Wednesday, July 22, 2020

SEVEN NOMINATIONS SENT TO THE SENATE

Office of the Press Secretary
NOMINATIONS SENT TO THE SENATE:

      André Bauer, of South Carolina, to be Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of the United States of America to Belize.
    

     John Gibbs, of Michigan, to be Director of the Office of Personnel Management for a term of four years, vice Dale Cabaniss, resigned.
    

     Daniel Huff, of Massachusetts, to be an Assistant Secretary of Commerce, vice Michael Platt Jr., resigned.
    

     Brian D. McFeeters, of Virginia, a Career Member of the Senior Foreign Service, Class of Minister-Counselor, to be Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of the United States of America to Malaysia.
    

     Matthew Moury, of Maryland, to be a Member of the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board for a term expiring October 18, 2021, vice Joseph Bruce Hamilton, term expired.
    

     Robert E. Primus, of New Jersey, to be a Member of the Surface Transportation Board for a term expiring December 31, 2023, vice Daniel R. Elliott III, resigned.
    

     Sutapa Ghosh Stricklett, of Maryland, to be an Assistant Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development, vice Jonathan Nicholas Stivers.

1600 Daily The White House • July 21, 2020 WATCH LIVE: President Trump Holds News Conference

1600 Daily
The White House • July 21, 2020

WATCH LIVE: President Trump holds news conference


At 5 p.m. ET today, President Trump will hold a news conference from the White House Briefing Room.

Click here to watch President Trump live at 5 p.m. ET

Press Secretary: The violence in Portland must end


“The well-organized mob in Portland has become increasingly aggressive, especially against law enforcement officers,” Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany told reporters during a press briefing this morning.

“Individuals have thrown bricks, chunks of concrete, glass bottles, feces, balloons filled with paint, pigs’ feet, slingshots to hurl ball bearings, and batteries at Federal agents and the courthouse. Multiple attempts to barricade officers in the Hatfield Courthouse have occurred.” The violence has raged on for more than 50 days.

🎬 Press Secretary: Democrats continue to put politics above peace

In response, President Trump deployed federal officers to Portland to protect Federal Government property. He has also repeatedly offered support to state and city leaders to help quell the violence on their streets.

“By any objective standard, the violence, chaos, and anarchy in Portland is unacceptable,” McEnany said. “Yet, Democrats continue to put politics above peace, while this President seeks to restore law and order.”

Portland isn’t alone—in large cities across the country, local leaders are standing down in a failed attempt to placate violent rioters and mobs. Ten people were killed and 60 more wounded in shootings across Chicago this past weekend alone. In New York City, 205 shootings last month marked the most violent June for the city in 24 years.

The pattern is clear. When city leaders turn their backs on policing, our most vulnerable communities pay the price. “Stopping or discouraging the cops from disproportionately policing these neighborhoods isn’t a blow for justice. It’s an obstacle for upstanding, low-income citizens who are trying to lead decent lives,” Rich Lowry wrote on Sunday for the National Review.

“People who live in the affected communities know this and, to their credit, often say it. But their voices don’t get the megaphone of anti-police agitators.”

President Trump will not stand by as American citizens are terrorized by rioters or criminals in any of our cities. In Portland, Democrat leaders complained when the President sent in federal officers to protect federal property. But if mayors and governors refuse to do their jobs to restore peace and safety, President Trump will.

“We’re not going to let this happen in our country,” he told reporters yesterday in the Oval Office. “We’re going to have more federal law enforcement.”

President Trump: For 51 days, they were ripping down that city

🎬 Watch: The police are restricted from doing anything

Photo of the Day

President Trump signs a Presidential Memorandum to exclude illegal aliens from the apportionment base following the 2020 census | July 21, 2020

PRESS BRIEFING BY PRESS SECRETARY KAYLEIGH MCENANY

Office of the Press Secretary
PRESS BRIEFING
BY PRESS SECRETARY KAYLEIGH MCENANY

James S. Brady Press Briefing Room

 
11:16 A.M. EDT

     MS. MCENANY:  Good morning, everyone.  By any objective standard, the violence, chaos, and anarchy in Portland is unacceptable, yet Democrats continue to put politics above peace while this President seeks to restore law and order.

     Governor Kate Brown, a Democrat -- Governor of Oregon -- said that the President should, quote, “stop playing politics,” called law enforcement officers “secret police,” and likened it to, quote, a “dictatorship.”  The governor also called on the president to get his officers off the streets.

