swift action is directly supporting 30 million American jobs.  Amy Wright, from North Carolina, as an example, said the program is a “game changer” for her and her family.  It's coffee shops.  And she has 120 employees, many of whom have developmental and intellectual disabilities.  And now they're all staying, and they’re getting paid.  And she's got a dream, and it's going to take place very quickly when she opens again.  So, Amy, good luck.  North Carolina -- great place.

Scott and Julie Alderink helped lead a church and own a restaurant in South Dakota, with about 15 employees.  They were already starting layoffs.  Layoffs were moving along rapidly.  But now they've hired their employees back, and they can keep the restaurant open.  And it'll be moving quickly -- very quickly -- as opposed to not having anybody and probably not having a place to have all of these people employed.  She would have been out of business.  She would have been done.

The Paycheck Protection Program funding is now fully drained.  It's out.  It's gone.  Three hundred and fifty billion dollars to small businesses.  And, in turn, it goes to the employees of those small businesses.

Lawmakers must stop blocking these funds and replenish the program without delay.  The Democrats have to come onboard.  I used to read that these were Democrat programs, not Republican.  It seems to have switched around a lot, hasn’t it?  Huh?  Switched around a lot.  The republicans want it.  I think the Democrats probably do too.

But they also want other things that are unacceptable.  This is about COVID.  This is about the plague and what it's done to us.  This isn't about extraneous things that they've been trying to get for years and that our country doesn't want them to have.

As we enter the next stage of our battle, we are continuing our relentless effort to destroy the virus.  My administration is taking steps to protect high-risk communities by providing funding for 13,000 community health center sites and mobile medical stations.

In order to equip them with the most advanced and robust testing capabilities, these sites are incredible.  What they can do is incredible.  The job they do is incredible.  These centers provide care to 28 million people living in medically underserved urban and rural regions, including many African American and Hispanic communities.  We’re taking care of them.  And it's so important, because you've all been reading about the disproportionate numbers on African American, and you're reading a little bit less about Hispanic, but likewise Hispanic communities.  The numbers are disproportionate.  In fact, we're doing big studies on it right now.  We don't like it.  Not right.

Nationwide, we've now conducted over 4 million tests, and Deborah will be talking about that.  It's double the number conducted by any other country on Earth.  So that's more than two times, actually, the number conducted by any other country on Earth.  You hear so much about testing.  What we've done is incredible on testing.  And I started with an obsolete, broken system from a previous administration -- or administrations.  But I would really say “administration” for a different reason because testing has become so advanced over the last number of years, and we have the most advanced of all.

I spoke with other nations this morning -- the leaders -- and they all are talking about our great testing capability, and some of them want to know what to do; what -- how can they get involved, because they need it for their own countries.

In Louisiana, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New York, and other hotspots, we have also tested more people per capita, by far, than Italy, Spain, Germany, France, and the United Kingdom, and all other major countries.  So think of that.  In New York, for instance, per capita testing is 6 percent higher than in Singapore.  In fact, there’s a typo.  It's 67 percent higher.  That’s a big difference.

I'd say there's a big difference between six percent and sixty- -- I was looking; I said, 6 percent doesn't look too good.  It's 67 percent -- good job out there -- higher than Singapore; 64 higher than South Korea; and 47 percent higher than Australia.  So it's 67 percent higher than Singapore, which is a very advanced place in terms of what they're doing.

My administration has also been speaking frequently with many of the governors to help them find and unlock the vast unused testing capacity that exists in their states.  Dr. Birx discussed yesterday the commercial and academic laboratories, and the states have tremendous unused capability, which they can use.  The governors should use it.  Tremendous unused capability, and they're waiting for business from these governors that -- some of them complain.  I must tell you, for the most part, we're getting along great with them, but some of them like to complain.

But I still go back because the hardest thing of all, by far, by a factor of 20, is the ventilators.  And now we're the king of ventilators.  We have ventilators.

We’re going to be helping other countries very soon.  We're going to be helping Mexico.  I spoke with the President of Mexico.  He's great.  A great guy.  And I told him we're going to be helping him.  They desperately, in Mexico, need ventilators, and I told him we're going to be helping him very substantially.  We're in a position to do that.  We're building, now, thousands a week.  And they're coming in rapidly, and they're very, very high quality.

But we're also helping governors to develop strategies to smartly deploy their testing capacity to protect vulnerable and underserved populations, while getting Americans at lower risk safely back to work.

So, again, we have tremendous testing capacity.  Now, a lot of people like the Abbott test that we came up with.  Abbott is a brand-new technology, brand-new test.  It’s great.  It’s five minutes, boom, you put it in.  And we're making thousands of machines.  Abbott is making thousands and thousands of machines.  But not everybody is going to get that one, but they’re going to get others.  We have numerous platforms which we'll talk about in a minute.

Unfortunately, some partisan voices are attempting to politicize the issue of testing, which they shouldn't be doing, because I inherited broken junk.  Just as they did with ventilators where we had virtually none, and the hospitals were empty.  For the most part, the hospitals didn't have ventilators.  We had to take care of the whole country, and we did a job, the likes of which nobody -- we assembled an army of young, brilliant people.  For the most part, young; a couple of older ones.  But for the most part, they were young, brilliant geniuses that did a job like nobody would believe.  I wish you could have seen it.  Around the clock.

And now the rest of the world is coming to us, asking if we could help them with ventilators because they're very complicated, very expensive.  They're very hard to build.  And we have them coming in by the thousands.  But you don't hear that from even the governors.  Nobody is complaining about ventilators.  And if there was a surge, we could have ventilators to them within hours, because we have in stockpile almost 10,000 ventilators.

You don't hear about hospital beds.  When I first started, everyone was talking, “Oh, hospitals beds.  Hospitals beds.”   The governor of New York correctly asked me for hospital beds, and we got the Army Corps of Engineers out, and they built them.  He needed them.  I mean, he -- we went -- I know he said that we were projecting.  We're not projecting New York.  We're listening to the governors.  He wanted them.  He needed them.  And we gave him thousands of beds in Javits Center.  We brought the ship.  And then the ship, we had it converted to COVID-19.  And that was a big deal, by the way, because of ventilation and all the things we had to do.  But we did.

And fortunately for him -- and for us, all of us -- they haven't used either one very much because the numbers have gone down significantly.  But it was there, and it was built, and it was beautiful.  Two thousand nine hundred beds.  It was incredible what they did.  They did it in a matter of a few days.

