Saturday, February 20, 2021

February 17, 2021 Remarks by President Biden in a CNN Town Hall with Anderson Cooper Pabst Theater Milwaukee, Wisconsin (February 16, 2021)

 

The White House Logo
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
February 17, 2021
 
Remarks by President Biden in a CNN Town Hall with Anderson Cooper

Pabst Theater
Milwaukee, Wisconsin

(February 16, 2021)
 
7:59 P.M. CST
 
MR. COOPER:  And welcome.  We are live in the Pabst Theater in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.  This is a CNN Presidential Town Hall -- the first with President Joe Biden.  I’m Anderson Cooper.  President Biden is just four weeks into his presidency and facing multiple crises: nearly 500,000 of our fellow citizens -- Americans -- have died from COVID-19, millions out of work right now, and a nation dangerously divided.
 
Tonight, we're going to be answering questions from the American people.  The President will be answering questions from the American people on his first official trip since taking office.  Some of the questioners here voted for him.  Some did not. 
 
The President and I will not be wearing masks on this stage.  He, of course, has been vaccinated.  Over the past several weeks, I have repeatedly tested negative for coronavirus -- as recently as yesterday and this morning as well.  We will however be keeping our distance from one another, and the audience is very limited, socially distanced, and all wearing masks when they're seated.
 
With that, I want to welcome the 46th President of the United States, President Joe Biden.  (Applause.)
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Hey, Anderson.
 
MR. COOPER:  How are you, sir?
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Good to see you, man.  Hey, folks.  How are you?  (Applause.)  Good to be back, man.
 
MR. COOPER:  Yeah, it’s nice to see you, sir.
 
THE PRESIDENT:  And you know you enjoy being home with the baby more.  I don't want to hear this.
 
MR. COOPER:  (Laughs.)  I do.  Yes.  He’s nine and a half months, so I’m very happy.
 
THE PRESIDENT:  I get it.  No, no, everybody knows I like kids better than people.
 
MR. COOPER:  I saw a picture of you with your grandson recently.
 
THE PRESIDENT:  That's right.
 
MR. COOPER:  Yeah.  So we got a lot of questions in the audience.  We have about 50 or so people here.  They're all socially distanced.  We have some folks who voted for you, some folks who did not.  And we're going to get as many questions in as possible.
 
Before we get to that, I just want to start with a couple of just big-picture questions about the pandemic and where we are right now.
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Sure.
 
MR. COOPER:  New cases of COVID-19 hospitalizations have fallen by half in the last month, so have new cases.  That's the good news.  There's this potential threat -- potential surge from the variants coming down the pike potentially.  When is every American who wants it going to be able to get a vaccine?
 
THE PRESIDENT:  By the end of July of this year.  We have -- we came into office, there was only 50 million doses that were available.  We have now -- by the end of July, we'll have over 600 million doses -- enough to vaccinate every single American.
 
MR. COOPER:  When you say -- (applause) -- when you say “by the end of July,” do you mean that they will be available or that people will have been able to actually get them?  Because Dr. Fauci --
 
THE PRESIDENT:  They’ll be available.
 
MR. COOPER:  They'll be available.
 
THE PRESIDENT:  They’ll be available.
 
MR. COOPER:  Okay.
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Here, look, we -- what we did -- we got into office and found out the supply -- there was no backlog.  I mean, there was nothing in the refrigerator, figuratively and literally speaking, and there were 10 million doses a day that were available.
 
We've upped that, in the first three weeks that we were in office, to significantly more than that.  We’ve moved out -- went to the Pfizer and Moderna, and said, “Can you produce more vaccine and more rapidly?”  They not only agreed to go from 200 to 400 -- and they've agreed to go to 600 million doses.  And that's -- and they're -- and we got them to move up the time because we used the National Defense Act to be able to help the manufacturing piece of it to get more equipment and so on.
 
MR. COOPER:  So if, end of April -- excuse me, end of July, they're available to actually get them in the arms of people who want them, that will take -- what? -- a couple more months?
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Well, no, a lot will be being vaccinated in the meantime.
 
MR. COOPER:  Okay.
 
THE PRESIDENT:  In other words, it’s not all of a sudden 600 million doses are going to appear.  And what's going to happen is: It's going to continue to increase as we move along, and we'll have -- we’ll have reached 400 million by the end of May and 600 million by the middle of -- by the end of July.
 
And the biggest thing, though, as you remember when you and I -- no, I shouldn't say it that way, “as you remember” -- but when you and I talked last, we talked about -- it's one thing to have the vaccine, which we didn't have when we came into office, but a vaccinator -- how do you get the vaccine into someone's arm?  So you need the paraphernalia.  You need the needle, and you need mechanisms to be able to get it in.  You have to have people who can inject it into people’s arms.
 
MR. COOPER:  That's been one of the problems is just getting enough people.
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Yes, now we have -- we have made significant strides increasing the number of vaccinators.  I've -- I issued an executive order allowing former retired docs and nurses to do it.  We have over 1,000 military personnel.  The CDC is -- I mean, excuse me, the -- we have gotten the National Guard engaged.
 
So we have significant number of vaccinators -- people who would actually be there.  Plus, we've opened up a considerable number of locations where you can get the vaccination.
 
MR. COOPER:  I want to introduce you to Kevin Michel.  He's an independent from Wauwatosa.  He's a mechanical engineer for a vehicle company.
 
Kevin, welcome.  What's your question?
 
AUDIENCE MEMBER:  Hi, welcome to Milwaukee.
 
THE PRESIDENT:  How you doing?
 
AUDIENCE MEMBER:  Good.  My question is regarding education.
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Yes. 
 
AUDIENCE MEMBER:  And considering that hybrid and virtual school instruction have been in place for nearly a year now, what is the plan and recommendation to get students back into the brick-and-mortar buildings?  As a parent of four children, I find it imperative that they get back to school as safely as possible.
 
THE PRESIDENT:  My mother would say, “God bless you, son.”  No purgatory for you -- four kids home.  I really mean it.  And, by the way, the loss of being able to be in school is having significant impact on the children and parents as well. 
 
And so, what we found out is, there are certain things that make it rational and easy to go back to the brick-and-mortar building.  One, first of all, making sure everybody is wearing protective gear -- it's available to students, as well as to teachers, the janitors, the people who work in the cafeteria, the bus drivers.
 
Secondly, organizing in smaller pods, which means that’s why we need more teachers.  Instead of a classroom of 30 kids in it, you have three classes and that same -- of 10 kids each in those.  And I’m -- I'm not making the number up; it might be less.  It doesn't have to be literally 10. 
 
In addition to that, we also have indicated that it is much better, it's much easier to send kids K-through-8 back because they are less likely to communicate the disease to somebody else.  But because kids in -- sophomores, juniors, and seniors in high school -- they socialize a lot more, and they're older, and they transmit more than young kids do, it's harder to get those schools open without having everything from the ventilation systems and -- and having --
 
For example, school bus drivers -- you know, we -- we got to make sure that you don't have 60 kids, or however many there -- depending on the size of school bus -- sitting two abreast in every single seat.
 
And so there's a lot of things we can do, short of -- and I think that we should be vaccinating teachers.  We should move them up in the hierarchy as well.  (Applause.)
 
MR. COOPER:  Well, let me ask you, you -- your administration had set a goal to open the majority of schools in your first 100 days.  You're now saying that means those schools may only be open for at least one day a week.
 
THE PRESIDENT:  No, that's not true.  That's what was reported; that's not true.  There was a mistake in the communication.  But what I -- what I'm talking about is I said opening the majority of schools in K-through-eighth grade because they're the easiest to open, the most needed to be opened, in terms of the impact on children and families having to stay home.
 
MR. COOPER:  So when do you think that would be -- K-through-8, at least five days a week if possible?
 
THE PRESIDENT:  I think we'll be close to that at the end of the first 100 days.  We’ve had a significant percentage of them being able to be opened.  My -- my guess is they're going to probably be pushing to open all for -- all summer -- to continue like it's a different semester (inaudible).
 
MR. COOPER:  Do you think that would be five days a week or just a couple?
 
THE PRESIDENT:  I think -- I think many of them are five days a week.  The goal will be five days a week.  Now, it's going to be harder to open up the high schools for the reasons I said -- just like, if you notice, the contagion factor in colleges is much higher than it is in high schools or grade schools.
 
MR. COOPER:  I want you to meet -- this is Justin Belot.  He’s a high school teacher from Milwaukee who's a Democrat.  Justin, thanks for being with us.  What's your question?
 
THE PRESIDENT:  What do you teach?
 
AUDIENCE MEMBER:  I teach English.  High school English. 
 
THE PRESIDENT:  My wife teaches.  God love you.
 
AUDIENCE MEMBER:  Wonderful.  Thank you, Mr. President.  So along the same lines of schools, so this great debate on when to transition to in-person learning: While there are numerous warnings not to be in large groups or to have dinner parties or small parties, why is it okay to put students and teachers in close proximity to each other for an entire day, day after day?  With large class sizes and outdated ventilation systems, how and when do you propose this to occur?  And finally, do you believe all staff should be vaccinated before doing so?
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Number one, nobody is suggesting, including the CDC in this recent out report, that you have large classes, congested classes.  It's smaller classes; more ventilation; making sure that everybody has masks and is socially distanced, meaning you have less -- fewer students in one room; making sure that everyone from the sanitation workers who work in the -- in the lavatories, in the bathrooms, and do the -- and do the -- all the maintenance, that they are in fact able to be protected as well.  Making sure you're in a situation where you don't have the congregation of a lot of people -- as I said, including the school bus, including getting on a school bus.
 
So it's about needing to be able to socially distance, smaller classes, more protection.  And I think the teachers and the folks who work in the school -- the cafeteria workers and others -- should be on the list of preferred to get a vaccination.
 
MR. COOPER:  I want to introduce you to Kerri Engebrecht, an independent from Oak Creek.
 
Kerri, welcome.  Go ahead.
 
AUDIENCE MEMBER:  Thank you.
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Kerri, how are you?
 
AUDIENCE MEMBER:  Very good, thank you.  Our 19-year-old son was diagnosed with pediatric COPD at the age of 14.  We're told he has the lungs of a 60-year-old.  He does all he can to protect himself.  Last month, he even removed himself from the campus of UW-Madison, as he feels it's safer and he has less exposure here at home.
 
We've tried all we can to get him a vaccine.  I hear of others who are less vulnerable getting it based on far less.  Do you have a plan to vaccinate those who are most vulnerable sooner, to give them a priority?
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Well, the answer is: Yes, there are. 
 
But here’s how it works: The states make the decision on who is -- or in what order.  I can make recommendations, and for federal programs, I can do that as President of the United States.  But I can't tell the state, "You must move such and such a group of people up."
 
But here's what I’d like to do: If you're willing, I'll stay around after this is over, and maybe we can talk a few minutes and see if I can get you some help.  (Applause.)
 
MR. COOPER:  Let -- let me just ask you, though: Johnson & Johnson could be authorized -- a new vaccine from them could be authorized in a couple of weeks.  That would be a big deal --
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Yes, it would.
 
MR. COOPER:  -- bringing a lot more vaccines on, millions of more doses to the supply.  Once that happens, given the urgency of these variants, and the potential threat from them, should states stop giving priority to certain groups and just open vaccine access for everyone?
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Well, it depends on how much they have available.  I think there still should be priority groups in case there are not enough for everyone, every- -- available to everybody. 
 
And, look, we don't know for certain.  Let me tell you what my national COVID team has said: that the variants, the -- by "variants," you mean the Brazilian strain, the South African strain, the British strain --
 
MR. COOPER:  London.  Yeah.
 
THE PRESIDENT:  -- and London, et cetera.  There's thus far -- thus far, there is no evidence that the existing vaccinations available for Moderna and Pfizer do not either make sure that they apply -- they work as well against the strain in the United States.  And there is no evidence that they're not helpful. 
 
So if you can get a vaccination, get it whenever you can get it, regardless of the other strains that are out there. There are studies going on to determine it is not only more communicable, but are there vaccine -- do the vaccines not provide helpful protection by getting the vaccine.  There are some speculation.  I shouldn't -- I got to be very careful -- right? -- because millions of people are watching this.  It may be that a certain vaccination for a certain strain may reduce from 95 percent to a lower percentage of certainty that it will keep you from getting --
 
MR. COOPER:  It may not be as effective as --
 
THE PRESIDENT:  It may not be as effective.
 
MR. COOPER:  -- against a variant, but it still would be effective.
 
THE PRESIDENT:  It’d still be effective.  So the clear notion is: If you're eligible, if it's available, get the vaccine.  Get the vaccine.
 
MR. COOPER:  I want you to meet -- this is Dessie Levy, a Democrat from Milwaukee.  She's a registered nurse, former academic dean.  She's also currently director of a faith-based nonprofit. 
 
Dessie, welcome.
 
THE PRESIDENT:  By the way -- you’ve heard me say this before, Becky [sic] -- if there's any angels in heaven, they're all nurses, male and female.  Doctors let you live, nurses make you want to live.  I can tell you as a consumer of healthcare -- my family.  You're wonderful.  Thank you for what you do.
 