     Democrat mayor of Portland, Todd Wheeler, said the President is “trying to look strong for his base” while you had Democrats on the Hill, Nancy Pelosi, calling these officers stormtroopers and Jim Clyburn calling them the Gestapo.

     This rhetoric is unhelpful and gives the violence we have seen a pass.  But President Trump will not give the violence a pass.  He will restore order where the Democrat governor and the Democrat mayor are unwilling to admit that they have lost control of their city.

     The well-organized mob in Portland has become increasingly aggressive, especially against law enforcement officers. Individuals have thrown bricks, chunks of concrete, glass bottles, feces, balloons filled with paint, pig's feet, slingshots to hurl ball bearings and batteries at federal agents and the courthouse.
Multiple attempts to barricade officers in the Hatfield Courthouse have occurred; attempts to start the structure on fire as well.  Use of eyesight-damaging laser devices have been used, and strobe lights against federal agents as well.  But according to Speaker Pelosi, when asked about the violent removal of statues, “people will do what they do.”

     The Trump administration urges state and local officials to work cooperatively to restore law and order.  Operation LeGend is a great example of this.  At the governor's request, we went into Kansas City and surged the area with federal assets -- FBI, DEA, ATF, and U.S. Marshals.  This was named after LeGend Taliferro, a 4-year-old young boy who lost his life and was shot in his bed tragically.

     This has been a successful operation that has been waged in his name, including the arrest of wanted fugitives.  Similarly, President Trump is taking action in Portland, even though you have a Democrat mayor and Democrat governor unwilling to work with us in this situation.  We are surging resources, along with Secretary Wolf at DHS, and augmenting the Federal Protective Service to safeguard federal property.

     The bottom line is that this President stands with law and order, which leads to peace.  And we will not allow Portland to become the new CHOP, like what we saw in Seattle.
And with that, I'll take questions.

     Jon.

     Q    Kayleigh, two questions on Portland.  One, the case of Navy veteran Christopher David, who went down because he said he wanted to talk to the law enforcement officers and ask them about the oath of office that they took.  He was -- as people saw on videotape, he was beaten with a baton.  He had pepper spray sprayed on his face.  He now has two broken bones in his hand.  Is the President aware of what happened to this Navy veteran graduate of the Naval Academy?  And does he condone that kind of action by these law enforcement officers?

     MS. MCENANY:  Yeah, I'm aware of the details of that situation.  I haven't heard the audio of the video, though I've seen it.  And I'd refer you to DHS about the extenuating details.  We always encourage the appropriate use of force, and we always also encourage those in the area to remain peaceful towards our law enforcement officers.

     Q    And my second question is: Where in the Constitution does the President derive the authority to send federal law enforcement officers to the streets of American cities against the will of the elected officials in those cities?

     MS. MCENANY:  Yes, well, what you're referring to is Portland.  And 40 U.S. Code 1315 gives DHS the ability to deputize officers in any department or agency, like ICE, Customs and Border Patrol, and Secret Service.  Quote, “As officers and agents,” they can be deputized for the duty of -- “in connection with the protection of property owned or occupied by the federal government and persons on that property.”  And when a federal courthouse is being lit on fire, commercial fireworks being shot at it, being shot at the officers, I think that that falls pretty well within the limits of 40 U.S. Code 1315.

     Q    So that’s a matter of protecting federal property, like a federal courthouse, in the case of Portland.  Does he see limitations to that power?  How much -- how far does that power extend into the streets of the city of Portland?  How -- you know, what -- are their limitations on that --


     MS. MCENANY:  So, under the --

     Q    -- that authority to protect a federal property?

     MS. MCENANY:  Under the law, we believe that agents can conduct investigations of crimes committed against federal property or federal officers.  And in the case where you have someone shooting off a commercial-grade firework and then running across the street, we don't believe that that extends past our jurisdiction.

     Yes.

     Q    Kayleigh, thank you.  Yesterday, the President tweeted out an image of himself wearing a mask.  He said that wearing a mask is an act of patriotism; no one is more patriotic than him.  Then, just hours later, he was spotted at the Trump Hotel not wearing a mask.  Why did it take him so long, first of all, to be seen wearing a mask in public?  And why the mixed messaging on this critical health issue that his own top health officials have said is critical to fighting this pandemic?