But, unfortunately -- and it was very good; the relationship was very good.  And I'm, frankly, glad they don't need them, but they were there.  Louisiana, the same thing.  I think the governor -- a Democrat, good guy -- and he will, I think, tell you a story that we had more than enough, and I said, “Well, we're supposed to build one more.”  I called him and I said, “You know, if we don't have to build this hospital” -- it was an additional anywhere from 500 to 1,000 beds.  “If you don't need it, would it be possible that we don't build it?  We’d like to build it someplace else, or not build it at all and save money,” which is okay for government to use it someplace else.  And he called call me back the next day and he said, “Sir, we don't need it.”  I said, “That's great that you say that.  I appreciate it.”  And he didn't need it.

But we were ready to go, and we took good care of Louisiana.  We took good care of Michigan.  We took good care of every place.  We didn't -- we didn't miss a trick.

And we're in great shape on testing.  We have different platforms.  We actually have nine different platforms.  And on Monday, we're going to be adding one; that'll be 9 to 10.  I don't like to count on them before they're up, but we’ll have anywhere from 9 to 10 platforms with a tremendous testing capability.  And people can go, and especially with phase one.

Now, at the same time -- just like with ventilators -- we're building now the best ventilators.  Just like with ventilators, our testing is getting better and better.  I took the first test.  The first test was not pleasant.  This was not a pleasant thing.  I said, “You got to be kidding” to the doctor.  “You got to be kidding.”  Up your nose and then we hang a right, and it goes down here.  And then we'll wiggle it around here, under your eye.  And then we'll pull it out and we'll say -- I said, “No, that's -- there's no way that can happen.  Is that the way it goes?  You sure?”  This was a very unpleasant test.

And then I was tested a few weeks later with the new test that just came out, the Abbott, where they just touch your nose, basically.  And they put it in a machine, and literally, a few minutes later, they tell you if you're fine.  And I was lucky in both cases, because I've seen the damage that this does to people.

But we have great tests.  They've really gotten better and better and better as we go along.  But we have a tremendous lab capability -- laboratory capability all over the country.  And for some reason, the governors, they’re not -- a lot of them are, but some of the governors like to complain, and they're not using it.  We have tremendous capability.  We're ready for them.

And, as we go along, just like with ventilators, we’ll get better, more advanced, and, you know, it'll be -- we'll be able to do things that nobody would have even believed possible.  But we started off with a broken system.  We inherited a broken, terrible system.

And I always say it: Our cupboards were bare.  We had very little in our stockpile.  Now we're loaded up.  And we also loaded up these hospitals.  And, you know, we're talking about payment.  We gave billions of dollars’ worth of things to hospitals, and we'll have to work that out at some point.  In fact, I guess they're going to be working that out with Congress.

But we loaded up hospitals.  The federal government loaded up hospitals with things to take care of people that are very desperately -- we're not -- we weren't worried about payment at that time.  We said, “You'll take care of it at the right time.”

But we gave billions and billions and billions of dollars’ worth of medical goods and medicines and equipment to hospitals.  And we'll -- we'll work it out with them.  But people don't like to talk about that.

So we have done a job that nobody believed -- this was a military and private enterprises march.  We marched -- and, unfortunately, with the other side, because they're viewing it as an election.  “How did President Trump do?”  “Oh, he did, uh, terribly.  Let's see.  He did -- uh, yeah, he did terribly.”  “Oh.”  But we just got them the ventilators that they didn't have, that they should have had.  We just got them hospital beds by the thousands.  We just got them testing that they don't even know how to use.  In some cases, they have machines that they're only using 5 percent and 10 percent of the machine, because they have an advanced machine and they don't know how to use it.  It can use -- it can do much more.  So we've had people explain how to use it.

So, I don't know, I don't think I do that on the other side.  I don't -- I really don't.  I think that here we have a crisis that we have to work together, and I hope we're going to work together.  But we're moving along, and we're moving along well.  We're moving along well.

This should not be a partisan witch hunt -- you know? -- like the Russia hunt that turned out to be a total phony deal.  Unfortunately, some of these voices, though, are attempting to -- to bring this into politics.  And whether it's testing or ventilators or hospital beds, or other dimensions of our sweeping public health response -- we have had a sweeping response.

In speaking to the leaders of other countries this morning, they said, “This is incredible the way you've done this so quickly.”  You know, we're only talking about a few weeks since everybody knew this was such a big problem.  And the rest of the world is watching, and they respect what we've done because I don't think anybody else -- I know nobody else could have done what we've done.  And we started with garbage.

As our experts said yesterday, America's testing capability and capacity is fully sufficient to begin opening up the country, totally.  Indeed, our system is by far the most robust and advanced anywhere in the world, by far.  The rest of the world will tell you that.

I spoke this morning to a friend of mine, President Moon of South Korea.  He just won the election.  He won it by a lot.  He had a big victory, which I was happy about.  And he was saying what a great job we've done in this country.  I told him the same thing.  He said what a great job we've done here in this country.  So I appreciated that.  He had a great -- by the way, he had a great victory and we're very happy about that, from the standpoint of our country.  We’re working very well with them -- South Korea.

As we approach -- and the approach that we use -- but as we approach, hopefully, the downward side of what's going on, I think you're going to see some incredible hard facts and evidence that what we did was right.  There's a lot of talk about herd -- the word “herd.”  I don't want to show you charts of people that went a different way, but it's scary.  It's scary.

We would have had, I think, millions of people die had we done a different way.  And I think numbers are just coming out where they're estimating 60,000 people will die.  That's horrible.  I always say one person is too much, especially in this case, when it could have been stopped in China.  It could have been stopped in China, before it started, and it wasn't.  And the whole world is suffering because of it.

But this herd concept -- and everybody had to think of it at the beginning, because, look -- look at us: We had the greatest economy in the history of the world.  Better than China; better than any country in the world; better than any country has ever had.  We had the highest stock market in history, by far.  And I’m honored by the fact that it has started to go up very substantially.  That's because the market is smart.  The market is actually brilliant.  I've seen it.  And they're viewing it like we've done a good job.  They view it that way.

Because if you would have told me that we're at 24,000 or beyond, and the highest we were ever was -- we never hit 30.  We were getting close to 30, so let's say around 29,000.  We’re at 24.  If we were heading down, I would start to say, “Oh, wow, we may be heading into territory where I started.”  I didn't like that.  Now we're way up.  But if you would have said to me with what we've gone through -- not caused by our country or our people or any -- I mean, not caused by certainly anybody within our country.  But if you would have said that, after going through this horrible plague, that we'd have a stock market that's much, much higher than when I started, much higher than where I started -- and I think it's -- you know, I think we have tremendous momentum.  We have a big election coming up, but I think we have tremendous momentum.