AUDIENCE MEMBER:  God bless you.  Mr. President, hello.  My name is Dr. Dessie Levy.  And my question to you is: Considering COVID-19 and its significant impact on black Americans, especially here in Milwaukee, and thus the exacerbation of our racial disparities in healthcare, we have seen less than 3 percent of blacks and less than 5 percent of Hispanics, given the total number of vaccines that have been administered to this point.  Is this a priority for the Biden administration?  And how will the disparities be addressed?  And that’s both locally and nationally.
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Well, first of all, it is a priority, number one. 
 
Number two, there's two reasons for it being the way it is.  Number one, there is some history of blacks being used as guinea pigs and other experiments -- I need not tell you, Doctor -- over the last 50 to 75 to 100 years in America.  So there's a -- there is a concern about getting the vaccine, whether it's available or not. 
 
But the biggest part of it is access -- physical access.  That's why, last week, I opened up -- I met with the Black Caucus in the United States Congress and agreed that I would -- all -- all of the fed- -- all of the community health centers now, which take care of the toughest of the toughest neighborhoods in terms of illness, they are going to get a million doses, you know, a week, in how we're going to move forward, because they're in the neighborhood.
 
Secondly, we have opened up -- and I'm making sure that there's doses of vaccine for over 6,700 pharmacies, because almost everyone lives within not always walking distance, but within the distance of being able to go to the pharmacy, like when you got your flu shot.  That is also now being opened.
 
Thirdly, I also am providing for mobile -- mobile vans, mobile units to go into neighborhoods that are hard to get to because people are on -- for example, even though everyone is within, you know, basically five miles of a Walgreens, let's say, the fact is, if you're 70 years old, you don't have a vehicle, and you live in a tough neighborhood -- meaning you're -- it's a high concentration of COVID -- you're not likely to be able to walk five miles to go get a vaccine. 
 
The other thing we found is -- and I'm sorry to go on, but this is really important to me.  The other part -- portion is, a lot of people don't know how to register.  Not everybody in the community -- in the Hispanic and the African American community, particularly in rural areas that are distant and/or inner-city districts -- know how to use -- know how to get online to determine how to get in line for that COVID vaccination at the Walgreens or at the particular store.
 
So we're also -- I've committed to spend a billion dollars on public education to help people figure out how they can get in there.  That's why we're also trying to set up mass vaccination centers, like places in stadiums and the like.
 
MR. COOPER:  Are you concerned about the rollout of this online?  Because it has been incredibly confusing for a lot of people, not just --
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Sure.
 
MR. COOPER:  -- you know, older people.  It's younger people just trying to find a place to get a vaccine.
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Yes.  And I have.  Because look -- look what we inherited: We inherited a circumstance here, where -- and now for the first -- we did a lot in the first two weeks -- a circumstance where, number one, there weren't many vaccinators.  You didn't know where you could go get a vaccine administered to you because there was no one to put it in your arm -- number one. 
 
Number two, there was very little federal guidance; it’s to say, what to look for, how to find out where, in fact, you could go.  You can go online, and every single state now has a slightly different mechanism by which they say who's qualified, where you can get the vaccines, and so on. 
 
So it's all about trying to more rationalize in detail so ordinary people, like me, can understand.  I mean that sincerely.  I mean, I'm not -- my -- you know, my grandchildren can use that online -- you know, make me look like I'm in, you know, the seventh century. 
 
But all kidding aside, so this is a process, and it's going to take time.  It took us a -- think of what we didn't do.  And you and I talked about this during the campaign.  We didn't do from the time it hit the -- it hit the United States.  "You're going to inject something in your arm, it’s going to go away." "You're going to be in a -- it'll all be done by Easter."
 
We wasted so much time.  So much time.
 
MR. COOPER:  Another question about vaccines.  This is Jessica Salas.  She's an independent from the Milwaukee, a graphic designer. 
 
Jessica, welcome.
 
AUDIENCE MEMBER:  Hi, thank you.  As we've been talking about, the coronavirus is very real and very scary.  And it's especially scary for children who may or may not understand.  My children, Layla -- eight, here -- and my son Matteo -- seven, at home -- often ask if they will catch COVID, and if they do, will they die.  They are watching as others get the vaccine, and they would like to know when will kids be able to get the vaccine.
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Well first of all, honey -- what’s your first name?
 
LAYLA SALAS:  Layla.
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Layla.  Beautiful name.  First of all, kids don't get the vacci- -- get COVID very often.  It's unusual for that to happen.  They don't -- they -- and there -- the evidence so far is, children aren't the people most likely to get COVID -- number one. 
 
Number two, we haven't even done tests yet on children as to whether or not the certain vaccines would work or not work, or what is needed.  So that's -- so you -- you're the safest group of people in the whole world -- number one. 
 
Number two, you're not likely to be able to be exposed to something and spread it to mommy or daddy.  And it's not likely mommy and daddy are able to spread it to you either.  So I wouldn't worry about it, baby.  I promise you.  But I know it’s, kind of, worrisome.  Are you in first grade, second grade?
 
LAYLA SALAS:  Second.
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Oh, you're getting old.  (Laughter.) Second grade.  Well, has your school -- have you been in school, honey?
 
LAYLA SALAS:  No.
 
THE PRESIDENT:  No.  See, that's -- that's, kind of, a scary thing too: You don't get to go to school; you don't get to see your friends. 
 
And so what a lot of kids -- and I mean -- and big people too, older people -- they just -- their whole lives have, sort of, changed, like when it used to be.  It used to be, let’s go outside and play with your friends and get in the school bus and go to school, and everything was normal.  And now, when things change, people get really worried and scared.  But don't be scared, honey.  Don't be scared.  You're going to be fine.  And we're going to make sure mommy is fine too.
 
MR. COOPER:  You know, let me ask you -- (applause) -- let me ask you, just for folks who are watching out there -- there are a lot of people who are scared, and there's a lot of people --
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Sure.
 
MR. COOPER:  -- who are hurting.  When do you think this pandemic is -- I mean, when are we -- when is it going to be done?  When are we going to get back to normal?
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Well, you know, all the experts, all the committee that I put together of the leading researchers in the world and in the United States who are on this committee of mine, headed by Dr. Fauci and others, they tell me: Be careful not to predict things that you don't know for certain what's going to happen because then you'll be held accountable.  I get that. 
 
But let me tell you what I think based on all that I've learned and all that I've studied and all that I think that I know.  It's fairly -- it's a high probability that the vaccinations that are available today -- and the new one, Johnson & Johnson, God willing -- will prove to be useful; that with those vaccinations, the ability to continue to spread the disease is going to diminish considerably because of what they call “herd immunity.”  And now they're saying somewhere around 70 percent of the people have to constitute; some people said 50, 60.  But a significant number have to be in a position where they are -- they have been vaccinated and/or they've been through it and --
 
MR. COOPER:  Have antibodies.
 
THE PRESIDENT:  And have antibodies.
 
And so, if that works that way -- as my mother would say, with the grace of God and the goodwill of the neighbors -- that by next Christmas, I think we'll be in a very different circumstance, God willing, than we are today.  I think a year from now, when it's 22 below zero here -- (laughter) -- no, a year from now, I think that there'll be significantly fewer people having to be socially distanced, have to wear masks, et cetera.  But we don't know. 
 
So I don't want to over-promise anything here.  I told you when I ran and when I got elected: I will always level with you.  To use Franklin Roosevelt's example, I'll shoot to give it “straight from the shoulder” -- straight from the shoulder what I know and what I don't know.
 
We don't know for certain, but it is highly unlikely that by the beginning of next year’s school -- traditional school year in September, we are not significantly better off than we are today, but it matters.  It matters whether you continue to wear that mask.  It matters whether you continue to socially distance.  It matters whether you wash your hands with hot water.  It -- those things matter.  They matter.  And that can save a lot of lives while we're getting to this point, we get to herd immunity. 
 
MR. COOPER:  You’ve made -- (applause) -- you’ve made passing a COVID relief bill the focus of your first 100 days.  Those on the right say the proposal is too big; some on the left say it’s not big enough.  Are you committed to passing a $1.9 trillion bill, or is that final number still up for negotiation? 
 
THE PRESIDENT:  I'm committed to pass- -- look, here's -- some of you are probably economists or college professors or you’re teaching in school.  This is the first time in my career -- and as you can tell, I'm over 30 -- the first time in my career that there is a consensus among economists left, right, and center that is over- -- and including the IMF and in Europe -- that the overwhelming consensus is: In order to grow the economy a year or two, three, and four down the line, we can't spend too much.  Now is the time we should be spending.  Now is the time to go big. 
 
You may recall I managed the last experiment we had with stimulus, and it was 800 -- (applause) -- no, I don't mean it that way, but it was $800 billion.  We thought we needed more than that.  And we think we did.  We got -- we were -- it ended up working, but it slowed things up by about -- and it, depending who you talked to -- between six months and a year and a half.
 
We can come back -- we can come roaring back.  It's estimated that if we -- by most economists, including Wall Street firms, as well as -- as -- as, you know, think tanks -- political think tanks -- left, right, and center -- it is estimated that if we pass this bill alone, we’ll create 7 million jobs this year.  Seven million jobs this year.  (Applause.)
 
And so the thing we haven't talked about -- and I'm not going to go on because I want to hear your question, and I apologize -- we haven't talked about -- I remember you and I talking during the campaign, and you had the former guy saying that, “Well, you know, we’re just going to open things up, and that's all we need to do.”  We said, “No, you got to deal with the disease before you deal with the -- with getting the economy going.” 
 
Well, the fact is that the economy now has to be dealt with.  And what is -- look at all the people.  You have over 10 million people unemployed.  We need unemployment insurance.  We need to make sure that, you know, you have -- 40 percent of the children in America are -- talk about food shortage -- 60 percent of -- did you ever think you'd see a day, Milwaukee -- you'd see in the last six months, people lining up in their automobiles for an hour, for as far as you can see, to get a bag of food?  What -- I mean, this is the United States of America, for God's sake.  We can't deal with that? 
 
We promised -- look at all the people who are on the verge of being kicked out of their apartments because they cannot afford -- they cannot afford the rent.  What happens when that happens?  Everything (inaudible).  Look at all the mom-and-pop landlords that are in real trouble if we don't subsidize this in the meantime.  Look at all the people who are on the verge of missing -- and how many people have missed their last two mortgage payments and are able to be foreclosed on.  That's why I took executive action to say they cannot be foreclosed on in the meantime.  Because look at what the impact on the economy would be.  You think it’s bad now, let all that happen. 
 
Look at all the people who've lost their insurance.  How many -- I'm not asking for a show of hands.  How many of you had jobs with corporations or companies that provided healthcare?  The COBRA healthcare.  Well, guess what?  The company goes under, and guess what?  You lose your health insurance.  Well, we should be making sure you're able to pay for that so that we keep people moving. 
 
So there's a lot -- so I think bigger.  And the vast majority of serious people say bigger is better now, not spending less.
 
MR. COOPER:  This is -- this is Randy Lange, an independent who supported Donald Trump in 2020.  Randy is the co-owner of a woodworking company here in Milwaukee. 
 
Randy, welcome. 
 
AUDIENCE MEMBER:  Good evening.  You’re proposing a $15 minimum wage.  Given the lower cost of living, specifically in the Midwest, many business owners are concerned that this will put them out of business, forcing them to downsize or cut benefits.  How can you instill confidence in small businesses that this will benefit the Midwest business growth? 
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Well, first of all, the South is not much different than the Midwest in that regard as well.  But here's the thing: If you look back over the last 40 years, as minimum wages increased, people haven't -- the end -- the end result of net employment hasn't changed.  The vast majority of economists -- and there are studies that show that by increasing the minimum wage to $15 an hour, it could have an impact on -- on a number of businesses, but it would be de minimis, et cetera. 
 
Here's the deal: It's about doing it gradually.  We're at $7.25 an hour.  No one should work 40 hours a week and live in poverty.  No one should work 40 hours a week and live in poverty.  (Applause.)  But it's totally legitimate for small-business owners to be concerned about how that changes.  For example, if it went -- if we gradually increased it -- when we indexed it at $7.20, if we kept it indexed by -- to inflation, people would be making 20 bucks an hour right now.  That's what it would be.
 
MR. COOPER:  The Congressional Budget Office says that a $15 minimum wage would lift 900,000 people out of poverty but would also cause 1.4 million people their jobs.  Is that --
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Yes, but there's also -- if you read that whole thing about Pinocchios and all the rest -- there are also an equal number of studies that say that's not -- that wouldn't have that effect, and particularly as you do it in terms of how gradually you do it.  So let's say -- you said you're going to increase the minimum wage from $7.25 an hour, between now and the year 2025, to $12 an hour, to $13 -- you double someone's pay -- and the impact on business would be absolutely diminished, and it would grow the GDP, and it would grow and it would generate economic growth. 
 
But it's not illegitimate as a small-business person to worry about whether or not increasing it at one fell swoop would have that impact.  I do support a $15 minimum wage.  I think there is equally as much, if not more, evidence to dictate that it would grow the economy and, long run and medium run, benefit small businesses as well as large businesses, and it would not have such a dilatory effect.  But that's a debatable issue.
 
MR. COOPER:  I want you to meet another small-business owner.  This is Tim Eichinger, a Democrat from Milwaukee, co- owner of Black Husky Brewing.
 
Tim, welcome.
 