     MS. MCENANY:  The President has always been consistent on this: that masks, according to the CDC, are recommended but not required.  He has said that he would wear one in the case he couldn't appropriately socially distance.  And he wore one and put up the picture on Twitter, as you saw.

     Q    Does he think that it's important to lead by example on this issue?

     MS. MCENANY:  Well, the President has led.  He's been consistent, even going back to March 31st, when he said then, “My feeling is, if people want to do it, there’s certainly no harm to it.”

     Q    But he hasn't done it, Kayleigh.  He hasn’t worn a mask.  And so it’s sending -- is it not mixed signals?

     THE PRESIDENT:  The President wore a mask in May.  The president wore a mask at Walter Reed, out of an abundance of caution.  But as I've made clear from this podium, the President is the most tested man in America.  He's tested more than anyone, multiple times a day.  And we believe that he's acting appropriately.

     Q    Let me ask you about the federal stimulus, if I might.  Negotiations are ongoing.  Why is the White House blocking Republicans’ requests for more funding for testing and contact tracing?  Senator Roy Blunt saying, “It just doesn't make sense. I think that's just wrong.”

     MS. MCENANY:  So, no one is blocking any money from testing.  One of the things I would add is that this is an ongoing negotiation.  We're just in the early days of that.  Currently, in federal coffers, we have $10 billion -- that's with a “B” -- unspent, that is allocated for testing.  And we want to ensure that in phase four there is money that is targeted for testing in the way that makes most sense.

     Q    But Republican says they need that money.  Is the President willing to come to the table (inaudible)?

     MS. MCENANY:  We’re willing to put in money for targeted testing that makes sense, not just dumping money into a pot that already contains $10 billion.

     Yes.

     Q    Kayleigh, there’s very little support in Congress for a payroll tax cut, but the President keeps pushing for it.  Why is that so important to him?  How does a payroll tax cut help the 25 million Americans out of work when they're not getting a paycheck?

     MS. MCENANY:  Well, there are a number of things we're looking at for phase four, and one of those things is unemployment benefits, where as Secretary Mnuchin said, we want this to be completed before July 31st, the date that that runs out.  We don't want something to be an incentive where someone gets overpaid and has a disincentive from going back to work, or they get paid more on unemployment benefits than at work.  So we want to be cautious about that while making sure that those unemployed are taken care of.

     But the payroll tax in particular goes to some of our hardest-working Americans.  The people that it benefits, if you look at the tax structure, are middle-income and low-income workers.  And not only that: There's an incentive on the employer side with a payroll tax holiday that encourages them to hire more too because it reduces their burden.  So it's a very smart policy.

     Q    But those are people who still have jobs.  So wouldn't it be more important to focus on the people who don't, if you're worried about the overall cost of this stimulus?

     MS. MCENANY:  We can focus on a number of things at once, and part of that is a payroll tax for middle and income -- low-income Americans who are out there working each and every day and making their way through as best they can.  It also means unemployment benefits; it also means direct payments to Americans.  So we're looking at all of that, and we would like to see all of that.

     Q    Just a second question on the briefing today at 5 o'clock: Should we expect to see members of the Coronavirus Task Force?  Will Dr. Fauci, will Dr. Birx be there?

     MS. MCENANY:  You'll have to tune in to see.

     Yes.

     Q    Thank you.  On Portland -- on sending agents to Portland, as well as plans for Chicago: Why are these the right people to send?  It’s my understanding these agents often work on human smuggling, drug trafficking, things like that.  Do they have the right skillset, whether it's gun violence in Chicago or quelling unrest in Portland?

     MS. MCENANY:  Well, first let me add, they haven't been sent to Chicago.  These DHS officials are currently in Portland protecting a courthouse.  We do believe they're the right individuals for that, as does 40 U.S.C. 1315, the United States Code.  It's egregious what's happening: the frequency jammers, the pellet and air rifles in Portland.  It's being depicted as this peaceful scene.  I can assure you it's anything but that, where you've had barricades, trying to keep officers in the Hartfield -- Hatfield, excuse me, Courthouse; injury to a Border Patrol team member’s leg; injuries to the head, shoulder, and back of a deputy U.S. Marshal; U.S. Marshal impaled his right hand on a board filled with nails set out by the protesters.