First, we get rid of the plague.  And because of what we're doing with the PPP, what we're doing with the Paycheck, as we call it, I think we have a chance to have these companies get back to action quickly.

But our approach to testing is based on facts, data, and very hard evidence, not partisan agendas or coordinated political talking points.

Mike Pence, who’s a phenomenal guy, he’s making the commencement address right now at the Air Force Academy, where they're being very politically correct.  Everyone is standing not 6 feet but 10 feet apart.  Okay?  And it's very different.  I made that speech last year.  I'm going to West Point.  I think they're changing the date to June 13th because of what's going on in New York.  They're moving into June 13th.  West Point.

So I'm doing their commencement speech, and they're going to have -- it’s sad because -- but it's a big start -- they're going to have the cadets.  They may not have the parents, but they're going to have the cadets.  The parents are so proud of them.  I know at the Air Force Academy, where Mike is speaking right now, they don't have the parents; they have the cadets.  They’re very, very widespread.

And you talk about social distancing -- I mean, they are really spread.  I looked at it.  They using 10 feet.  So he's -- he's doing that.  But they’re having it.  It's very important to have it.  And that's a great thing.  That's a great thing.  That's a big start.

So he's there right now.  And I will tell you, they -- he's a gentleman, Mike Pence.  A real gentleman.  And they requested -- the Democrat senators requested a phone call with him yesterday.  And I think they had, for the most part, all of them on -- like, approximately 47.  I heard it was just about all of them, whatever it might be.  I don't want to be wrong by 1 or 2 or 10 and have the press say, “He lied.  He told a lie.  Terrible, terrible.”  Whatever it was.  But they have 47, and I guess most of them were on.

I heard they were so rude.  I used a term today -- I said, rude and nasty.  But I heard they were so rude.  No matter what he said, which was all very positive in terms of winning this battle against the invisible enemy -- no matter what he said, they were fresh.  They were nasty.

And it was, I heard, just a terrible thing.  And I said, “Mike, that's politics.  That's what it is.”  If we came into this room today and said, “The battle is over.  We have won.  It's 100 percent gone.”  The Democrats would say, “The President has done a horrible job.  He has done a disgraceful job.  It is a shame how bad he is.”

You know, it's -- it's -- this is the talking points; this is political.  And it would be nice not to have that, especially when we've done the job we've done.  I mean, all you have to do is look at the big -- the big “V” for victory or “V” for ventilator.  Take a look at it.  Everybody said they had us on that; they had us.  They thought they had us, but we got them done at numbers that nobody would have believed.

And we did use our Act, our Production Act, and we used it.  But didn't use it -- we didn't need it like a hammer.  All we had to do -- for the most part -- we used it, actually, in a number of cases.  But for the most part, all we had to do is talk about it.  All we had to do is say, “We're going to use it if you don't do this.”  And everybody was, you know, for the most part, good.  We used it a couple of times because it didn't work out the easy way, but it worked out the hard way.

But whether it was masks or ventilator, it was incredible what we've been able to do.  So this is a very critical time for the American people, and the American people deserve real information, and responsible and thoughtful dialogue from their elected leaders and from the media.

The media has been -- some very honest, but some very dishonest.  You know that.  You know that.  I mean, I even read a story where Mark Meadows -- a tough guy -- he was crying; he was crying.  This was a Maggie Haberman.  You know, she won a Pulitzer Prize for her coverage of Russia, but she was wrong on Russia.  So was everyone else.  They should all give back their Pulitzer Prizes.

In fact, it turned out that the crime was committed by the other side.  The crime was not committed by this side; it was committed by the other side -- a bunch of bad people.  You saw the reports coming out over the last two weeks.  They got caught.  So Maggie Haberman gets a Pulitzer Prize?  She's a third-rate reporter.  New York Times.

And we put her name up here last week.  You saw that.  People thought it was a commercial.  It wasn't a commercial.  It was like a commercial, but it wasn't a commercial.  It was just clips.  And because we exposed her as being a bad reporter, what happened is she came out and said Mark Meadows was crying.  And they made it sound -- I said, “Mark” -- and it's okay if he did.  I wouldn't -- you know, look.  But I think he was crying probably -- really, for the wrong reason they had it down.  But he's not a crier.  And if he was -- I know criers.  I could tell you people that you know that are very famous.  They cry, and that's okay too.

But it was a nasty story in so many ways.  It was fake news.  And she only did it because we exposed her for being a terrible, dishonest reporter.  She is.  I've known her for a long while.  I haven't spoken to her in a long time.  I made the mistake: I take a picture with her at the desk, a long time ago.  Every time she does a story, if I say -- I haven't spoken to her in long -- many, many, many months, maybe years.  I don't speak to her.  She’s fake.  A lot of people are fake.  A lot of people  We got a lot of fake people.

But what happens is she writes this story as retribution.  Puts it in the New York Times.  And the New York Times is a very dishonest newspaper.  It’s my opinion.  It’s not an opinion.  It’s actually, from my standpoint -- you know, the very hard thing to figure, though: Most people wouldn’t know that, but I know it because I know the facts.

And they make up -- I said it today; they make up words.  “Sources say…” Most often used: “Sources say…”  You know what “sources say” means?  “Sources say” means they have nobody.  And they make it up.  Okay?

And they have a few other type statements that mean the same thing.  But “sources say” is the most often-used express- -- in the Washington Post; New York Times, especially; CNN -- fake news.  CNN.

They should really be mandated, and I mean mandated to use a name.  If there's a source, use a name.  Say that Kayleigh -- “Kayleigh McEnany said…” or somebody.  And you’d find out that the -- number one, the source wouldn't say it.  The sources don't exist.  I don't believe the sources exist.

And I try and tell this -- you know, the beautiful thing about doing these conferences is that we have tremendous numbers of viewers, and I'm able to reach the viewers without having to go through fake news, where they make a good story into a bad story.

So, with all of that, it's been an incredible period of time.  We've done a fantastic job.  We’re the talk of other nations.  The leaders of other nations are calling us for help.  They're calling us for equipment.  They're calling us for testing capacities.

Now, with the testing, we are going further.  Deborah is going to talk about that now.  With the testing, we have some other tests coming up that are going to be, I think, phenomenal.  I think they're going to blow away everything as soon as they come out, and we're going to get them out as soon as possible.