AUDIENCE MEMBER:  Thank you.  My partner and I own a small brewery in the Riverwest neighborhood of Milwaukee, and we have nine amazing employees.  We rely primarily on selling our beer out of our tap room.  And with the pandemic, our business has gone down about 50 percent.  Now, we've relied primarily on loans, grants, as well as our own reserves to survive.  However, the new assistance has been too slow, and recently it's gotten more restrictive on how we can apply it.  What will you do so that small mom-and-pop businesses like ours will survive over large corporate entities?
 
     THE PRESIDENT:  Change it drastically, first of all, by making sure we have inspectors general.  You may remember when the first bill passed, you may remember there was a guy running, saying, “What's going to happen is the banks aren't going to lend you the money.  They're going to ask you a question, ‘Do you have your credit with us?  How many loans do you have with us?  What is your -- what credit cards do you have with us?  How…”  Because even though they were being underwritten, and we bailed their rear ends out -- last time out, they weren't -- it was too much trouble to lend to you. 
 
What did the President do?  And I don't want to pick on the Pres- -- I shouldn’t -- I don't -- I'm tired of talking about Donald Trump.  I don't want to talk about him anymore.  But the last administration spent time -- a lot of time talking about how there was no need for inspector generals.  We find out that 40 percent of the money -- the PPE loans to go to -- PP -- PPP loans that go to small businesses went to -- went to corporations that were multimillion-dollar corporations.  And you’re going to see an investigation showing that a lot of this was fraudulent where it went. 
 
So what I'm doing is I’m providing $60 billion for you to be able to make capital investments in order to be able to open safely and make sure you're in a position that you can do the things that are recommended.  If you’ve noticed, there's been very little federal direction for you all as to how to safely open your businesses.  Yet, you know, if you're able to test your employees, if you're able to be in a situation if you -- if you serve people, you have Plexiglas dividers; if you -- a whole range.  If you’re able to have everybody with a -- with a mask and the like, you can do so much to safely open, but you don't get that direction. 
 
So, the money, I guarantee you, is going to go to small businesses with people.  And I'm shooting -- and, by the way, the original definition of a small businesses is 500 or fewer employees.  Well, that's not what I mean by small businesses.  What we meant by small business is the mom-and-pop businesses that hold communities together and keep people together, and particularly in neighborhoods where if you don't have a beauty shop, a barber shop, a hardware store, a grocery store, et cetera, the center of the community begins to disintegrate some.
 
So what I’d like to do is, if you are willing to give me an address, lay out for you precisely -- without taking more time, I'm going to get in trouble; I’m supposed only took two minutes in an answer -- is to let you know exactly how that $60 billion in part of the recovery package will go to small businesses.  (Applause.)
 
MR. COOPER:  Right.  We’re going to take a quick break.  When we get back, we'll have more questions for the President of the United States, Joe Biden.  We'll be right back.
 
(Commercial break begins.)
 
(Commercial break concludes.)
 
MR. COOPER:  And welcome back.  We’re live at a CNN Town Hall Event at the Pabst Theater in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, with President Joe Biden.  We are back. 
 
Thanks so much for -- for being here.  We -- before we get back into -- to the audience, I want to ask just a question about what we just witnessed. 
 
Before the Senate voted to acquit the former President in the impeachment trial, you said you were anxious to see if Republican senators would stand up.  Only seven did.  House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called the rest “cowards.”  Do you agree with her?
 
THE PRESIDENT:  I'm not going to call names out.  I -- look, I -- for four years, all that's been in the news is Trump.  The next four years, I want to make sure all in the news is the American people.  I'm tired of talking about Trump.  (Applause.)  It’s done.
 
MR. COOPER:  Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said that the former President is, quote, “still liable for everything he did while he was in office.”  If your Department of Justice wanted to investigate him, would you allow them to proceed?
 
THE PRESIDENT:  I made it clear: One of the things about -- one of the most serious pieces of damage done by the last administration was the politic- -- the politicizing of the Justice Department.  Any of you who are lawyers know -- whether you're a Democrat, Republican, conservative, or liberal -- it has been more politicized than any Justice Department in American history.  I made a commitment: I will not ever tell my Justice Department -- and it's not mine; it’s the people’s Justice Department -- who they should and should not prosecute.  Their prosecutorial decisions will be left to the Justice Department, not me.  (Applause.)
 
MR. COOPER:  I want you to meet Joel Berkowitz from Shorewood.  He is a Democrat, a professor of Foreign Languages and Literature at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
 
Joel, thanks for being here.
 
AUDIENCE MEMBER:  Thank you, Anderson.
 
THE PRESIDENT:  I’m not bad at the literature part, but after five years of French, I still can’t speak a word.  So I apologize.  (Laughter.) 
 
AUDIENCE MEMBER:  I’ll teach you some Yiddish sometime.  How’s that?
 
THE PRESIDENT:  I -- hey, by the way, I understand a little bit of Yiddish.  (Laughter.) 
 
AUDIENCE MEMBER:  I’m sure you do. 
 
MR. COOPER:  It would be a shonda if you didn’t.  But -- (Laughter.)
 
AUDIENCE MEMBER:  More seriously, Mr. President, like millions of my fellow citizens, I was shaken by the attack on the Capitol on January 6th, and on our democracy more broadly, by your predecessor and his followers.  While I appreciate efforts being made to bring them to justice, I worry about ongoing threats to our country from Americans who embrace white supremacy and conspiracies that align with it.  What can your administration do to address this complex and wide-ranging problem?
 
THE PRESIDENT:  It is complex, it’s wide ranging, and it’s real.  You may -- I got involved in politics to begin with because of civil rights and opposition to white supremacists, the Ku Klux Klan.  And the most dangerous people in America continue to exist.  That is the greatest threat to terror in America: domestic terror. 
 
And so I would make sure that my Justice Department and the Civil Rights Division is focused heavily on those very folks.  And I would make sure that we, in fact, focus on how to deal with the rise of white supremacy.  And you see what's happening -- and the studies that are beginning to be done, maybe at your university as well -- about the impact of former military, former police officers, on the growth of white supremacy in some of these groups. 
 
You may remember in one of my debates with the former President, I asked him to condemn the Proud Boys.  He wouldn't do it.  He said, “Stand by.  Stand ready.”  Or whatever the phrasing exactly was.  It is a bane on our existence.  It has always been.  As Lincoln said, “We have to appeal to our better angels.”  And these guys are not -- and women -- are, in fact, demented.  They are dangerous people.
 
MR. COOPER:  I want you to meet James Lewis, an independent from Milwaukee.  He's a labor attorney. 
 
James, welcome.
 
THE PRESIDENT:  James, if I say anything you don’t like, let me know right away, will you? 
 
AUDIENCE MEMBER:  All right.  You’re all right.
 
THE PRESIDENT:  About as big as a mountain.
 
AUDIENCE MEMBER:  Good evening, President Biden.  I was a public defender in Kenosha County when the police shot Jacob Blake.  I witnessed the city I worked in burned and devastated.  And recently, District Attorney Michael Graveley denied to prosecute the police officers responsible. 
 
So my question to you is: What will your administration do to correct these wrongs that we witnessed not just in Kenosha, but across this country?  And what will we do to bridge the gap between communities and their police? 
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Three things.  First of all, I was a public defender as well, and I think it's high time that we had public defenders being paid the same as prosecutors.  My son, by the way, was a great prosecutor; he was the attorney general of the state of Delaware, and he was a federal prosecutor before that.    And so I'm not condemning all prosecutors, but I am saying that it matters that you have adequate defense and you are able to attract people who, in fact, can live on being able to be that public defender -- number one. 
 
Number two -- we are pushing very hard, and I think we'll get it done -- is the legislation relating to what is appropriate police behavior and studying police behavior, and coming down with recommendations that are consistent with the legislation that was put in place as a consequence of all the world seeing one man shoved up against the curb and murdered after 8 minutes and 46 seconds. 
 
And so there's a number of things relating to everything from no-knock warrants and -- and a whole range of things you know.  But there’s legislation that’s being introduced separately.  I hope it will pass.
 
But thirdly, I think we have to deal with systemic racism that exists throughout society.  And one of the things I'm going to recommend there is that we look at an entire panoply of things that affect whether or not people of color, primarily, are -- are treated differently.  And that goes through everything from prosecutorial discretion -- you know, as a public defender what, by that, I mean.  What happens is -- it’ll take too long to go through the whole explanation, but let me do it -- try to go quickly. 
 
What happens now is, if you in fact are going to -- you arrest someone because they had -- and you want to charge them, you can charge them with robbery or armed robbery.  If you charge them with armed robbery, you get a lot more time than if you don't charge with robbery.  But if you want to make sure that someone who doesn't know much about their representation is able to (inaudible), you engage in prosecutorial misconduct by offering them to plead to, essentially -- it’s not the same -- burglary, which gets them two years in probation and -- so you don’t even get a trial.  You plead because you don’t have adequate representation.  You feel like everything is against you, and you're in trouble.  When I did the sentencing act, that was designed to keep -- make sure we had the same time for the same crime.
 
As chairman of the Judiciary Committee, I looked at all 10 federal districts -- and we took six months to do it -- and found out if you're black, and you -- or your first-time offense of being accused of burglary -- and maybe you committed it and you were white and you did the same exact crime -- in all 10 districts throughout the United States of America, a person -- and don't hold me to the exact numbers, but the percentages are right -- if you're a first-time white guy, you'd get two years; you’d get seven years if you were black.
 
So in order to make sure that you could not send people to jail for the same crime, I came up with this pr- -- this Sentencing Commission, which said that you -- everybody who commits the crime has to receive between -- instead of zero to 20 years, you drastically cut down the number of years you could go to jail.  But say you have to -- if you -- if it's a one -- first-time offense, you have to get sentenced between one and a half and three years.  Okay?
 
Well, what happens is prosecutors use that as a mechanism to send people to jail.  It makes it look like they're -- we're dealing with mandatory sentencing, which it wasn't designed to do at all.  It was designed to make sure that people were treated fairly. 
 
There's much -- I'm sorry to go on.  There's much more to talk about, but --
 
MR. COOPER:  Yeah.  We actually have a related question over here.  This is Dannie Evans, a pastor in Janesville, who works as a supervisor for the juvenile justice diversion program in Rock County.  He's an independent, voted for Donald Trump in 2020.  He's also a member the state's 32-member Racial Disparity Task Force, created in the wake of the Jacob Blake shooting last summer. 
 
Dannie, welcome.
 
AUDIENCE MEMBER:  Good afternoon, Mr. President.  “Defund the Police” is discussed as an option for reforming policing; however, there are communities where people live in fear not of the police, but in fear of the violent gangs who commit crimes --
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Exactly.
 
AUDIENCE MEMBER:  -- in those neighborhoods.  How can we be sure that we don't over-legislate police officers so that they can’t do their job to protect the law-abiding citizens who live in these high-crime neighborhoods, and yet train officers to police with compassion?
 
THE PRESIDENT:  By, number one, not defunding the police.  We have to put more money in police work so we have legitimate community policing and we're in a situation where we change the legislation.  No one should go to jail for a drug offense.  No one should go to jail for the use of a drug.  They should go to drug rehabilitation.  (Applause.)  Drug rehabilitation.  Number one. 
 
We should be in a position where we change the system -- of sentencing system -- to one that relates to a notion of -- they start telling you to -- as related to making sure that what you do is you focus on making sure that there's rehabilitation.
 
The idea that we don't have people in prison systems learning how to be -- spending the money -- learning how to be mechanics, learning how to be cooks, learning how to have a profession when you get out; the idea that we deny someone, who served their time, access to Pell Grants, access to housing, access to -- right now, as you well know, most places you get out of prison, you get 25 bucks and a bus ticket.  You end up back under the bridge exactly where you were before. 
 
And the fact is that -- the concern in many minority communities is black-on-black, Hispanic-on-Hispanic, not just --
 
But here's the deal: There has to be much more serious --how can I say it? -- much more serious determination as to what the background and the attitudes of the recruit is, where -- what their views are.  There should be much more psychological testing, like you would if you're going to the intelligence community.  What is it?  What are the things that make you respond the way you do?  Because there is -- there is inherent prejudice built into the system as well. 
 
And we also need to provide for -- and it's happening -- more African American and more Hispanic police officers.  And, by the way, they don't get it all right either, by a long shot.  But every cop, when they get up in the morning and put on that shield, has a right to expect to be able to go home to their family that night.  Conversely, every kid walking across the street wearing a hoodie is not a member of a gang and is about to knock somebody off.  (Applause.)
 
So it's about education.  I’d love to talk to you more about it because it's -- it is the answer, in my view -- that and education -- actually, access to education. 
 
And one of the things that I talk a lot about -- and I'm sorry to go on about this, but it's important: I don't think we can look at opportunity in the Af- -- let's stick with African American community for a minute -- in terms of the criminal justice system.  That is only one small piece of why people are the way they are.  You realize -- I don't know what home you live in, but if you go ahead and you want to get insurance, and you're in a black neighborhood, you're going to pay more for the same insurance that I'm going to pay for the exact same home.  Your car -- you never had an accident in your car.  If you live in a black neighborhood, you're going to pay a higher premium on your car.  You're going to --
 
So, there's so many things that are built in institutionally that disadvantage African Americans and Latinos that we -- in fact, I think -- and one of the great advantages -- I'm sorry, but one of the great advantages -- as bad as things are -- I keep reading from presidential historians how I've inherited the worst situation since Lincoln, worse than Roosevelt, because -- economic crisis, political crisis, racial crisis, et cetera.
 