     This is not a peaceful scene.  And I'm very thankful to our U.S. Marshals and ATF and others who are acting in accordance with a statute in protecting a federal building, and doing so at great cost to themselves.

     Yes.

     Q    Thanks, Kayleigh.  I have two questions for you on the stimulus.  First, since you guys are committed to the payroll tax cut, that seems to be driving up the price tag of the whole package.  So does the White House view the $1 trillion figure that's been cited by GOP leaders as a hard cap?  Are you willing to sign something that would spend more than that?

     MS. MCENANY:  These are all preliminary discussions.  So, you know, I'll leave it to the negotiators to decide.  The trillion-dollar number was cited by Secretary Mnuchin yesterday.

     But, look, this is the beginning stages.  We're looking at a number of things.  But the President was very clear that he would like to see a payroll tax in there, along with liability protections, tax credits for businesses to bring people back to work and to have safe work environments, and of course, the $70 billion for schools to reopen safely -- at least $70 billion.

     Q    And then on the testing piece: What did the wait time -- the long wait times that we're seeing for tests around the country suggest that we do need a massive influx of testing beyond what's unspent, and that the federal government should take more control of the federal -- of the country's testing program?

     MS. MCENANY:  So we do want to see more testing funding, but we want it to be targeted in a way that it gets to the right people who need testing at the right time, not just dumping money into a bucket.  So we want more money, and we want it to be targeted.

     But I'm glad you brought up the timing of the testing.  I talked to Dr. Birx, and she's very encouraged by the pool testing that's being worked on.  You can run four to five times as many tests in the same period of time by decreasing turnaround times at a minimum of two thirds.  So if you took three days to get a test result, it goes down to less than one.  If it took six days, it goes down to less than two.  And it's more labor intensive, so they would need to hire additional personnel.  But CMS is funding the test at about four times the actual test cost to ensure technicians and PPE requirements can be met.  So we are seeing encouraging signs on that front.

     Yes.

     Q    Thank you, Kayleigh.  Just going back to the Portland situation: What is, sort of, the policy justification for federal officers not identifying their agency and their arrest authority when they take a protester into custody?

     MS. MCENANY:  So I've been told by DHS that there is insignia indicating that they’re law enforcement.  They, in the case you're referencing, did identify themselves to the individual being obtained, but that they don't identify themselves to crowds because it would put them at great risk, and I think you can see that, as I noted, when they're sticking their hands into boards left out by some of the rioters.

     Yes.

     Q    Hey, Kayleigh.  You know, on June 16th -- so a little more than a month ago -- the White House, via the Vice President, published an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal.  The op-ed said that “the media has tried to scare the American people” about the coronavirus.  It talked about low positivity rates and declining case numbers in half of the states.  There have been 25,000 additional deaths since that was published. Does the White House still stand by that op-ed?

     And then, just more generally, what happened here at the White House and the administration in the last month when the message was that this was a problem that was on the mend and being addressed, until now, with the exploding cases we've seen and 141,000 deaths?

     MS. MCENANY:  Well, the White House has always been very clear-eyed that as we reopened, we would see embers and, in some cases, fires.  We've been very aggressive in addressing that; sent out 19 teams to go to emerging hotspots.  Dr. Birx has been to nine states.  She does a lot of extraordinary work on that front.

     So we've been clear-eyed that as we reopened, we would see embers and sometimes fires.  But we're encouraged that when you look at case fatality, for instance, we're below the European Union, we're below the average of the world, and I think that that speaks to our incredible work with therapeutics and our incredible work with testing: 46 million tests.  The number two in testing in the world is India at 13.79 million.

     Q    Do you still see the main problem, as the op-ed pointed out, as the “media trying to scare the American people” over coronavirus?

     MS. MCENANY:  I think, in many cases, the media has tried to scare the American people.  I think there's been a deficit in reporting about the cost of staying shut down, for instance.

     When you have the fact that the American Cancer Society saying that, during the pandemic, we saw an 80 percent drop in cancer cases being identified, there are real costs to a draconian extended shutdown.  And you never heard the other side of the health equation.  You never heard that mammograms were down by 87 percent and colonoscopies down by 90 percent and drug overdoses going up month after month through the lockdown.

     So it was the right decision to make.  The President saved 3 to 4 million lives, but it's important to note the other side of the health equation about what extended lockdowns do to the American people.

     Yes.