But I'd like to ask Dr. Birx to come up and say a few words about where we've come, how far we've come, and more importantly, where we're going from this point.  Because honestly, it's -- it's quite amazing.  Thank you very much.

DR. BIRX:  Thank you, Mr. President.  If we could have the first slide.

I wanted to give you an update on where we are as states and as counties and as cities.  I know you all are watching carefully.  The numbers have shifted over the last few days.  What happens when nations -- when states change the reporting from “confirmed” to “probable”?  So now all probable cases are included.  They had to add them back in.  Even though the cases may have been from March, they were added over 14, 15, and 16th of April, and states may continue to be adding them.  Eventually, we're hoping that those get accounted for on the day when the presumptive cases or the probable cases were counted.  But right now, they're added in, in one fell swoop.

So this is New York and New Jersey, and I think we all know how difficult and what a difficult time both New York and New Jersey have had.  I call your attention to the axis; it goes up to 250,000 cases.  So you can get a frame of how we're talking about some of the other metro areas.

Next slide.

This is the 25 metro areas -- the top 25 metro areas.  And you can only see the New York metro area in this slide.  Again, the axis goes up to about 300,000.  It includes the New Jersey part of the metro area, as well as part of southern Connecticut.

Next slide.

But if I take New York out -- and the reason I wanted to do that -- now the axis is one-tenth of the previous axis.  So that previous ax- -- the previous slide, 300,000.  This slide, 30,000.  So that will give you a frame of reference for some of these other metros.

The reason I wanted to show you this is this is cumulative cases.  And we are still tracking, very closely, the issues in Chicago and Boston.  But on this slide, I hope you can see the yellow line; that is Detroit.  And Detroit and this mayor of Detroit has really done an extraordinary job, and the people of Detroit have done an extraordinary job with their social distancing.

The other line I want to call your attention to is the line here.  This is New Orleans.  And I think -- frankly, I was concerned about New Orleans because they had a lot of preexisting comorbidities.  They only -- they have two or three major hospitals, but a large cover, a very large area of geographic area.

And that other blue line that you can see -- it's down right here -- that's the Seattle line.  And you can see that their response, because of the nursing home alert, they were one of the first states and the first metro areas to really move to social distancing.  And so they’ve really never had a peak, like many of the other metros.

Next slide.

Then I just want to take you through some of these new case graphics.  That was cumulative cases.  This is daily cases.  And obviously, there's a lot of variability, and variability in reporting, but you get a sense over time, when you look at daily cases.

So New Orleans is on the -- on panel on your left, and Baton Rouge on your right.  But you can see clearly, New Orleans, about a month ago, very low levels, probably less than 50 cases.  Large peak and spike around the beginning of April.  And they have come down, and they have it down to very few cases.  Again, I showed you before how both their syndromic cases have come down, as well as their actual case -- number of cases.

Next slide.

This is Seattle.  So you can see they had a much lower peak.  And this is -- when we talked about flattening the curve, this is what flattening the curve looks like.  It becomes a longer, slower decline, but it ever gets very high, and then goes back down.

Next slide.

And then this is Detroit.  And we always look at the metros as a consolidated.  So this is both Wayne and Oakland in Michigan.  And we really want to thank the mayor for the incredible job that they have done to really ensure that everyone is receiving the adequate healthcare and testing, and they've done quite a good job with testing in Michigan.

But all of these states -- Louisiana and New York have tested 30,000 per million inhabitants.  Those are some of our highest numbers across the board.

And next slide.

And so the President talked about the case fatality rates, and we really -- we've lost a lot of Americans to this disease, and we pray and hope for each one of them that are in the hospitals and the excellent care.

What this graph illustrates is the amazing work of the American people to really adhere to social distancing.  This was some -- this was nothing we had ever attempted to do as a nation, and the world hadn't attempted to do.  But they were able to decrease the number of cases so that, in general, most of the metro areas never had an issue of complete crisis care of all of their hospitals in the region.

And so you can see our case fatality rate is about half to a third of many of the other countries.

THE PRESIDENT:  And, excuse me, does anybody really believe this number?  Does anybody really believe this number?

DR. BIRX:  I put China on there so you could see how basically unrealistic this could be.  When highly developed healthcare delivery systems -- the United Kingdom and France and Belgium and Italy and Spain -- with extraordinary doctors and nurses and equipment have case fatality rates in the 20s, up to 45, and Belgium’s extraordinarily competent healthcare delivery system, and then China at .33, you realize that these numbers, even -- and this includes the doubled number out of Wuhan.

And so I wanted, really, to put it in perspective, but I wanted you also to see how great the care has been for every American that has been hospitalized and how extraordinary work of our doctors and nurses in our laboratorians on the front line who have been doing an excellent job.

Next slide.

And then we also wanted to show --

THE PRESIDENT:  If I might add, though, also --

DR. BIRX:  Yeah.

THE PRESIDENT:  -- the number for Iran.  Does anybody really believe that number?  You see what’s going on over there.  Does anybody -- put that slide back, if you would.  Does anybody believe this number?  Does anybody believe this number?  You saw more bags --

DR. BIRX:  And this is why --

THE PRESIDENT:  -- on television than that.

DR. BIRX:  This is why the reporting is so important.  And I think you remember, almost six weeks ago, maybe a month ago, I was telling you what Italy was showing to us and what France was telling to us, and the warnings that they gave to us and said, “Be very careful.  There's an extraordinary high mortality among people with preexisting conditions.”  And we used their information to bring that to the American people.

That came -- that alert -- that alert, before we even had significant cases, came from our European colleagues on the front line.  And that's why we keep coming back to how important, in a pandemic and a new disease, it's really critical to have that level of transparency because it changes how we work as a nation.  It allowed us on -- over March 15 to make an alert out there about vulnerable individuals and the -- really, they need to protect them, and my call-out to millennials to really protect their parents, protect their grandparents, and get that information out to everyone that there were preexisting conditions that put people at greater risk.  That information came from our European colleagues who were in the midst of their battle themselves.

And so there is never an excuse to not share information.  When you are the first country to have an outbreak, you really have a moral obligation to the world to not only talk about it, but provide that information that's critical to the rest of the world to really respond to this credibly.

And I really want to thank our European colleagues who have worked so hard to get us that information, even in the midst of their own tragedies.  And I think that really shows how important transparency is.

And we go to the next slide.

We can show you this really encouraging and great news: So we know that fatalities will continue to lag because people are in hospitals still, and some are still sit in intensive care units.