But the fact is that everyone has gotten a close-up look now and seen what's happened.  That kid -- that kid holding that camera for 8 minutes and 46 seconds awakened the whole world.  When I met with his little daughter, after he was dead, she said, "My Daddy has changed the world."  Guess what?  Not only here in the United States.  Around the world, people said, "Whoa, I didn't know that happened." 
 
Dr. King -- when my generation -- when I got involved in the Civil Rights Movement as a high school student in the early '60s -- and you had Bull Connor and his dogs in the late '50s sicking on those ladies going to -- in their black dresses going to church -- and little kids and fire hoses ripping their skin off.  He said, "What happened there was -- it was a second emancipation."  Because people in places where there weren't black communities said, "That really happens?  I didn't believe it."  They saw it happen.  And so it generated the -- the Voting Rights Act.  It generated the Civil Rights Act.  And he called it the "Second Emancipation."  We have a chance now -- a chance now to make significant change in racial disparities. 
 
And I'm going to say something that’s going to get me in trouble, which -- I couldn't go through the whole show without doing that.  And that is that -- think about it: If you want to know where the American public is, look at the money being spent in advertising.  Did you ever, five years ago, think every second or third ad out of five or six you'd turn on would be biracial couples?  (Applause.)
 
No, no, I'm not -- I'm not being fac- -- the reason I'm so hopeful is this new generation -- they're not like us.  They're thinking differently.  They're more open.  And we got to take advantage of it.  (Applause.)
 
MR. COOPER:  I want you to -- (applause) --
 
THE PRESIDENT:  I'm sorry.
 
MR. COOPER:  I want you to meet LuVerda Martin, a Democrat from Mequon or Mequan [sic].  
 
AUDIENCE MEMBER:  Mequon. 
 
MR. COOPER:  Mequon, sorry.  LuVerda is a certified nurse, midwife. 
 
Welcome.
 
AUDIENCE MEMBER:  Good evening, Mr. President.
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Good evening.
 
AUDIENCE MEMBER:  Our nation's experiences with and through COVID-19 and other recent tragedies have strengthened the foundation of division among Americans.  What are your immediate and tangible plans to address how deeply divided we are as a nation?
 
THE PRESIDENT:  I take issue with what everybody says about the division.  For example, my plan on COVID: 69 percent of the American people support it -- 69.  In this state -- recent poll -- 60 percent.  Sixty percent.  Forty-five percent of Trump voters and fifty-five percent of Republican voters.  The nation is not divided.  You go out there and take a look and talk to people.  You have fringes on both ends, but it's not nearly as divided as we make it out to be.  And we have to bring it together. 
 
You may remember how -- trouble I get in.  I said there were three reasons I was running: One, to restore the soul of the country -- decency, honor, integrity; talk about the things that matter to people, treat people with dignity.  Secondly, I said, to rebuild the backbone of the country, the middle class, and this time bring everybody along and have a chance.  And the third reason was unite the country.  On my own primary, I got la- -- "Unite the country?  What are you talking about?" 
 
You cannot function in our system without consensus, other than abusing power at the executive level. 
 
So I really think there's so many things that we agree on that we don't focus enough on.  And that's, in large part, I think, because we don't just condemn the things that are so obviously wrong -- obviously wrong -- that everybody agrees on.  The way they were raised.  The way we were raised.  As my mother would say, if half the things that occurred in the last campaign came out of my mouth, as she'd say as a kid, we'd wash my mouth out with soap.  (Laughter.)
 
I mean, we have to be more decent and treat people with respect, and just decency.
 
MR. COOPER:  But let me --
 
THE PRESIDENT:  And -- 
 
MR. COOPER:  Let me ask about -- a question which does often divide many people in this country: immigration. 
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Yes.
 
MR. COOPER:  Your administration, along with congressional Democrats, expected to unveil an immigration reform bill just this week.  You want a pathway to citizenship for the roughly 11 million undocumented immigrants.  Would you sign any immigration bill if it did not include that: a pathway for the roughly 11 million undocumented --
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Yeah, there's a whole range of things that relate to immigration, including the whole idea how you deal with -- you know, what confuses people, is you talk about refugees, you talk about undocumented, you talk about people who are seeking asylum, and you talk about people who are coming from the -- that are coming from camps or being held around the world. 
 
And there are four different criteria for being able to come to the United States.  The vast majority of the people, those 11 million undocumented, they're not Hispanics; they're people who came on a visa -- who was able to buy a ticket to get in a plane, and didn't go home.  They didn't come across the Rio Grande swimming -- excuse me.  (Laughter.)  And -- and -- sorry, that’s the Irish in me.  (Laughter.)  
 
But all kidding aside.  So there are a lot of things that relate -- but I think that we can no long- -- look, you’ve he- -- I'm -- even if you're not involved in politics at all, you've probably heard me say this a thousand times, and matter of -- that everyone is entitled to be treated with decency, with dignity.  Everyone is entitled to that. 
 
And we don't do that enough.  For the first time in American history, if you're seeking asylum -- meaning you're being persecuted, you're seeking asylum -- you can't do it from the United States.  You used to come, have an asylum officer determine whether or not you met the criteria, and send you back if you in fact -- but you can't even do that.  You’ve got to seek asylum from abroad.
 
MR. COOPER:  But just to be clear, though -- and I know you're going to be announcing stuff later this week, or that’s what I've heard -- you do want a pathway to citizenship --
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Yes. 
 
MR. COOPER:  -- for ele- -- roughly 11 million undocumented immigrants.
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Yes.
 
MR. COOPER:  And that would be essential in any bill for you? 
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Well, yes.  (Applause.)  But, by the way, if you came along and said to me, "In the meantime, we can work out a system whereby we're going to…"  For example, we used to allow refugees -- 125,000 refugees in the United States in a yearly basis.  It was as high as 250,000.  Trump cut it to 5,000. 
 
Come with me into Sierra Leone.  Come with me into parts of Lebanon.  Come with me around the world and see people piled up in camps, kids dying, no way out, refugees fleeing from persecution.  We, the United States, used to do our part.  We were part of that.  We were -- and, you know, that’s -- you know, “send me your huddled masses.”  Come on.
 
And so I would, if you had a refugee bill by itself -- I'm not suggesting that -- but I would -- there's things that I would deal by itself, but not at the expense of saying, “I'm never going to do the other.”  There is a reasonable path to citizenship. 
 
And it shows up -- one of the reasons why we have been able to compete with the rest of the world so well is most of our major competitors are xenophobic.  You remember quite -- I remember you questioned me when I came back from China.  And I said, “I predict, within less than a year, they're going to end their One China policy.”  And I got clobbered by -- saying -- because they said Biden didn't talk about the fact that -- how immoral it was.  And it was when we were running against a Republican ticket, led by Mitt Romney -- a fine guy.
 
MR. COOPER:  You just talked to China’s President, I believe.
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Yes, for two hours.
 
MR. COOPER:  What about the Uyghurs?  What about the human rights abuses in China?
 
THE PRESIDENT:  We must speak up for human rights.  It's who we are.  We can't -- my comment to him was -- and I know him well, and he knows me well.  We're -- a two-hour conversation.
 
MR. COOPER:  You talked about this to him?
 
THE PRESIDENT:  I talked about this, too.  And that's not so much refugee, but I talked about -- I said -- look, you know, Chinese leaders -- if you know anything about Chinese history, it has always been -- the time when China has been victimized by the outer world is when they haven't been unified at home.  So the central -- to vastly overstate it -- the central principle of Xi Jinping is that there must be a united, tightly controlled China.  And he uses his rationale for the things he does based on that.
 
I point out to him: No American President can be sustained as a President if he doesn't reflect the values of the United States.  And so the idea I'm not going to speak out against what he's doing in Hong Kong, what he's doing with the Uyghurs in western mountains of China and Taiwan, trying to end the One China policy by making it forceful -- I said -- and by the -- he said he -- he gets it.  Culturally, there are different norms that each country and they -- their leaders -- are expected to follow. 
 
But my point was that when I came back from meeting with him and traveling 17,000 miles with him when I was vice president and he was the vice president -- that's how I got to know him so well, at the request of President Hu -- not a joke -- his predecessor, President Hu -- and President Obama wanted us to get to know one another because he was going to be the president.
 
And I came back and said they're going to end their One China -- their one child policy, because they're so xenophobic, they won't let anybody else in, and more people are retired than working.  How can they sustain economic growth when more people are retired?
 
MR. COOPER:  When you talk to him, though, about human rights abuses, is that just -- is that as far as it goes in terms of the U.S.?  Or is there any actual repercussions for China?
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Well, there will be repercussions for China, and he knows that.  What I'm doing is making clear that we, in fact, are going to continue to reassert our role as spokespersons for human rights at the U.N. and other -- other agencies that have an impact on their attitude.
 
China is trying very hard to become the world leader and to get that moniker.  And to be able to do that, they have to gain the confidence of other countries.  And as long as they're engaged in activity that is contrary to basic human rights, it's going to be hard for them to do that.
 
But it's much more complicated than that.  I’m -- I shouldn't have tried to talk China policy in 10 minutes on television here.
 
MR. COOPER:  Well, let me -- let me bring it back to the United States.  I want you to meet Joycelyn Fish, a Democrat from Racine.  Joycelyn is the director of marketing for a community theater. 
 
Joycelyn, welcome.  Your question?
 
AUDIENCE MEMBER:  Hello.  Good evening, Mr. President.
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Good evening.
 
AUDIENCE MEMBER:  Student loans are crushing my family, friends, and fellow Americans.
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Me too.
 
AUDIENCE MEMBER:  (Laughs.)  The American Dream --
 
THE PRESIDENT:  You think I’m kidding.
 
AUDIENCE MEMBER:  -- is to succeed.  But how can we fulfill that dream when debt is many people's only option for a degree?  We need student loan forgiveness beyond the potential $10,000 your administration has proposed.  We need at least a $50,000 minimum.  What will you do to make that happen?
 
THE PRESIDENT:  I will not make that happen.  It depends on whether or not you go to a private university or public university.  It depends on the idea that I say to a community, “I'm going to forgive the debt…” -- the billions of dollars in debt for people who have gone to Harvard and Yale and Penn and schools my children -- I went to a great school.  I went to a state school.  But is that going to be forgiven, rather than use that money to provide for early education for young children who are -- come from disadvantaged circumstances?
 
But here's what I think: I think everyone -- and I've been proposing this for four years -- everyone should be able to go to community college for free.  For free.  (Applause.)  That's -- that costs $9 billion, and we should pay for it.  And the tax policies we have now -- we should be able to pay for you.  We spend almost that money as a break for people who own race horses.
 
And I think any family making under $125,000 whose kids go to a state university they get into, that should be free as well. 
 
And the thing I do in terms of student debt that's accumulated is provide for changing the existing system now for debt forgiveness if you engage in volunteer activity.  For example, if you were -- if you're teaching school, after five years, you -- you would have $50,000 of your debt forgiven.  If you worked in a battered women's shelter, if you worked -- and so on.  So you'll be able to forgive debt.
 
Thirdly, I'm going to change the position that we have now to allow for debt forgiveness -- because it’s so hard to calculate -- whereby you can now, depending on how much you make and what program you sought, you can work off that debt by the activity you have, and you cannot be charged more than X percent of your take-home pay so that it doesn't affect your ability to buy a car, own a home, et cetera.
 
Each of my children graduated from school.  I mortgaged the house.  I was listed as the poorest man in Congress for -- not a joke -- for over 30 years.  And -- but I was able to bo- -- I bought a home I spent a lot of time working on, and I was able to sell it for some profit.
 
But my -- my oldest son graduated, after undergraduate and graduate school, with $136,000 in debt after working 40 -- I mean, excuse me, 30 hours a week during school.  My other son, who went to Georgetown and Yale Law School, graduated $142,000 in debt, and he worked for a parking service in -- down in Washington.  My daughter went to Tulane University and then got a masters at Penn.  She graduated $103,000 in debt.
 
So I don't think anybody should have to pay for that, but I do think you should be able to work it off.  My daughter is a social worker.  My other son became a -- ran the World Food Program USA, and so on.  They -- they didn't qualify.
 
But my point is: I understand the impact of the debt, and it can be debilitating.  And I think there is a whole question about what universities are doing.  They don't need more skyboxes.  What they need is more money invested in -- in making -- so that’s why I provide, for example, $80 billion -- $70 billion over 10 years for HBCUs and other minority-serving universities, because they don't have the laboratories to be able to bring in those government contracts that can train people in cybersecurity or other future endeavors that pay well.
 
But I do think that, in this moment of economic pain and strain, that we should be eliminating interest on the debts that are accumulated, number one.  And number two, I'm prepared to write off a $10,000 debt, but not 50.
 
MR. COOPER:  Mr. President, let me ask you --
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Because I don't think I have the authority to do it by signing the pen.
 
MR. COOPER:  You have, over the years -- over your career, you've obviously spent a great deal of time at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, except now you're living there and you're President.  It's been four weeks.  What's it like?  How's it different?
 
THE PRESIDENT:  I get up in the morning, look at Jill, and say, “Where the hell are we?”  (Laughter.)
 
No, it’s -- look, it's -- you know, I've only been President four weeks.  And sometimes -- because things are moving so fast, not because of burden -- it feels like four years.  It's not because of the burden; it’s because there's so much happening that you focus on.  You're constantly focusing on one problem or opportunity, one right -- ad seriatum.
 