     Q    Yeah, the President says he wants to send these forces to other cities like Chicago, cities where the federal property isn't necessarily under attack.  What are they going to do when they get to Chicago and these other cities with higher crime rates, higher shooting rates, higher murder rates, if the President is worried about that?  What are they going to do?  What are they going to arrest people of -– with?

     MS. MCENANY:  I think you’re getting ahead of the President here.  He’s --

     Q    What federal charges?

     MS. MCENANY:  He's made no announcements as to who's going where.  He's very discouraged by the violence that he's seen in Chicago.  It's why he sent a very strong letter to Mayor Lightfoot offering help, because she's clearly unable to control her streets, and the governor as well, unable to control that area.

     When you see the fact that there were 49 officers who were injured in this egregious video of them being lambasted with rioters with umbrellas shielding from view that they were throwing projectiles, and 49 officers injured.  Not only that: The poor citizenry of Chicago where 12 were murdered this weekend, 70 shot alone.

     It's incredible what we're seeing in Chicago.  He's offered his help, and we encourage the mayor to take it and to be forthright about the situation in her state, much like the governor of Missouri was in working with us on Operation LeGend to protect the people of Missouri.

     Q    But the leaders of these cities don't necessarily want unmarked police officers patrolling their streets the way we’ve seen in Portland, with the premise that they're protecting federal property there.  The leaders in these cities don’t want this, sort of, paramilitary police force.

     MS. MCENANY:   They're offered the assistance of DOJ, as was done, where you've had FBI surge in the case of Operation LeGend.  So when you have, each weekend, more than a dozen people getting shot in your city, perhaps it's time -- more than a dozen killed, I should say, and children -- perhaps it's time to say, "I need the help of the federal government because what I'm doing is simply not working.”  When more people are dying on the streets of Chicago than Afghanistan and Iraq, it's a tragedy.

     Q    What if they don’t say that, though?

     MS. MCENANY:   Yes, Steven.

     Q    Thank you.  Well, I have a question about New York on a similar topic.  Yesterday, President Trump mentioned the spike in violent crime in New York and said, quote, "If the governor is not going to do something about it, we'll do something about it."  And I'm curious if you could explain why he is saying that the governors should do something about it rather than the mayor, and if you could also elaborate on what President Trump would be willing to do.

     MS. MCENANY:  Well, he thinks the mayor and the governors should work together to take control of the streets of New York City where, in some places, we've seen 600 percent surge in violence over last year.  So he thinks they should work together.

     It's ultimately the power of the mayor to enforce and the governor to enforce the police power of their states.  That power rests with them, but they can partner with the federal government in the event that they're unable to control the violence in their cities.  And that's certainly what we've seen from Mayor de Blasio, who seems to have not a hard time criticizing police officers but an awfully hard time controlling the streets of New York City.

     Yes.

     Q    Thanks so much.  I have two questions.  I'm the print pooler for today.  One for myself and one for a colleague who cannot be here because of the social distancing.  Governor Gavin Newsom was one of the few Democratic governors to bring in the National Guard and arm them after the riots and moving in early June, as compared to Seattle, where they didn't arm the National Guard.  The Guard was posted at Los Angeles City Hall as a show of force, and within days, the violence had quelled.  Why not just invoke the Insurrection Act and have a big show of force rather than these more secretive operations?

     MS. MCENANY:  So I'll leave that to the President.  We don’t have secretive operations going on.  It's very clear what's going on in Portland.  It's very clear what's happening in Kansas City.

     But with regard to the Insurrection Act, look, we believe that it should be governors and mayors doing what they have the constitutional power to do.  The police power rests with them.  So it's up to this President whether he ever decides to invoke that, but governors and mayors really need to step it up, particularly in Democrat cities where Democrat streets are out of control.

     Q    And then the one from my colleague.  John Gizzi at Newsmax is asking: What are the President's thoughts on John Kasich supporting Joe Biden and his plans to appear at the convention in Florida?

     MS. MCENANY:  What was that?  I didn't hear the last part.

     Q    John Kasich is supporting Joe Biden, and he plans to attend the convention and support the Democratic Convention.

     MS. MCENANY:  So that would be a question for the campaign.  But this President is quite proud of his record in the Republican Party and quite proud to have the support of 96 percent of the party -- more than any predecessor in the history of the Republican Party.

     Yes.

     Q    Thanks, Kayleigh.  You said earlier that the President was tested multiple times a day.  We knew he was tested daily, but can you elaborate on that?  How many times a day is he tested?