But these COVID-like illnesses -- this is our hospitalizations that are related to flu per 100,000 Americans.  This is this year's flu season.  And you can see our COVID-like illnesses.  And this is all of them, probable and confirmed cases.  Our hospitalizations are declining.

Now, I showed you metros that have made tremendous progress, and we've been up here many times talking about it being 6, 10, 15 additional cities.  And now we're really just focused on Chicago and Boston and Massachusetts, and really some issues that Providence is starting to improve now.  So their relationship to the two large outbreak cities.  But this is really reassuring to us, the progress we're making across the country against this disease.

And I'm -- just really want to conclude by thanking again the American people for making these type of graphics possible; thank the data team who puts these together for me.  So they are working until about 3:30 every morning to make sure that we have the most up-to-date information.  That's the data that goes to our supply-chain individuals to ensure that every hospital in every state and every community has what they need based on data, and to make sure that we're serving the needs of the American people as effectively as possible.

Thank you, Mr. President.

THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you very much, Deborah.  Fantastic job.  Is this yours?

DR. BIRX:  Yes.

THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you very much.

The fact is that we've been learning a lot from Deborah and Tony and so many of the professionals, the director.

PEPFAR: We’re spending -- the United States, without help, to the best of my knowledge -- mostly in Africa, $6 billion a year.  And that's on AIDS.  What we've done for AIDS in Africa is unbelievable.  We spend $6 billion a year.  That's been going on for a long time.  Nobody knows that; you've never heard that.  I've never heard that.  Six billion dollars a year.

Millions of people are living right now, and living very comfortably, because of the fact that we have found the answer to that horrible, horrible plague.  That was a plague.

But we spent $6 billion a year.  And from what I hear, it’s very well spent, done by professionals, including this great professional right here.  That was the thing that you worked hardest on and something that was very close to her heart.  So it's -- you know, it's something that I think people should start hearing.

The World Health Organization: We're just finding more and more problems.  And we spend this money really well.  There are other ways we can spend the $500 million.  That’s $500 million; this is $6 billion.  But we can find other ways to spend it where people are going to be helped, we think, in a much greater -- in a much greater way.

We're doing some research on certain people that take a lot of credit for what they do.  And NIH is giving away a lot of money -- a lot of money.  We’d give away for years -- for many years, they’d give away a lot of money.  And some people complain and some people don't.  Some people are extremely happy.  So we're looking into that also.

They're giving away approximately, as I understand it, recently, more than $32 billion a year.  Thirty-two billion.  And so we've been looking at that for a while, and we're going to be having some statements to be made about that.  Thirty-two billion dollars a year.  It's a lot of money, and we want to make sure it's being spent wisely.  And we've been doing that, by the way, and we'll have some statements on that.

And those are much bigger numbers then what we're talking about with national -- if you -- if you look, with the -- with our friends from wherever they come from.  You know, 500 -- 500 million is a lot of money, but it's not a lot compared to the kind of money that we give out.  I think, over the years, it's been averaging about 32 billion dollars.  Thirty-two billion.  So we've had our eye on that one for a while.

We also talked about the lab in China where, I guess, $3.7 million was given some time ago.  And we're looking at that very closely.  Chief of Staff has that pretty much under control.  But it's money that -- too bad it got spent there.  But that was spent -- what year was that, Mark?  That was four or five years ago?

MR. MEADOWS:  That was over the last six years.  Yes.

THE PRESIDENT:  Six years ago, approximately.  So we're looking at that.  And that's the lab that people are talking about.

All right, so we're looking at a lot of things.  There’s tremendous waste in our government.  We found it in many different ways and in many different forms.  And this is one of them.  This is one of them.

We can spend -- I was talking to Dr. Birx -- we can spend $500 million using all of it in a much more efficient manner if we're -- if we choose to do that.  And it'll be to the good of many more people than are getting it right now.

But you look at the mistakes that were made -- I mean, so late, long after I said we have to close off our country.  They were actually against our closing off our country to China.  When I did that in January, they were against that.  They didn't like the idea of closing off our country.  They said it was a bad thing to do, actually, and they've since taken that back.  But it was a very lucky thing that we did it.  Very lucky.  We would have had numbers that were very significantly greater.  Tony Fauci said that.  He said it would have been very significantly greater had we not done that.

So we’ve made a lot of moves that were good moves, but it's still a very depressing subject because it's a lot of death.  And if it was stopped very early on at the source, before it started blowing into these proportions, you have 184 countries that would have been in a lot better shape.  But our country is getting back, and I expect that we're going to be bigger, better, and stronger than ever before.

All right, we’ll take a few questions.  Jeff.

Q    Mr. President, you've mentioned and the Doctor has mentioned China a few times today, that -- clearly suggesting that the data has not been good and (inaudible) --

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, you tell me: Do you think their data is good, when you see that?  Do you think that -- do you think that’s correct?  Okay?

Q    It was -- it was a pretty --

THE PRESIDENT:  Do you honestly believe that’s correct?

Q    It was a pretty dramatic contrast.  So my question for your, sir --

THE PRESIDENT:  Dramatic?  Yeah, I’d say it’s dramatic.

Q    So my question for you, sir, is --

THE PRESIDENT:  Why didn’t the -- why didn’t the press -- why didn’t you people figure that out though?  Why do we have to put up a chart?  It’s -- the number is imposs- -- it’s an impossible number to hit.  But why haven’t you come up and said that?

Q    The question, sir, is: Is China now cooperating with the United States to figure out what happened?  And what do you want from them now?

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, they said they’re doing an investigation -- that they're doing an investigation.  So let's see what happens with their investigation.  But we're doing investigations also.

Yeah, go ahead.  Please.

Q    Thank you, sir.  You’ve spoken -- we heard Dr. Birx, a moment ago, say that every country has a responsibility to tell the rest of the world what’s going on.  You've talked repeatedly about how this could have been stopped in the past.  I know you don't want to telegraph what you would do, but do you think that there should be some consequences if, in the end, you know, China was responsible for all of this?

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, if they were knowingly responsible, certainly.  If they did -- if it was a mistake: a mistake is a mistake.  But if it were knowingly responsible, yeah, then there should be consequences.  You're talking about, you know, potentially lives like nobody has seen since 1917.

And, you know, the other thing, had we not done what we did in terms of closing -- because there is that concept of, “Let's let it ride.”  But I’m -- at some point, I'm going to have to -- I don't want to embarrass countries that I like and leaders that I like, but you have to see some of these numbers.