But what happens is that it's -- what I didn't realize: I had been in the Oval Office a hundred times, as Vice President -- or more than that, every morning, for the initial meetings -- but I had never been up in the Residence.  And one of the things that -- I don’t know about you all, but I was raised in the way that you didn’t look for anybody to wait on you.  And it’s -- we’re -- I find myself extremely self-conscious.  There are wonderful people who work at the White House.  But someone, you know, standing there and, you know, making sure -- hands me my suitcoat or --
 
MR. COOPER:  You’d never been in the Residence of the White House?
 
THE PRESIDENT:  I’d only been upstairs in the -- in the Yellow Room.  You know, the -- the Oval upstairs.
 
MR. COOPER:  I don't know, I've never been there either.  (Laughter.)
 
THE PRESIDENT:  No.  And -- but it’s -- but, look, the people down there are wonderful.  And I find that, you know -- like, my dad -- you've heard me say this before -- my dad used to say, “Everybody…” -- “Everybody is entitled to be treated with respect.”  And it's interesting how decent and incredible these folks are.
 
MR. COOPER:  Is it different than you expected it to be, in some ways?
 
THE PRESIDENT:  You know, I don't know what I ever expected it to be.  I -- it is different in that -- I’ll get in trouble in here.  I said when I was running, I wanted to be President not to live in the White House but to be able to make the decisions about the future of the country.  And so living in the White House, as you've heard other presidents who have been extremely flattered to live there, has -- it's a little like a gilded cage in terms of being able to walk outside and do things.
 
The Vice President's residence was totally different.  You're on 80 acres, overlooking the rest of the city.  And you can walk out, and there's a swimming pool.  You can walk off a porch in the summer and jump in a pool, and -- and, you know, go into work.  You can ride a bicycle around and never leave the property and work out.  And you can -- but the White House is very different. 
 
And I feel a sense of -- I must tell you, a sense of history about it.  Jon Meacham, who you know, and several other presidential historians, helped me with my -- I asked my brother, who's good at this, to set up the Oval Office for me, because it all happens within two hours, you know?  Literally.  They move everything out and move something. 
 
And it was interesting to hear these historians talk about what -- what other presidents have gone through in the moments, and who were the people who stepped up to the ball, and who's the people who didn't.  And what you realize is the most consequential thing for me is -- although I've known this watching seven presidents who I got to know fairly well -- is I always, in the past, looked at the presidency in the terms of Abraham Lincoln and Franklin Roosevelt and George Washington and how can -- (inaudible).  They're super human. 
 
But I had to remind myself, they’re really fine men that I knew well -- the last seven presidents -- and at least there are people who I knew well enough to know that I play on the same team with. 
 
So it took away the sense of, “This is -- my God, you know, I'm not Abraham Lincoln.  I'm not Franklin Roosevelt.  How do I deal with these problems?” 
 
MR. COOPER:  Have you picked up the phone and called any former president yet? 
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Yes, I have. 
 
MR. COOPER:  Do you want to say who?
 
THE PRESIDENT:  No, I don't.  They're private conversations.  (Laughter.)  But -- and, by the way, all of them have, with one exception, picked up the phone and called me as well.  (Laughter.)
 
MR. COOPER:  I know you don't want to talk about him, but -- (laughter).
 
THE PRESIDENT:  No, but, look, it's a -- it’s the greatest honor I think an American can be given, from my perspective.  And I literally pray that I have the capacity to do for the country what you all deserve need be done. 
 
But one thing I learned after eight years with Barack is, no matter how consequential the decision -- I got to be the last person in the room with him, literally, on every decision -- I can make a recommendation, but I walked out of the room, and it was all him, man.  Nobody else.  The buck stops there. 
 
And that's where you pray for making sure that you're looking at the impact on the country and a little bit of good luck at the judgment you're making. 
 
MR. COOPER:  Mr. President, thank you so much for joining us --
 
THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you.
 
MR. COOPER:  -- in this town hall.  (Applause.) 
 
                         END                 9:13 P.M. CST

February 16, 2021 Readout of President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. Call with Governors of States Impacted by Severe Winter Weather

 

The White House Logo
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
February 16, 2021
 
 
Readout of President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. Call with Governors of States Impacted by Severe Winter Weather
 
President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. spoke this evening with governors of states impacted by severe winter weather, including Texas Governor Greg Abbott, Louisiana Governor John Bel Edwards, Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear, Kansas Governor Laura Kelly, Tennessee Governor Bill Lee, Mississippi Governor Tate Reeves, and Oklahoma Governor Kevin Stitt. The President and the governors discussed the extreme winter weather situation across the central and southern regions of the country that is impacting tens of millions of Americans and leaving millions of homes without power.
 
President Biden relayed to the governors that he understood the severity of the conditions being felt across the states, and that he and the First Lady were praying for swift recovery from the effects of the storm. President Biden reiterated to all the governors that his Administration is prepared to assist and stands ready to respond to requests for Federal assistance from the governors and will deploy any additional Federal emergency resources available to assist the residents of their states in getting through this historic storm.

President Biden also expressed gratitude for all of the workers on the front lines responding to the storm, especially our road workers, highway patrol officers, and first responders who are taking swift action in horrific conditions to save lives.

 

February 16, 2021 Press Briefing by Press Secretary Jen Psaki, February 16, 2021

 

The White House Logo
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
February 16, 2021
 
Press Briefing by Press Secretary Jen Psaki, February 16, 2021

James S. Brady Press Briefing Room
12:17 P.M. EST
 
MS. PSAKI:  Happy Tuesday.  All right.  I have a couple of items for all of you at the top.  A lot of you have asked -- maybe not in this room, but in general: What's next?  What are we focused on next?  And the answer is the President is going to continue working on getting the American Rescue Plan passed.  That is his top priority.  He is traveling to Wisconsin later this evening, as you know, to have a conversation, engage with the American people about his plans to get the pandemic under control, to put people back to work.  And Congress is continuing to do their job.  Over the course of the coming weeks, we're looking forward to making progress. 
 
There was also news out this morning about a foreclosure moratorium extension.  Some of you may have seen.  The COVID crisis has triggered a housing affordability crisis, with more than 10 million homeowners behind on mortgage payments and communities of color at even greater risk of eviction and foreclosure. 
 
Today, the administration is taking another step to bring urgent action -- relief to the American fam- -- American families struggling to keep a roof over their heads.  So, something the President talked about on day one, we talked about on day one.  But today, the Departments of Housing and Urban Development, Veterans Affairs, and Agriculture announced they will extend and expand the foreclosure relief programs, building on the steps President Biden spoke about a couple of weeks ago.
 
These critical protections were due to expire in March.  But as part of today's announcement, the foreclosure moratorium and the mortgage forbearance enrollment window will be extended through June 30th.  The administration will also provide up to six months of additional mortgage payments to -- forbearance for borrowers who entered forbearance on or before June 30th, 2020.
 
These actions will bring needed relief to most of the 2.7 million homeowners currently in forbearance and extend forbearance options for nearly 11 million homeowners with government-backed mortgages across the country.  It's critical -- it remains critical that Congress pass the American Rescue Plan to deliver more aid to struggling homeowners. 
 
As we speak, or maybe a little earlier, depending on when the call wrapped, Jeff Zients had a regular call with a number of governors -- our COVID Response Coordinator, of course -- providing them with key updates on our pandemic response, as well as hearing from them about the work they're doing on the ground. 
 
As a part of that call, he announced that we're increasing the vaccine supply to 13.5 million doses per week that will go out to states.  This is a 57 percent increase from the amount states received when the President was inaugurated.  So since then, obviously, we have announced a couple of increases over the course of time. 
 
We're also announcing that we're doubling the supply to our pharmacy program.  When we announced that, we said it would be -- it would be building over time.  So this -- today's announcement amounts to 2 million doses going to local pharmacies this week, and this program will expand access in neighborhoods across the country so that people can call and make an appointment and get their shot conveniently and quickly. 
 
Eventually, as supply increases, more than 40,000 pharmacy locations nationwide will be providing COVID-19 vaccines through this program.  This is a critical, critical part of our plan. 
 
Last -- or, sorry, second to last item.  Last but certainly -- or second to last, but certainly not least, we opened Healthcare.gov as planned and as we had announced for special enrollment period until May 15th to provide all Americans the opportunity to sign up for health insurance.  They can go to Healthcare.gov.  Nearly 9 million Americans are eligible for free or subsidized health insurance. 
 
Finally, as you know, a brutal Arctic mass impacted the central United States this weekend, bringing freezing rain, sleet, and snow from Texas to the Mid-Atlantic.  On Saturday night, Texas Governor Greg Abbott requested a federal emergency declaration due to the severe weather storm.  Homeland Security Advisor Dr. Liz Sherwood-Randall called Governor Abbott on Sunday to let him know that the President had immediately granted his request to help meet the state's mass care and shelter needs. 
 
Yesterday, Liz additionally called the other governors in the storm's path on behalf of the President, including Governor Ivey of Alabama, Governor John Bel Edwards of Louisiana, Governor Laura Kelly of Kansas, Governor Reeves of Mississippi, and Governor Kevin Stitt of Oklahoma.  She expressed the President's strong commitment to ensuring that the federal government proactively does everything it can to support state and local officials in preparing for and responding to the events that impact our citizens.  We will, of course, continue to monitor the storm’s updates in the days ahead. 
 
With that, Zeke, go ahead. 
 
Q    First, Jen, the President’s schedule didn’t have a whole lot of official events before he leaves this afternoon.  Can you give us a sense of what he's been doing today? 
 
And then, does he plan to reach out to those specific governors from those affected states -- Governor Abbott and others -- who have been affected by the storm?
 
MS. PSAKI:  I expect -- so let me take the second, first.  The President has been kept abreast, as I noted, of the events and been provided updates -- regular updates on the storm and the progress and, of course, the emergency declaration.  I don't have any calls to read out, but I expect he will be involved personally.  And if we have calls that he's making himself, we will provide that information to all of you. 
 
In terms of what he's spending his day doing, he's continuing to have meetings with his policy teams and experts about his plans to bring relief to the American people and public.  And, you know, he's remained -- he's remained focused on that today behind the scenes before he travels to Wisconsin for a town hall later this evening. 
 
Q    And then, just on this vaccine announcement: Is there any discussion of this winter weather affecting the vaccine distribution?  And what steps is the federal government taking to ensure that there’s no spoilage of those vaccines, which have to be kept in those very cold temperatures during shipping, and (inaudible) delays?
 
MS. PSAKI:  You're right that we monitor, obviously, weather.  Mother Nature and the weather can sometimes impact and requires contingency planning, which is something our team is quite focused on.  Our COVID-19 response team is also in close touch with state and local governments across the country.  We're monitoring the situation in Texas very closely.  Obviously, FEMA is running point on a number of the operational pieces.  But while I don't have an update now, it's something we're very mindful of, and we contingency-plan to ensure people are getting the doses they need at an appropriate timeline.
 
Q    And just one quick one on a different topic.  Congressman Bennie Thompson filed a civil suit against former President Trump -- part of what we expect to be sort of a slew of civil suits against the former President and others involved in the January 6th insurrection.  Does President Biden have any response to that?  And does he support efforts like that to use the civil courts to hold President Trump accountable?
 
MS. PSAKI:  You know, he certainly supports the rights of individuals -- members of Congress and otherwise -- to take steps through the judicial process, but I don't think we have a further comment on it than that. 
 
Go ahead.  Oh sorry, Trevor, let me go to you.  I promised.  Go ahead. 
 
I’ll come to you next, Mary.
 
Q    So, just on -- two on foreign policy for you.  First, there was a rocket attack in Iraq yesterday, and Iraqi officials have said that the group that took responsibility for that attack has ties to Iran.  My question is: One, whether you've made that determination as well.  And, two, what kind of retaliation would be considered (inaudible)?
 
MS. PSAKI:  Sure.  Appreciate the question.  We're still working through attribution with our Iraqi partners to determine precise attribution for this attack.  Obviously, that's a priority. 
 
I will convey that we are outraged by last night's rocket attack in the Iraqi Kurdistan Region.  Initial reports indicate that the attacks killed one civilian contractor and injured several members of the coalition, including one American service member and several American contractors.  And we offer our condolences to the loved ones of the civilian contractor killed.  The Iraqi people have certainly suffered for far too long from this kind of violence and violation of their sovereignty.
 
I will also note -- and I think the State Department provided this update, but just for all of you -- Secretary Blinken has reached out to the Kurdistan Regional Government Prime Minister Barzani.  And Secretary Austin is speaking with his counterpart to offer assistance with the investigation and to help hold accountable those responsible for this attack.  But we have not determined attribution at this point. 
 
Q    And do you expect that there would be retaliation if -- once that declaration is made?
 
MS. PSAKI:  Well, as always, the President of the United States and the administration reserves the right to respond in the time and the manner of our choosing, but we'll wait for the attribution to be concluded first before we take any additional steps or obviously have any additional announcements. 
 
I will convey to you that obviously diplomacy is a priority with this administration and something that is front and center to our engagement with our global partners around the world.  And certainly, these calls are evidence of that, but that will always be a part of our strategy as well. 
 