     MS. MCENANY:  He's tested often.  I'm not going to read out exactly how many times he's tested a day, but sometimes it is more than one time a day.

     Yes.

     Q    Yesterday, the President said that when he was previously doing briefings, we had a lot of people watching -- record numbers watching in the history of cable television.  And I was wondering if ratings are factoring into his decision to restart the briefing and if he is the best person to get accurate information about the virus out to the public, given previous statements at briefings, like the speculation that disinfectants inside the body could work as a treatment, which medical experts say is not the case, and claims that the virus will just disappear.

     MS. MCENANY:  Well, the President is the right person to give information to the American people.  He was elected by the American people.  He's been a leader on this.  The fact that we've outproduced on ventilators so much so that we have an extraordinary number in our stockpile, and we're giving ventilators out to the rest of the world; that we lead the world in testing: 46 million tests -- more than that.

     At this point, the fact that he's broken down bureaucracy to get a vaccine into a phase three clinical trial, that because of him, we have remdesivir and convalescent plasma and dexamethasone and other therapeutics, he's the right person to give the information to the American people.  And, boy, does he get the information to a lot of the American people during his briefings, as noted by the ratings, as he himself pointed out.

     Yes.

     Q    The U.S. Trade Representative is planning an additional set of tariffs against Europe in the old dispute about aerospace subsidies.  Has the President committed to impose additional sanctions, considering that Europe would answer with additional sanctions -- tariffs, as well?

     MS. MCENANY:  So, since that's pre-decisional, I won't get ahead of -- on any administration announcements on that front.

     Yes.

     Q    Kayleigh, I have a couple of questions.  The first one is: The President, in the last few hours, tweeted about the concerns about mail-in voting.  So he's obviously concerned about the integrity of the U.S. election and certainly internal sabotage.  But why are we not hearing from the President about fears about external sabotage?

     For example, coming out of the UK today, there is a Parliamentary Committee report that says that Russia influenced the Scottish referendum; there are questions about Brexit.  But we've really not heard the President put the Kremlin on notice with respect to the U.S. election.  Will we hear from him today on that?

     MS. MCENANY:  The President today has put the world on notice that our election systems must be secure.  This is -- under this President, in 2018, he articulated the first full cyber strategy for the United States since 2003.  In 2019, he extended the National Emergency Declaration on Foreign Election Interference.  He routinely engages with Congress on election security, particularly in at least 26 --

     Q    Right.  But we had fresh reports.

     MS. MCENANY:   -- elections, security-specific hearings.  He signed legislation -- $71 million -- and so on and so forth.  And that's quite a contrast to the O Biden [sic] -- the Obama-Biden administration, who when told of meddling in 2016, did nothing.  And, in fact, Susan Rice told the White House cyber team to stand down and, quote, "knock it off" when they floated -- when they floated options to combat Russian cyberattacks.  And even Obama's cyber chief, Michael Daniel, has confirmed the stand-down order.

     Q    The President has been in office now more than three years.  I'm asking what has been done now.  And given these fresh concerns, when are we going to hear from the President on that?

     MS. MCENANY:  So what's been done now -- I just listed off three or four things for you, and I'm happy to go through more.  We can talk about the $71 million --

     Q    You know, actually, I have follow-up question with respect to Russia.

     MS. MCENANY:   -- in legislation on election security.  We can talk about the $15 million for election reform activities. We can talk about legislation making more than $805 million available to states.  And --

     Q    So, Joe Biden put the Kremlin and others on notice.

     MS. MCENANY:  And when it comes to mail-in voting, I would point you to the fact that there’s a Wall Street Journal article just out today, and it talks about the dark omen for November and the absolute catastrophe in New York City that we are a month into the election after the voting, and we still don’t know who the winners are of some of those races.

     And Governor Cuomo decided that he would pre-pay postage for the ballots.  And what that meant was that the Post Office didn’t put a postage stamp noting the date of the ballots.  So as they're collecting these ballots in -- for a month --

     Q    I think this is getting off track.  Let's --

     MS. MCENANY:  You asked me about this, so I'm going to answer.  So, for a month, they've collecting ballots with no postmark date.  And, in fact, what they found is 19 percent of ballots have been rejected in Queens, 28 percent rejected in Brooklyn.