In my opinion -- so we're talking about maybe 60,000 or so; that’s a lot of people.  But that's -- 100,000 was the minimum we thought that we could get to, and we -- we will be lower than that number.  Anywhere from 100 to 220,000 people.  But I really believe it could have been millions of people had we not done what we did.  We made a lot of good decisions, but one of those things.

Go ahead.

Q    But have you ruled out that this was an unknowing situation?  Have you ruled out that there was --

THE PRESIDENT:  I haven’t ruled out anything.

Q    Okay.

THE PRESIDENT:  I want to look at the facts as they come in.  No, I want to look at the facts.

Please.  Go ahead.

Q    Thank you, sir.  Thank you very much, Mr. President.  Last week, you claimed that you were in charge of everything.  Yet, the American people don't understand why you're unwilling to use the awesome powers of your presidency to make American companies manufacture the PPE and also the testing equipment that you need --

THE PRESIDENT:  Who are with?

Q    -- to implement -- to implement your recommendations --

THE PRESIDENT:  No, I know, but who are you with?

Q    -- of how -- I’m with TMN.  Recommendations for --

THE PRESIDENT:  TMN.  What is TMN?

Q    Talk Media News.

THE PRESIDENT:  What?

Q    My name is Doug Christian with Talk Media News.  Yes.

THE PRESIDENT:  Talk Media News.

Q    Yeah.  And so anyway --

THE PRESIDENT:  Go ahead.  Keep reading your question.

Q    The thing is, how to make companies build these testing equipment so that you can do what you want or what you recommended.

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, we’re doing that.  We’re doing -- we’re doing it.  We’re doing it right now with ventilators.  We have General Motors.  We have General Electric.  We have 11 different companies -- great companies -- building them for us all over the United States.  We're starting to make our own gowns, as they call it.  We're making some incredible things.

And as far as the testing is concerned, most of that now is done in the United States.  We're doing it in the United States on different platforms.

And so I just don't think you were listening.

Q    But senators who are complaining to --

THE PRESIDENT:  Which senators?

Q    -- to Vice President Pence yesterday --

THE PRESIDENT:  Which senators?  Which senators?

Q    Well, independent Senator Angus King was --

THE PRESIDENT:  But he’s not an independent, okay?  Angus King is worse than any Democrat.

Go ahead.

Q    But he -- but he said that he was -- that he was livid, actually, at this --

THE PRESIDENT:  Of course he said that, because he’s a -- he’s a Democrat.  Okay?  Angus King is not an independent.  He uses that term for whatever reason.  It’s a waste of time.

Q    But he’s not a very emotive-type of senator.

THE PRESIDENT:  Oh, yes, he is.  You haven’t seen him.  Okay?  You haven’t seen him.  No, Angus King is a Democrat, and that was totally staged.  I heard that, and it was totally staged.  Just like you read the question, he read his question.

Yeah, please, in the back.

Q    Mr. President, I wanted to ask you about one of your retweets that you --

THE PRESIDENT:  Which one?

Q    The one you retweeted from Paul Sperry: “Let’s see if authorities enforce the social-distancing orders for mosques during Ramadan…like they did churches during Easter.”  I’m wondering --

THE PRESIDENT:  Yeah -- no, I would like to see that.  And, you know, I just spoke with leaders and people that love mosques; they love mosques, and I'm all in favor of that.  But I would say that there could be a difference.  And we'll have to see what will happen, because I've seen a great disparity in this country.  I've seen a great disparity.

I mean, I've seen a very strong anti-Israel bent in Congress with Democrats.  It -- it was unthinkable 7 or 8 or 10 years ago.  And now they're into a whole different thing between Omar and AOC -- I say AOC plus three.  Add them on.  You have -- I mean, the things that they say about Israel are so bad.  And I -- I can't believe it.

Q    But --

THE PRESIDENT:  Now -- just a minute.  So I would be interested to see that, because they go after Christian churches, but they don't tend to go after mosques.  And I don't want them to go after mosques, but I do want to see what their -- what their bent is.

Yes, please, in the back.

Q    (Inaudible) Mr. President, that, in fact, are you suggesting --

THE PRESIDENT:  Go ahead, please.

Q    -- that imams wouldn’t follow social distancing?

THE PRESIDENT:  No, I -- I think that -- I just had a call imams.  I just had a call with ministers, rabbis.  We had a tremendous call with the faith leaders.  No, I don't think that at all.

I am somebody that believes in faith.  And it matters not what your faith is, but our politicians seem to treat different faiths very differently.  And they seem to think -- and I don't know what happened with our country, but the Christian faith is treated much differently than it was.  And I think it's treated very unfairly.

Yes, please, go ahead.  In the back.

Q    And I just want to ask --

THE PRESIDENT:  Let’s go.

Q    -- if the Department of Justice will, in fact, support --

Q    Jenn Pellegrino with OAN.

THE PRESIDENT:  OAN, please.

Q    Okay.

THE PRESIDENT:  OAN.

Q    Thank you, Mr. President.  The Paycheck Protection Program saved an estimated 15 million jobs.  It’s run out of money.  The Democrats -- specifically Nancy Pelosi -- have been blocking that funding.

THE PRESIDENT:  Yeah.

Q    Do you know why Speaker Pelosi is dragging her feet on that?

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, she thinks it's politics.  I don't think it's good politics.  Nancy Pelosi has been blocking it.  Schumer has been blocking it.  And I think they think it's good politics.  I don't think it's good politics; I think it's bad politics.  But I don't care about the politics.

It's so great for our country because we're going to have all of these companies that are -- you know, it's a bigger employer -- let's say it's the same, but essentially, it's the same power -- all of these small businesses added together -- as the big companies.  It’s about 50/50.  And it's so important.  And they would be scattered if we weren't able to do what we're doing.

And, essentially, we're giving these small businesses that won't make it -- they can't because they're closed -- we're giving them money to take care of their employees, so when we open, they can get back into business.  It's been a very popular plan, even with Democrats.  I think it basically passed unanimously twice -- the first section -- which is $350 billion.  So we're trying to get $250 [billion].

Nancy Pelosi is blocking it.  She sits in her house in San Francisco, overlooking the ocean, and she doesn't want to come back.  She doesn't want to come back.  She doesn't want to come back to D.C.  She's got to get back and get this thing approved.  It's very important.

Please.  Go ahead.

Q    Dr. Birx, if I may: You again praised the American people for doing their bit over the past few weeks.  But what goes through your mind when you see photographs of crowded beaches in Florida?  Is that a concern for when we start seeing some of these restrictions being lifted?