Q    And to the point of diplomacy, one thing that Germany has asked for is some relief, as far as the Nord Stream 2 pipeline.  And I'm just curious if you have an update on that, whether Biden will consider waiving the ability to do sanctions on (inaudible).
 
MS. PSAKI:  Well, our position on Nord Stream 2 has been very clear, and it remains unchanged.  President Biden has made clear that Nord Stream 2 is a bad deal.  It’s a bad deal because it divides Europe, it exposes Ukraine and Central Europe to Russia -- Russian manipulation, and because it goes against Europe's own stated energy and security goals. 
 
We're continuing to monitor activity to complete or to certify the pipeline.  And if such activity takes place, we'll make a determination of the applicability of sanctions.  Importantly, sanctions are only one among many important tools to ensure energy security.  And we’ll -- of course, we'll do this all in partnership with our allies and partners, but our position has not changed on the -- on the deal. 
 
Go ahead. 
 
Q    The President is changing gears this week, obviously, looking beyond the Hill to get out and sell this plan to the American people.  Is this a sign that he recognizes that he's not likely to get Republicans in Washington on board?
 
MS. PSAKI:  He certainly wouldn't agree with that.  I would say that the President's view of the package -- well, one -- I would say first -- the President has not “shifting gears,” he has been focused every single day -- even as others have not, which is understandable -- on engaging with partners, stakeholders, people who agree with him, people who don't agree with him on getting this package through. 
 
This is an opportunity, as you noted, to go out and have a conversation with the people of Wisconsin -- people who agree with him, people who disagree with them.  But if you look at the polls, they are very consistent.  The vast majority of the American people like what they see in this package.  And that should be an indication, or should be noted by member of Congress -- members of Congress as they consider whether they're going to vote for it or not. 
 
Q    So is he hoping then that these visits will help build pressure on members of Congress?
 
MS. PSAKI:  No, his objective is really to make sure he is engaging directly with the people who are impacted by the pandemic, who are impacted by the economic downturn, who are worried about whether they're going to get a shot, who are -- don't know where -- where to get information, who are worried about whether they're going to be able to put food on the table.   That's the focus of this trip. 
 
Obviously, Republicans in Congress will have to make their own choice about whether they support the final package.  It's still working its way through Congress.  But the vast majority of the public supports it, including the vast majority of most members’ constituents.  So it's really a question for them. 
 
Q    And on another topic, would the President sign legislation to create a commission to investigate the January 6th attack?
 
MS. PSAKI:  Well, I saw an announcement -- I believe it was yesterday, if I'm remembering correctly -- by Speaker Pelosi -- or some comments, I should say.  It's, of course, Congress's decision to form this commission, as we've talked about a bit in here, but it's certainly one the President would support.
 
And President Biden has made clear his views on the tragic events of January 6th, including where responsibility for them lies.  He backs efforts to shed additional light on the facts to ensure something like that never happens again. 
 
In addition to the recently announced desire to put together a commission or form a commission, we’ll continue to work with Congress to identify measures that the federal government can take going forward to prevent violence we saw on January 6th.  And as you know, probably, Mary, there's a number of hearings that are upcoming in the coming weeks, and we'll be cooperative with those, of course.
 
Q    What would he hope to learn through a commission?  Because obviously, we saw a very thorough airing of the events last week. 
 
MS. PSAKI:  Again, I don't think the tenets of the commission have been formed.  That's up to Congress to do.  We have a role to play in the federal government, of course, with ongoing investigations out of the Department of Justice, but he supports efforts to move forward with it -- the desire to have one, certainly, understanding and knowing how much the events on the 6th impacted members sitting on the Hill. 
 
Go ahead.
 
Q    Jen, thank you.  The President and yourself have frequently cited what you describe as the “failures” or the “shortcomings” of the Trump administration, as it relates to their response to COVID.  We're now nearly a month into this administration.  Does the Biden administration now own the coronavirus response?
 
MS. PSAKI:  Well, certainly, the President of the United States owns the response to the COVID pandemic.  That's why he has focused on it every single day.  However, it's important for the American people to know what we inherited when the President came into office.  And what he inherited was not enough supply, not enough vaccinators, not enough places for vaccinations to happen.  Communities had been left to fend for themselves.  And so, that's what he's been focused on and working on. 
 
But certainly, if he were standing here, he would say that's why it's the issue he wakes up every morning and is focused on, because addressing it is what's on the minds of the American people.  And he's the President; it's his responsibility to focus on it.
 
Q    Let me ask, if I can -- I want to bounce around a little bit back to the impeachment trial that just wrapped up.  You guys posted a statement late on Saturday where he said the final vote, though it “did not lead to a conviction, the substance of the charge,” the President said, “is not in dispute.  Even those opposed to the conviction” -- he cited Mitch McConnell -- “believe [that] Donald Trump was guilty of a ‘disgraceful dereliction of duty’ and ‘practically and morally responsible for provoking’ the violence unleashed on the Capitol.” 
 
So, if he wasn't convicted through an impeachment trial via Congress, via the Senate, how should a President who commits acts that President Biden says are not in dispute be punished?
 
MS. PSAKI:  Well, I think, obviously, there was a process that worked its way through the Senate.  That's why we put out a statement on Saturday evening.
 
Q    Does he support criminal prosecution?
 
MS. PSAKI:  That -- that will be up to the Department of Justice to determine.  We're doing something new here, and there's going to be an independent Justice Department to determine what any path forward in any investigation would look like.
 
Q    Absent this President's actions though, do you think -- does something like this -- does it seem -- I mean, Mitch McConnell left that door open to criminal prosecution.  Would actions like this -- do they meet the bar for criminal prosecution?
 
MS. PSAKI:  I am not going to speculate on criminal prosecution from the White House podium.  We -- the President is committed to having an independent Justice Department that will make their own decisions about the path forward.
 
Q    Let me ask you a last question, if I can.  It’s housekeeping around here.  TJ Ducklo, as we know, is no longer working for this White House.  He was suspended for a week after comments that he made to a female journalist.  The President, as you know, on Inauguration Day said, “If you're ever working with me and I hear you treat another…with disrespect, talk down to someone, I promise you I will fire you on the spot…No ifs, ands, or buts.”  He didn’t fire TJ on the spot.  He has since resigned.  Has the President's position on talking down or disrespecting others changed?
 
MS. PSAKI:  I think the President leads by example, and I try to do the same.  And on Saturday, when we announced that TJ Ducklo had resigned his position -- something we all agreed was the right path forward -- I made clear that every day we're going to try to meet the standard set out by the President in treating others with dignity and respect, with civility, and with a value for others through our words and our actions.  He's no longer employed here, and I think that speaks for itself. 
 
Go ahead.
 
Q    Jen, thank you.  As you prepare to put out an immigration plan as soon as the end of this week, can you give us a little more information on the timing?  And also, when it comes to the DREAMers, can you give us any specifics on whether a potential pathway to citizenship will be part of the plan for that particular group?
 
MS. PSAKI:  Well, there certainly is -- part of the proposal that the President outlined and proposed on day one is an earned path to citizenship -- right? -- for 11 million immigrants who are undocumented immigrants, who are living in the country. 
 
He's also somebody who believes in the rights of the DACA recipients to be in the country.  He was here during the, of course, Obama-Biden administration, of which he played a prominent role -- an important role -- and supported that program.
 
We've outlined the tenets of what we think the proposal should look like, which includes that, but also includes funding to address the root causes, includes investment in smart security.  But Congress will have to work through what it looks like moving forward and what components will be included in here or what components could be dealt with separately.
 
Q    And how important will it be to this administration that this be one overarching, large, comprehensive package versus pieces of an immigration plan that are broken up and passed separately?
 
MS. PSAKI:  Well, I understand and I've read -- I know there's different points of view and different views from prominent and important advocates on this particular issue.  But we're going to let the bill be presented formally at some point soon; I'm not going to get ahead of that process. 
 
And certainly the President feels that all of these requirements that are in the bill -- these components of the bill -- are what makes it comprehensive.  They all need to be addressed; that's why he proposed them together. 
 
Q    And does the President plan to rescind these Trump-era restrictions on immigration and work visas that have dramatically limited immigration?  They're set to expire at the end of March.  Will he let those expire naturally or will he rescind them before that?
 
MS. PSAKI:  Let me talk to our Department of Homeland Security.  It’s likely a conversation that would happen in coordination with them.  Obviously, the President -- his view is that the approach of the prior administration was immoral but also ineffective in terms of addressing the challenge -- the many challenges of an outdated immigration system.  But I don't have an update on those particular requirements.
 
Q    And then just one question on Afghanistan.  Has the administration decided whether to further troop withdrawals below 4,500?  And if the decision hasn't been made yet, when do you expect one?
 
MS. PSAKI:  I don't have any update on that front or a timeline of when any additional decisions will be made.
 
Q    Do you feel that the previous administration withdrawing troops so quickly tied this administration's hands?
 
MS. PSAKI:  You know, I think the President is somebody who is not new to the global stage, and certainly not new to the difficult decisions that me- -- need to be made around issues related to Afghanistan, issues related to the men and women who are serving, and our own national security.  So he's making decisions through that prism, but I just don't have an update on what any timeline will look like. 
 
Go ahead.
 
Q    Thanks, Jen.  First, on the vaccine: You were talking earlier about how the President wants to address the concerns of everyday Americans with vaccine and the pandemic.  One way the White House Chief of Staff proposed doing that last month was creating a national clearinghouse for vaccine information that would either be available online or through a hotline. 
 
MS. PSAKI:  Mm-hmm.
 
Q    Can you update us on the -- on the progress of that?  Is that close to being rolled out? 
 
MS. PSAKI:  I don’t have any update for you, other than to convey that our team is always considering a range of options to make information more accessible, ensure more people -- more of the American public know how they can get a vaccine, when they can get a vaccine, where they can go to get a vaccine.  That's part of the reason the President is, of course, traveling to Wisconsin.  But I don't have any update for you on a clearinghouse or a website.
 
Q    So it sounds like that's only still under consideration.  Is that something that's really not in the works at the moment?
 
MS. PSAKI:  There are a range of options under consideration, and their focus is on taking the steps that are the most effective and efficient, and prioritizing those in the order through which they would help the American people.
 
Q    Now, on the situation in Texas, beyond disaster relief, is the administration considering any actions to address not only Texas’s power grid, but the power grid in the central United States that seemed to really struggle with the winter weather, in addition to some other issues?  I know Texas is not really part of the national power grid.  Is the administration looking at that situation and considering any kind of actions in the short term to address it?
 
MS. PSAKI:  Well, I think our focus right now is ensuring that the millions of people across Texas who were impacted by the storm get the relief they need.  Obviously, that's why the President and his homeland security advisor took very quick action over the weekend. 
 
Clearly, as there are investments in the future in energy se- -- in energy -- forms of energy, I should say, across the country, they'll need to plan for inclement weather.  But I think that's a discussion and conversation that’s a little bit down the road.
 
Q    Well, due to the fact that the Texas grid is not part of the national system, was that alarming to anyone in the administration?  I mean, would you prefer that there be a national grid that's all integrated?
 
MS. PSAKI:  I would send you to the Department of Energy and others to answer that question.
 
Go ahead.
 
Q    Thanks, Jen.  Back on tonight’s trip: Is there any particular reason Wisconsin was chosen as the site of tonight's town hall?
 
MS. PSAKI:  You don't like Wisconsin?  (Laughs.)
 
Q    No, I'm just wondering --
 
MS. PSAKI:  It's a little cold.  I looked it up this morning.  But --
 
Q    I've been there; it's lovely.  But is there any particular reason why?  Is it Ron Johnson, in terms of pressure on him, or engage Democrats in a state the President just won?  Why Wisconsin?
 
MS. PSAKI:  Well, Wisconsin is a state where clearly there are Democrats, Republicans, independents, as we saw from the final outcome of the vote in November -- people who have different points of view on a range of issues.  And it was a state that -- where people have been impacted by the pandemic; they've been impacted by the economic downturn. 
 
And the President felt that he could have a good conversation with people about the path forward and also even people who disagree with him.  So it was not more complicated than that.
 
Q    Let me ask you about the President's ambitions in terms of getting Congress to pass gun control measures.  In a statement you issued over the weekend, the President said the time for action is now.  You're asking Congress to do a lot of things now.  What is your timetable for action on what the President calls “commonsense” measures?  And what's the realistic hope that you have that they'll pass both houses?
 
MS. PSAKI:  Well, we haven't proposed a package at this point, so it's hard for me to make a prediction about its likelihood of passing.  But I will say that the President is somebody, throughout his career, who has advocated for smart gun -- smart gun safety measures.  He has -- not afraid of standing up to the NRA -- he’s done it multiple times and won -- on background checks and a range of issues.  And it is a priority to him on a personal level. 
 
But I don't have a prediction for you or a preview for you on a timeline of a package, and certainly not what it will look like and how it would go through Congress.
 
Q    One more question for you.  The colleague who sat in this chair last week asked you a question about whether you -- this administration sees Saudi Arabia or Israel as allies of the United States.  Your answer was interpreted by some as something other than “yes.”  So I want to give you an opportunity to answer that question more directly now. 
 
MS. PSAKI:  Well, first let me say, on Israel, I know there's been some questions about when the President will speak with Prime Minister Netanyahu, which was, I think, the root of that question or how the question started.
 
So let me first confirm for you that his first call with a leader in the region will be with Prime Minister Netanyahu.  It will be soon.  I don't have an exact day for you, but it is soon.  Stay tuned.
 
Israel is, of course, an ally.  Israel is a country where we have an important strategic security relationship.  And our team is fully engaged -- not at the head-of-state, yet, level quite yet, but very soon.  But our team is fully engaged, having constant conversations at many levels with the Israelis.
 
And on Saudi Arabia, I would say: You know, we've made clear from the beginning that we're going to recalibrate our relationship with Saudi Arabia and that -- you know, President Biden -- one of the questions there was also -- just to go back to the context of it -- whether he would be speaking with MBS.  And part of that is going back to engagement, counterpart to counterpart.  The President's counterpart is King Salman, and I expect that, in appropriate time, he would have a conversation with him.  I don't have a prediction of the timeline on that. 
 
But I’ll also say that, you know, we have -- Saudi Arabia is in a position where they’re defending themselves from threats from the region.  You know, they are -- they have critical self-defense needs, and we will continue to work with them on those, even as we make clear areas where we have disagreements and where we have concerns.  And that's certainly a shift from the approach of the prior administration.
 
Okay, go ahead.
 
Q    I'm just following up on his question.  Does the President still plan to take executive action on gun violence?
 
MS. PSAKI:  The President has a range of actions at his disposal.  I think you were asking, Steve, about a legislative package, which I know.  But he hasn't ruled out either of those options, of course, but I don't have anything to announce for you in terms of what the next steps would look like.
 
Q    If I can just follow up on Texas.  Is there anything else the White House can do to administer immediate relief to the residents of Texas right now?
 
MS. PSAKI:  Well, I think we are -- our team -- our national security team, in part led by Dr. Liz Sherwood-Randall, who is our Homeland Security Advisor -- a position, I would note, that did not exist in the prior administration -- is in close contacts -- in close contact, I should say, monitoring developments of the storm.  The President is kept abreast of that as well, and we are engaged with them and what their needs are and what steps can be taken. 
 
Of course, declaring a federal disaster declaration ensures that you have access to, you know, national resources, and I think that was a step that was welcomed by the governor.
 
Go ahead.
 
Q    I have a quick circle-back question.  You said a few weeks ago that the White House would check to see if it was technically possible to release the visitor logs from the Trump administration.  Is there any answer on that?
 
MS. PSAKI:  I actually did answer that question, so --
 
Q    You did already?
 
MS. PSAKI:  Yes. 
 
Q    What was the answer?
 
MS. PSAKI:  The answer was: It exists in the National Archives, so they would have access, and you'd have to go to them for access to archives of their visitor logs from their period of time when the -- President Trump was there.
 
Q    Okay.  And then, just -- you said a gun package, TBD on timing; it's not in the works yet.  In terms of what's next after the relief package, is the plan to still do a big Build Back Better bill next or a more narrow infrastructure bill next?  Do we know what's coming next?
 
MS. PSAKI:  We're focused right now on getting the American Rescue Plan passed.  But the President is committed to engaging with a range of stakeholders.  Of course, he had the meeting last week with senators about infrastructure.  It's one of the areas where there's opportunity to work together. 
 
I think most people wouldn't argue that our roads, our bridges, our streets need to be rebuilt, but there are a lot of different needs and policy objectives the President has.  So we haven't yet determined what the next priority forward would be, but he is engaging with his policy team, as Zeke asked earlier -- what he did today, what he did over the weekend -- and a lot of that is having those discussions internally and with stakeholders about what it looks -- what's next.
 
Go ahead.
 
Q    Yeah, thanks, Jen.  A couple of quick questions.  Both Senators Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema have both expressed some opposition to increasing the minimum wage as it's laid out currently in the proposal, in the Senate.  And I wondered: Is President Biden open to, I guess, lengthening the period of time over which the minimum wage could be increased?  So, for example, you know, getting it to $15 by 2030.  Is he open to potentially extending the timeline there to get more people on board?
 
MS. PSAKI:  Well, we'll let the process play out through the Senate -- through the House first, then through the Senate, as they're negotiating what the final components will look like in a package. 
 
The President put an increase in the minimum wage in the initial package because he thinks it's important for American men and women, who are -- have a full-time job, working hard, to have a decent wage, and he thinks it's long past time to raise the minimum wage.  But we'll let the process see itself through, and I'm not going to negotiate what he'd be open to and not from the podium.
 
Q    And just a couple other quick ones.  One, I just wanted to clarify something.  Prime Minister Trudeau's office, after their call -- his call with President Biden in January -- he said that they had agreed to meet in February.  And I just want to see if you could clarify: Do they plan to meet in person, or was that just -- you know, the phrasing was off and they, kind of, (inaudible)?
 
MS. PSAKI:  You can meet over video, as we all know.  I don't have any timeline of a meeting to convey or to confirm for you, though I would anticipate for all of you that it will be a couple of months before the President has an in-person or an -- has an -- invites a foreign leader to meet in person here at the White House.
 
Q    And the last thing: Spring training for baseball starts this month, and I wondered --
 
MS. PSAKI:  So my husband tells me.
 
Q    -- has the White House or the Biden administration been in touch with Major League Baseball to, you know, give recommendations about safety protocols about whether it’s safe to have the season at this point?
 
MS. PSAKI:  I -- I’m happy to check with our COVID team and see if they've had any conversations.  Obviously, this is not the first season during the pandemic, but I will check and see if there's any role we have to play here.
 
Go ahead, in the back.
 
Q    Thank you, Jen.  With the President's -- President Trump's impeachment behind us, do you believe an impediment has been removed, in terms of passing the COVID relief act?  I mean, was that a distraction for anyone on the Hill or in the White House?
 
MS. PSAKI:  It certainly wasn't for us.  And members of Congress on the Hill continue to do their job in having conversations at the committee level.  It was an -- obviously, an important week in our nation's history.  The President put out -- we put out a statement from the President on Saturday.  And we understand why there was a focus on it from, of course, the media and also from many in the public.  But we have said from the beginning that the President would remain laser focused on getting the American Rescue Plan passed.  That's exactly what he did last week, and what he'll continue to do this week.  And we are pleased with the urgency we've seen from members of Congress as well. 
 
Go ahead.
 
Q    Jen, does the President still plan to address Congress this month as he has said he expects to?  And do you have any more information for us about the time?
 
MS. PSAKI:  We don't know where the February 23rd date came from.  It's a great mystery.  I've not Nancy Drew-ed that one out yet, but it was never planned to be in February and we don't have a date for a joint session at this point. 
 
Certainly, the President looks forward to addressing the public.  We remain in touch with leaders in Congress about a timeline and a format and what that would look like.  Obviously, it won't look like it is looked like in the past, that many of you have covered and I've attended, where you all sit on the floor of Congress and the President gives a speech, because of COVID.  But we're not behind any timeline because that date was never accurate. 
 
Q    And then one more on immigration.  There's a federal judge in Texas who could soon decide the fate of the DACA program for DREAMers.  If he moves to kill that program before Congress addresses the issue, what is the administration prepared to do to shield this population from deportation?
 
MS. PSAKI:  Well, the -- the DACA program is important to the President.  It is a program that he has long been committed to protecting and preserving and taking every step he can to do exactly that.  I'm not going to get ahead of a judge's ruling in Texas, but we will certainly watch closely.  And if there's more to say after that, we will -- we will share it. 
 
Go ahead.
 
Q    Jen, Mitch McConnell said -- on the Republican opposition to COVID relief, he said this is going to help unify their party.  He said, “I don't think many Republicans are going to be up for many things that are coming out of this administration.”  Do you remember what Mitch McConnell said in 2010 about the Biden adminis- -- about the Obama administration then?  He said, “The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term President.” 
 
So I guess my question is: What lessons were learned from then?  And given McConnell doesn't see any political incentive to work with Democrats, can you work with someone who isn't motivated to work with you?
 
MS. PSAKI:  Well, the President has known Senator McConnell for some time, and he is speaking -- spoken with him a number of times.  And he's certainly hopeful that they can find a way to work together in addressing the challenges facing the American people. 
 
But, I don't know if it's about lessons for us, as much as -- you know, the country is looking --
 
Q    You’re in the White House.
 
MS. PSAKI:  Well -- well, here's the thing though: The country is looking for action.  I mean, the country is looking for progress, for solutions on COVID, on the economy.  The package that the President has proposed has the support of almost three quarters of the public in most polls. 
 
So, I'm not sure what numbers Senator McConnell is looking at, but the American people have been clear what they're looking for.  And if they make a decision -- Republicans in Congress, Senator McConnell -- to vote against the will of their constituents, I would suggest you ask them why that's smart, politically, for them to do. 
 
Go ahead, in the back.
 
Q    Yeah, good afternoon.   Owen Jensen, EWTN Global Catholic Network. 
 
MS. PSAKI:  Mm-hmm. 
 
Q    So, regarding the American Rescue Plan, groups like -- pro-life groups, including the Susan B. Anthony List are very concerned that millions of U.S. taxpayer dollars will go to the abortion industry, in violation of the Hyde Amendment.  We know where President Biden stands on Hyde Amendment, but that being said, can this administration right now guarantee, if the American Rescue Plan is passed, that no taxpayer dollars will go to the abortion industry?
 
MS. PSAKI:  Which component of the American Rescue Plan are you referring to?
 
Q    I’ll pull it up right here.  “A $50 million funding increase for the Title X program.”  “$750 million for global health activities and billions in funding for community health centers without applying the Hyde Amendment.”
 
MS. PSAKI:  Well, the President's view on the Hyde Amendment is well known, as you have stated in your question.  He also believes that community health centers are a key part of addressing the pandemic, of ensuring that people in communities have access to vaccines, have access to treatment and information about -- about making sure they're healthy and their loved ones are healthy. 
 
So that remains a priority to the President.  He's shared his view on the Hyde Amendment.  I don't think I have anything new for you.
 
Q    Okay.  To follow up on it though, can he guarantee Americans who don't want their tax dollars -- pro-life Americans who don't want their tax dollars funding abortion, can he --
 
MS. PSAKI:  Well --
 
Q    Can the administration guarantee those tax dollars won’t be used for abortions?
 
MS. PSAKI:  Well, I think, Owen, as I've just noted, three quarters of the public supports the components of the package, wants to see the pandemic get under control, wants to see people put back to work, vaccines in arms.  So I think that answers your question. 
 
Q    (Inaudible.)
 
MS. PSAKI:  Okay, we're going to move on.  Go ahead, in the back.
 
Q    In a couple of -- in a couple of days, the President will address the Munich Security Conference.
 
MS. PSAKI:  Mm-hmm.
 
Q    And I think one point the Europeans would like to better understand is what he means with “foreign policy for the middle class.”  Does it mean to uphold Donald Trump's tariffs, like in the case of aluminum from the UAE?  Is the Biden administration using the same reasoning as the Trump administration?
 
MS. PSAKI:  I can assure you that the President -- this President does not have -- is not looking to the last presidency as the model for his foreign policy moving forward. 
 
President Biden has been working in the global arena for decades.  And what he means by “foreign policy for the middle class” is ensuring that our team working on economic issues, our team working on national security issues, our teams thinking about how policies impact the American people are talking and that we make decisions and make policies through that prism. 
 
We are certainly reviewing a range of tariffs that had been put in place by the past administration.  I don't have any updates on that for you.  But what the President is speaking to is the importance of contemplating integrating our domestic and national security teams, and the policymaking and the process that they go through, and his view that we are stronger globally if we take care of our house here at home.  So that is part of his objective as well. 
 
Go ahead.
 
Q    Thanks, Jen.  When President Biden and Governor Andrew Cuomo met last week, did they speak about the delayed release of data on the COVID-19 deaths in nursing homes in New York?
 
MS. PSAKI:  The focus of the meeting was on the President providing an update on his plans to help get the pandemic under control, to discuss with them the American Rescue Plan.  And in a large group meeting, have a discussion about what the challenges were that were facing governors and mayors.  You heard some of the mayors come out here.  So, no, that was not a focus of their conversation or a topic.
 
Q    And then, another quick question.  A lot of people, including Dr. Fauci, have said they felt side effects from the COVID vaccine.  Did the President or Vice President feel any side effects?
 
MS. PSAKI:  I don't think I have any updates on that for you.  They got their second vaccine several weeks ago, and they did that in public.  But I can check if there's more of an update from any side effects weeks ago.
 
Q    And as the print pooler,  I have a question from a colleague.  (Inaudible.)  Is that okay?
 
MS. PSAKI:  Sure, go ahead.
 
Q    Thanks.  This question is from Thomas Burr with News Nation: The President is flying to Michigan to tour the Pfizer plant and (inaudible) the COVID vaccine.  What is the administration doing now, almost a month into office, to increase vaccine availability?  And how many White House staffers have been vaccinated?
 
MS. PSAKI:  We provided an update a couple of -- maybe a week ago or so.  And we're -- our focus is on being as transparent as possible with our efforts to vaccinate senior staff and other staff around the White House complex.  We have a limited footprint as well here because every staffer is tested on a daily basis as well. 
 
I think we said the objective was to have hundreds vaccinated by the end of February.  I can double check if that's the latest update on that particular front.  What was your -- sorry, what was your other question?
 
Q    And then, what is the administration doing now to increase vaccine availability?
 
MS. PSAKI:  To the American public?
 