DR. BIRX:  Well, as I described, we go metro by metro, county by county, and so I'd have to link that with a specific county and look at their case rates.

I believe the governor and the public health system that Florida has -- they have some of the best county public health individuals I have ever had to deal with -- they are amazing -- because I had to work with them under HIV/AIDS.

So if the health -- if the county health directors believe that that's appropriate for their county, then I'm not going to second-judge an individual's approach to this, because every -- I can't see into every single county and low -- the low rates.  I can just see there's no cases.  So I don't know if that's a county with very small cases or not, but I think their county health official would know.

THE PRESIDENT:  And many of the counties, as you know, are really free of this horrible enemy.  So we're opening up.  You'll be seeing a lot of this country start to open up fairly quickly.

Yes, please.

Q    Thank you, Mr. President.  You mentioned the importance of social distancing, but, for example, Stephen Moore -- someone you appointed to your “Open the Country” task force -- is organizing a protest in Wisconsin.  But aren’t they, in a sense, protesting your very own guidelines?

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, we have a flexibility.  I didn't see what Stephen said.  I can tell you he’s a very good economist.  He's been calling shots right --

Q    Well, he said -- he said -- sorry, he said, “We need to be the Rosa Parks of government injustices.”

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, there is a lot of injustice.  When you look at Virginia, where they want to take your guns away, they want to violate your Second Amendment; when you look at -- I mean, look, I'm getting along very nicely with the governor of Michigan, but she has things -- don't buy paint, don't buy roses, don't buy -- I mean, she's got all these crazy things.  I really believe somebody sitting in their boat, in a lake, should be okay.  They shouldn't arrest people.  Some of them are being unreasonable.  I really believe that.  They're being unreasonable.

But I think Virginia is a great case, though, because they're using this -- they're trying to take your guns away in Virginia.  And if people in Virginia aren't -- aren't careful, that's what's going to happen to them.

So, yeah, I mean, I could see where he's coming from.  I think it's a strong statement -- a strong statement -- because hopefully this will be over very soon for all of us.  But some have gotten carried away.  They have absolutely gotten carried away.

Q    Do you feel, though, some of these protesters are protesting your social distancing guidelines?

THE PRESIDENT:  I don't know.  I mean, I notice there were a lot of protests out there.  And I just think that some of the governors have gotten carried away.

You know, we have a lot of people that don't have to be told to do what they're doing.  They've been really doing everything we've asked them.  We have a few states where, frankly, I spoke to the governors and I could have gotten them to do -- if I wanted -- to do what would have been, perhaps, politically correct.  But they've been doing incredibly anyway.

And as one of them said, everybody is doing exactly the same.  In fact, our record is better than states where they're under a mandate or, you know, where they've agreed to do certain things.

No, we have some great states out there, and we have incredible people in our country.  And for the most part, that -- it’s a strong statement, but I understand where he's coming from.

And I think one of the greats would be -- one of the really important places that people really have to start looking at is what's going on in Virginia, because that's a mess, where the gover- -- with, really, a governor that's under siege anyway.

Yeah, please.

Q    Thank you, sir.

THE PRESIDENT:  No, with the beautiful head of white hair.  Go ahead.  I’ll tell you if I like his hair in about a minute, after he asks the question.

Q    Gordon Lubold with the Wall Street Journal.  On that point though, does the tweeting about, in the case of Virginia, linking the Second Amendment to some of these issues about lifting some of these restrictions in these states --

THE PRESIDENT:  Yeah.

Q    -- not -- potentially pose concern for the governors and civil unrest, and potentially in those cases?

And I have a second question for you.

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, I think, just for that question, I think that's an easy one.  That's not even politics.  We're entitled to a Second Amendment, and he's trying to take the Second Amendment.  Meaning, that state is trying to take -- the Democrats in that state -- the Republicans are fighting it.

Q    (Inaudible.)

THE PRESIDENT:  They’re trying to take that -- that Second Amendment right -- that Second Amendment right away.  To me, that's liberty.  That's -- when I say, “liberate Virginia,” I would say, liberate Virginia when that kind of thing happens.  And where does it all stop?  So I think it's a very good analogy.

Go ahead.

Q    Well, I’m just -- I mean, is this the right time to, kind of, bring in a Second Amendment issue (inaudible) --

THE PRESIDENT:  I think when they talk about taking your guns away -- and if you notice, at the beginning of this pandemic, there were more guns sold, I think, than at almost any time in history, because -- so it's obviously a big issue.  And then you have them working and signing documents, trying to take your -- your Second Amendment away, essentially.  So I do think it's an appropriate time to bring it up.

Q    Can I ask my second question?

THE PRESIDENT:  Go ahead.  Go ahead.  Second.

Q    This past week, after an extraordinary slew of events from adversaries -- North Korea, Russia --

THE PRESIDENT:  Yeah.

Q    -- China and Iran -- all, kind of, pushing back on U.S. policy or toying with U.S. military forces, what's your messages to these countries who may be trying to take advantage?

THE PRESIDENT:  I don’t -- I don’t see it.  No, I don’t see it.  We had a very good relationship with Russia.  We worked on the oil deal together.  I was with --

Q    (Inaudible.)

THE PRESIDENT:  -- by telephone, the King of Saudi Arabia and the President of Russia, Vladimir Putin.  We worked out a deal on oil.  That was a very important deal to them and to us and to Saudi Arabia.  It was in a deadlock.  You know it; you covered it very well.  Actually, the Wall Street Journal covered that very well.

I worked with Putin and with the King on that.  And President Putin was a total gentleman, and it was very important to get that done.  And the King was great.  And we actually had to bring in Mexico, because Mexico was a lone holdout and they showed great flexibility.  You know the story.

No, I think we're doing fine.  Yeah, sure, it's -- North Korea, I see they're testing short-range missiles.  And, you know, they’ve been doing it a long time.  I received a nice note from him recently.  It was a nice note.  I think we're doing fine.

Look, if I wasn't elected, you would, right now, be at war with North Korea.  Okay?  I'll tell you, for your people that don't understand the world and they don't understand how life works: If I wasn't elected, you would, right now -- maybe the war would be over, hopefully with a victory.

But if you remember, when I first came in, we didn't have ammunition.  Not a good way to fight a war.  President Obama left us no ammunition.  Okay?  And he left us virtually no medical and ventilators.  He left us -- the cupboard was dry, right?  The cupboard was dry.

No, I think, right now, you'd be at war, essentially -- in some form -- it would be over, it would be raging -- with North Korea, if I weren't President.  And we're doing just fine with North Korea.  Just fine.  We'll see how it all ends up.

You know, in the meantime, they said, “Oh, Trump has given up.”  And then they said “Oh, really, what's he given up?”  And they said, “I don't know.”  Then they said, “He met.”  Oh, I met.  I met.

No, I have a good relationship with Kim Jong Un.  That's not a bad thing to have a good relationship.  Obama wanted a relationship; he wouldn't meet with Obama.  Wouldn't meet with him.  Okay?  I have a good relationship with him.  We met at the line.  I stepped over the line.  The first time anything like that’s ever -- it's all good.  It's just -- it's good.

But when they say -- the stupid people -- I call them “stupid people” or “the haters.”  They say, “Trump has given up so much.”  Really?  I’ve actually increased the sanctions.  China has been very good on the border.  In fact, right now, the border is stone-cold closed between China and North Korea.

Our relationship with China was good until they did this.  Once we found out about this -- once we found out -- look, we just made a trade deal where China is going to have to buy $250 billion a year on our product.  Fifty billion from the farmers.  Forty to fifty billion from the farmers.  The relationship was good when we were signing that, but then all of a sudden, you hear about this.

So it's a big -- it's a big difference.  You know, the question was asked, “Would you be angry at China?”  Well, the answer might very well be a very resounding “yes,” but it depends: Was it a mistake that got out of control or was it done deliberately?  Okay?  That’s a big difference between those two.  In either event, they should have let us go in.  You know, we asked to go in very early, and they didn't want us in.  I think they were embarrassed.  I think they knew it was something bad, and I think they were embarrassed.

But, you know -- no, I think we're doing very well.

Well, it's -- so you said Russia, you said China --

Q    Iran.

THE PRESIDENT:  -- you said North Korea.

Q    And Iran.

THE PRESIDENT:  Iran?  When I came in, Iran was a terror.  We had 82 points of fighting.  We had 18 points of major confliction.  The first week, I said, “Tell me about Iran.”  “Sir, we have 18 points of confliction.”  Meaning, Yemen and Syria and all -- Iraq.  They were going into Iraq all over the place.  They're a much a different nation right now.  I stopped that horrible deal.  Horrible deal.

And they want to talk, except that Kerry violated the Logan Act.  He made the deal, and doesn’t want them to make a deal because -- I would have made a deal, in my opinion, except that John Kerry, when he -- who made the deal originally, which was a stupid deal to make.  Gave them $150 billion.  Gave 1.8 billion in cash, in green.  That would be more than this room, 10 times, with hundred-dollar bills.  That you could fill up this room 10 times with hundred-dollar bills.  And it’s not that small a room.

And I say he violated the Logan Act.  I think it was a major violation.  I think we would have had a deal if it wasn’t for John Kerry.  But he doesn’t want to be, number one, embarrassed.  Number two, he said, “Let’s wait until after the election.  Maybe Sleep Joe Biden is going to win.  And if Sleep Joe Biden wins, you’ll own the United States.”

And China will own the United States.  China has paid us -- you know, from the Wall Street Journal -- hundreds of billions of dollars -- is that right? -- tariffs.  And we gave a lot of that money -- a small percentage -- but a lot of money to the farmers, and it kept the farmers going great.  All right?  But hundreds -- we get -- we’re getting tens of billions of dollars in tariffs.

And, by the way, for those of you that say, “Oh we're paying,” China devalued their currency in order to pay these.  We didn't pay.  China paid.  They don't like to write that.  They also added money into their system.  So they paid for that.

No, I think you have numerous countries waiting to see whether or not Sleepy Joe wins, because if Sleepy Joe won, they own our country.  They will take our country.

You know, we had -- go back two months -- we had, by far -- and China was supposed to catch us.  You know better than anybody, Wall Street Journal.  For years, I've heard, “By 2019, China will catch us.”  There's only one problem: Trump got elected in 2016.  That was a big difference.  And we were going leaps and bounds above China.

And before the problem with the plague -- right? -- China was having the worst year they've had in 67 years.  That was before the plague.  Now they're getting really hurt, and so is everybody getting hurt.  I don't want them to get hurt, but they're all getting hurt.  Everybody is getting hurt.  It's a horrible thing that's happened.  But we had the greatest economy in the world, by far.  China isn't even close -- go back two months -- and we're going to keep it that way.

But when you mention Iran, Iran is a much different country than it was.  When I first came in, Iran was going to take over the entire Middle East.  Right now, they just want to survive.  They're having protests every week.  They’re loaded up with the plague -- which I don't want; I've offered to help them if they want.  If they need ventilators, which they do, I would send them ventilators.  We have thousands of excess ventilators coming in and here.

We have a stockpile of ventilators, and we're starting to send them so that hospitals can fill up their stockpile, which they should have.  New York had a chance to get 16,000 ventilators, and they chose not to do it.  And I understand that.  It's a hard decision for a thing that may or may not happen.  I fully understand that.  I'm not even complaining about that.

I'm only saying this: Iran was a terror when I came into office.  Right now, they don't want to mess around with us.  They don't want to mess around with us.

Two things: North Korea, same sanctions we've always had, except more.  We haven't given anything.  I think you'll hopefully take that back to the Wall Street Journal, because they really don't understand it.  They really don't.

And with -- with Iran, I mean, that's a different country right now.  And they want to make a deal.  The only reason they don't -- they're being shamed in, because the guy that gave them the sweetheart, didn't want to.  Met with them many times.  He should have never met with them.  And in my opinion, he’s telling them, “Don't.  Wait.  Maybe Trump will lose and then you can negotiate with a patsy, with a weak guy.  And you'll take over the -- between you and Russia…”  Nobody has been tougher on Putin.  He knows it better than anybody.  Nobody been tougher on Putin than me.  Look at the sanctions.

Look at what I did with their pipeline going into Europe.  Nobody even knew about it.  I exposed it.  Now everybody talks about it.  I think it's a terrible thing for Germany to do.

But at the same time, I have a very good relationship with Putin, and I was able to get -- I was able to make a deal with Russia and Saudi Arabia and OPEC Plus.  They call “OPEC Plus.”  That's going to save us Texas, North Dakota, Oklahoma, other states, energy states.  Going to save us hundreds of thousands of jobs.

And, in fact, your paper wrote an incredible editorial, for a change, that “Trump made a great deal for our country.”  That was a nice thing.  I was shocked to see it coming out of the Wall Street Journal.

Thank you all very much.  We'll see you tomorrow.  Thank you.  Thank you very much.

                        END                6:16 P.M. EDT