Q    Yes, now almost a month into the administration.
 
MS. PSAKI:  Well, we're taking a couple of steps.  One is, we're increasing supply.  Obviously, the President took the step of purchasing enough vaccines to ensure we have vaccines available to vaccinate every American by the end of July. 
 
He's also -- we've also increased by 57 percent the vaccine supply that's going out to states.  We've also taken steps to increase the number of vaccinators we have -- people who can actually put those shots in arms.  So that includes deploying members of the National Guard; taking steps including ensuring that retired nurses and doctors can be a part of the vaccination crew that is -- vaccinator crew, I should say, that is putting shots in arms.  So we've increased the number of vaccinators. 
 
And we've also increased the number of vaccination sites, partly by, you know, putting a plan in place to have several hundred community health centers where vaccinations can be distributed; working with states on mass vaccination centers; working with pharmacies, as we announced earlier -- as I announced earlier in the briefing, I should say, to get vaccines in the hands of pharmacies -- which 90 percent of the public lives within five miles of a pharmacy.
 
So there are a number of steps, but our focus has been on those three components: increasing supply -- vaccines; increasing vaccinators -- the people who can put those vaccines in arms; and increasing vaccination locations so people know where to go.
 
Go ahead. 
 
Q    Sorry, just wanted a quick follow-up on the President's appearance before a joint session of Congress.  In his primetime address last month, in January, reading from prepared remarks, he said: “Next month, in my first appearance for a joint session, I will lay out my Build Back Better plan.”
 
So it feels like he did say it was going to be in February.
 
MS. PSAKI:  Well, I -- what I was referring to is there was reporting on February 23rd, and I don't know where that date came from, which has never been inaccurate [sic].  So --
 
Q    So it was never going to be in February?  It was --
 
MS. PSAKI:  It was ne- -- the February 23rd wasn't -- just an inaccurate date -- no one's fault; it just was.  And it created some confusion, so I was just trying to clarify it.
 
Obviously, the President looks forward to speaking to a joint session.  We just don't have a date yet for when that will be, and obviously it will look different because of COVID and because we want to be safe and project the -- that safety and our responsibility of projecting that to the American public.
 
Q    So there's no specific reason it was potentially delayed from what the President himself thought last month?
 
MS. PSAKI:  There is not.  And he conveyed -- you know, he is looking forward to providing more details on a jobs package and, you know, next steps in his agenda.  And he still is looking forward to doing that, and we just don't have a date yet to announce for all of you.
 
Q    Thanks, Jen.
 
MS. PSAKI:  Thank you, everybody.  Have a good day.
 
                                   END                     12:59 P.M. EST

February 16, 2021 Statement by NSC Spokesperson Emily Horne on National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan’s Call with Geoffrey van Leeuwen, Foreign Affairs and Defense Advisor to the Prime Minister of the Netherlands

 

The White House Logo
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
February 16, 2021
 
Statement by NSC Spokesperson Emily Horne on National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan’s Call with Geoffrey van Leeuwen, Foreign Affairs and Defense Advisor to the Prime Minister of the Netherlands
 
National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan spoke by phone today with Geoffrey van Leeuwen, Foreign Affairs and Defense Advisor to the Prime Minister of the Netherlands.  Mr. Sullivan underscored the Biden Administration’s commitment to further strengthening the U.S.-Netherlands relationship and reinvigorating transatlantic ties.  He expressed appreciation for long-standing contributions and sacrifices made by Dutch troops in Iraq against ISIS and in NATO’s mission in Afghanistan.  Mr. Sullivan and Mr. van Leeuwen discussed our close cooperation on advanced technologies and cyber security.  They agreed to work together on shared foreign policy priorities, including in regard to China and Russia.  They also discussed the importance of partnership on common global challenges, including climate change.

- February 16, 2021 - Statement by Donald J. Trump, 45th President of the United States of America

 

- February 16, 2021 -

Statement by Donald J. Trump, 45th President of the United States of America

The Republican Party can never again be respected or strong with political “leaders” like Sen. Mitch McConnell at its helm. McConnell’s dedication to business as usual, status quo policies, together with his lack of political insight, wisdom, skill, and personality, has rapidly driven him from Majority Leader to Minority Leader, and it will only get worse. The Democrats and Chuck Schumer play McConnell like a fiddle—they’ve never had it so good—and they want to keep it that way! We know our America First agenda is a winner, not McConnell’s Beltway First agenda or Biden’s America Last.

 

In 2020, I received the most votes of any sitting President in history, almost 75,000,000. Every incumbent House Republican won for the first time in decades, and we flipped 15 seats, almost costing Nancy Pelosi her job. Republicans won majorities in at least 59 of the 98 partisan legislative chambers, and the Democrats failed to flip a single legislative chamber from red to blue. And in “Mitch’s Senate,” over the last two election cycles, I single-handedly saved at least 12 Senate seats, more than eight in the 2020 cycle alone—and then came the Georgia disaster, where we should have won both U.S. Senate seats, but McConnell matched the Democrat offer of $2,000 stimulus checks with $600. How does that work? It became the Democrats’ principal advertisement, and a big winner for them it was. McConnell then put himself, one of the most unpopular politicians in the United States, into the advertisements. Many Republicans in Georgia voted Democrat, or just didn’t vote, because of their anguish at their inept Governor, Brian Kemp, Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, and the Republican Party, for not doing its job on Election Integrity during the 2020 Presidential race.

 

It was a complete election disaster in Georgia, and certain other swing states. McConnell did nothing, and will never do what needs to be done in order to secure a fair and just electoral system into the future. He doesn’t have what it takes, never did, and never will.

 

My only regret is that McConnell “begged” for my strong support and endorsement before the great people of Kentucky in the 2020 election, and I gave it to him. He went from one point down to 20 points up, and won. How quickly he forgets. Without my endorsement, McConnell would have lost, and lost badly. Now, his numbers are lower than ever before, he is destroying the Republican side of the Senate, and in so doing, seriously hurting our Country.

 

Likewise, McConnell has no credibility on China because of his family’s substantial Chinese business holdings. He does nothing on this tremendous economic and military threat.  

 

Mitch is a dour, sullen, and unsmiling political hack, and if Republican Senators are going to stay with him, they will not win again. He will never do what needs to be done, or what is right for our Country. Where necessary and appropriate, I will back primary rivals who espouse Making America Great Again and our policy of America First. We want brilliant, strong, thoughtful, and compassionate leadership. 

 

Prior to the pandemic, we produced the greatest economy and jobs numbers in the history of our Country, and likewise, our economic recovery after Covid was the best in the world. We cut taxes and regulations, rebuilt our military, took care of our Vets, became energy independent, built the wall and stopped the massive inflow of illegals into our Country, and so much more. And now, illegals are pouring in, pipelines are being stopped, taxes will be going up, and we will no longer be energy independent.

 

This is a big moment for our country, and we cannot let it pass by using third rate “leaders” to dictate our future!

 

February 16, 2021 Statement by White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki on Cases of Ebola

 

The White House Logo
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
February 16, 2021

 
Statement by White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki on Cases of Ebola
 
Infectious diseases are transnational health and national security threats. While the world is reeling from the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, Ebola has again emerged, simultaneously, in both Central and West Africa.  The world cannot afford to turn the other way.  We must do everything in our power to respond quickly, effectively, and with commensurate resources to stop these outbreaks before they become largescale epidemics. 
 
President Biden has been briefed on the situation in both Central and West Africa, and his prayers are with the families of those who have died and those who are impacted by Ebola, COVID-19, and other ongoing global health challenges. The Biden Administration will do everything in its power to provide U.S. leadership to stop these outbreaks, working with the affected governments, the World Health Organization, the African Union and the African Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, and neighboring states. 
 
On February 16, National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan spoke with the Ambassadors of Guinea, Democratic Republic of Congo, Sierra Leone, and Liberia to the United States to convey the United States willingness to work closely with the governments of affected countries, and neighboring countries whose citizens would be at risk of the current outbreak spread.  Mr. Sullivan emphasized President Biden’s commitment to provide U.S. leadership to strengthen health security and create better systems for preventing, detecting, and responding to health emergencies.
 
Outbreaks require swift and overwhelming response in order to avoid catastrophic consequences.  Since the 2014 Ebola epidemic in West Africa, the United States has endeavored to elevate and prioritize health security assistance with partners through the Global Health Security Agenda and with strong support from Congress. We cannot afford to take our foot off the gas – even as we battle COVID, we must ensure capacity and financing for health security worldwide.  President Biden’s first National Security Memorandum directed that U.S. leadership in health security and global health be elevated, prioritized, and strengthened. The United States stands ready to do everything in its power to ensure a robust global response and to stop these outbreaks. 

February 16, 2021 The MPP Program and Border Security Joint Statement by Assistant to the President and National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan and Assistant to the President and Homeland Security Advisor and Deputy National Security Advisor Liz Sherwood-Randall

 

The White House Logo
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
February 16, 2021
 
The MPP Program and Border Security
 Joint Statement by Assistant to the President and National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan and Assistant to the President and Homeland Security Advisor and Deputy National Security Advisor Liz Sherwood-Randall
 
Starting February 19, the United States will begin to process eligible individuals in the Migration Protection Protocols (MPP) program to pursue their asylum cases in the US, working closely with the Government of Mexico, as well as international and non-governmental organizations.
 
Individuals should not take any action at this time and should remain where they are to await further instructions. We will soon announce a virtual registration process that will be accessible from any location. 
 
Once registered, eligible individuals will be provided additional information about where and when to present themselves.  Individuals should not approach the border until instructed to do so.
 
We caution people seeking to immigrate to the United States that our borders are not open, and that this is just the first phase in the administration’s work to reopen access to an orderly asylum process. 
 
This new process applies to individuals who were returned to Mexico under the MPP program and have cases pending before the Executive Office for Immigration Review.
 
Individuals outside of the United States who were not returned to Mexico under MPP or who do not have active immigration court cases will not be considered for participation in this first phase of this program and should await further instructions.
 
If you seek entry into the US and do not have an active MPP case, you will be immediately expelled and will not be permitted to remain in the United States.
 
People who attempt to cross the border without going through ports of entry should understand that you are putting yourselves and your families in danger, especially during a global pandemic. 
 
President Biden is committed to immigration reform in the long term, but it will take time. The immigration reform legislation that President Biden sent to the Congress only applies to individuals who were in the United States before January 1, 2021.
 
This is a crucial first step to communicate our respect for human rights and human dignity, which includes abiding by legal processes and health and safety protocols.

February 16, 2021 Declaración conjunta sobre Los Protocolos de Protección de Migrantes (PPM) y la seguridad fronteriza del Asistente del presidente y Consejero de Seguridad Nacional Jake Sullivan y la asistente del presidente y Sub Consejera de Seguridad Nacional Liz Sherwood-Randall.

 

The White House Logo
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
February 16, 2021
 
Declaración conjunta sobre Los Protocolos de Protección de Migrantes (PPM) y la seguridad fronteriza del Asistente del presidente y Consejero de Seguridad Nacional Jake Sullivan y la asistente del presidente y Sub Consejera  de Seguridad Nacional Liz Sherwood-Randall.
 
A partir del 19 de febrero, Estados Unidos comenzará a procesar los casos de las personas elegibles bajo el programa de Protocolos de Protección de Migrantes (PPM) para dar seguimiento a los casos de asilo en los Estados Unidos, en estrecha colaboración con el Gobierno de México, así como con organizaciones internacionales y no gubernamentales.
 
Las personas no deben tomar ninguna medida en este momento y deben permanecer donde están para esperar instrucciones adicionales. Pronto anunciaremos un proceso de registro virtual que estará disponible desde cualquier lugar. Una vez registradas, las personas elegibles recibirán información adicional sobre dónde y cuándo presentarse. Las personas no deben dirigirse a la frontera hasta que se les indique que lo hagan.
 
Advertimos a las personas que buscan emigrar a los Estados Unidos que nuestras fronteras no están abiertas y que esta es solo la primera fase en el trabajo del gobierno de los Estados Unidos para reabrir el acceso a un proceso de asilo ordenado.
 
Este nuevo proceso se aplica a las personas que fueron retornadas a México bajo el programa PPM y tienen casos pendientes ante la Oficina Ejecutiva de Revisión de Inmigración.
 
Las personas fuera de los Estados Unidos que no fueron devueltas a México bajo el PPM o que no tienen casos judiciales de inmigración activos no serán consideradas para participar en esta primera fase de este programa y deben esperar más instrucciones.
 
Si una persona busca ingresar a EE UU., y no se encuentra entre los beneficiados con caso activo bajo el PPM, será expulsado de inmediato y no se le permitirá permanecer en los Estados Unidos.
 
Las personas que intenten cruzar la frontera sin pasar por los puertos de entrada deben comprender que ellos mismos,  e inclusive sus familias, se están poniendo en peligro, especialmente en estos momentos que vivimos una pandemia mundial.
 
El presidente Biden está comprometido con una reforma migratoria a largo plazo, pero esta tomará tiempo. La legislación de reforma migratoria que el presidente Biden envió al Congreso solo se aplica a las personas que han estado en los Estados Unidos antes del 1o de enero de 2021.
 
Este es un primer paso crucial para comunicar nuestro respeto por los derechos humanos y la dignidad humana, que incluye acatar los procesos legales y los protocolos de salud y seguridad.