     There are questions about mail -- mass mail-out [sic] voting.

     Q    Yeah, that’s one of (inaudible).  I’m asking about foreign interference.

     MS. MCENANY:  And I know you don’t want to hear them, which is why you talk over me.

     Q    Okay.

     MS. MCENANY:  But I encourage you to read the op-ed.

     Yes.

     Q    Okay, let me just redirect on the China vaccine research.  Russia has interfered --

     MS. MCENANY:  Yes, you’ve gotten two questions, which is more than some of your colleagues.

     Yes.

     Q    Okay, you don’t want to engage.

     Q    Thank you, Kayleigh.  In St. Louis, the McCloskeys have been charged with felonies for waving guns at protesters.  The Missouri Attorney General is vowing to dismiss these charges.  Where does the President stand on this?

     MS. MCENANY:  Yeah, the President -- I asked him about that this morning, and he said it is absolutely absurd what is happening to the McCloskeys.  He noted that this is an extreme abuse of power by the prosecutor and noteworthy that the prosecutor -- there have been many cases brought to her attention of violent rioters that she's failed to charge, but instead she's charging the individuals who were defending themselves from violent protesters.  You have 300 to 500 protesters who stormed the gates, tore down the gates, and trespassed on their property.

     And you have Patricia McCloskey who said that they were telling her they were going to kill them, these protesters, at the moment they were waving their guns to protect themselves.  “They were going to come in here,” she said.  “They were going to burn down the house.  They were going to be living in our house after I was dead and they were pointing to different rooms of the house saying, ‘That's going to be my bedroom.’  ‘That's going to be my living room.’  And ‘I'm going to be taking a shower in that room.’”  So they were completely within their right.  And it's an egregious abuse of power on the part of the McCloskeys.

     Turning to a different note: I just wanted to highlight some -- some great work being done by senior advisor Ivanka Trump.  There are nearly 40 million boxes that have been put together by the Farmers to Family Food Box Program, a great partnership to help families in need in this country.  And yesterday, you had Ivanka Trump visiting the D.C. Dream Center and personally distributing a number of food boxes.  The distribution resulted in 1,000 boxes delivered to the D.C. community.  And we thank Ivanka for the great work that she has done there.

     And finally, I just wanted to note something on COVID.  Dr. Birx is an extraordinary doctor who has served this country, dedicated her time to serving our country as an Army colonel.  She has served as an ambassador to PEPFAR where she spent her life fighting AIDS and HIV abroad.  And it is appalling the attack that I saw on her in the New York Times, based on no facts.

     And Dr. Birx, for weeks, has been sending out this data to governors -- 400 pages of data to our governors -- so that they have the best information to make the best decisions for their people in their respective states.  I've not seen anyone pouring over data the way Dr. Birx has, and the attack on her was, frankly, appalling and egregious, and the New York Times should be very ashamed of themselves.

                              END                 11:42 A.M. EDT

PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP IS TAKING ACTION TO ENSURE AMERICAN CITIZENS RECEIVE PROPER REPRESENTATION IN CONGRESS

Office of the Press Secretary
PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP IS TAKING ACTION TO ENSURE AMERICAN CITIZENS RECEIVE PROPER REPRESENTATION IN CONGRESS 
“We will collect all of the information we need to conduct an accurate census and to make responsible decisions about public policy, voting rights, and representation in Congress.” – President Donald J. Trump
PROTECTING AMERICAN DEMOCRACY: President Donald J. Trump is taking action to prevent illegal aliens from being counted in the 2020 census for the purpose of apportionment.
  • President Trump is issuing a memorandum clarifying that illegal aliens are not to be included for the purpose of apportionment of Representatives following the 2020 census.
  • This follows the President’s order directing the Federal government to collect the information needed to ensure that accurate citizenship data is compiled in connection with the census.
  • Giving congressional representation and political influence to illegal aliens – people who have blatantly disregarded our laws – would be a perversion of our democratic principles.
  • Allowing illegal aliens to be counted for the purpose of apportionment could also create perverse incentives – such as potentially rewarding states that encourage violations of Federal immigration law – that would undermine our system of government.
  • President Trump will never allow our democracy to be eroded by giving congressional representation to illegal aliens when the Constitution does not require it.
UPHOLDING CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLES: Excluding illegal aliens for the purpose of apportionment reflects a better understanding of our Constitution and democratic principles.
  • The Constitution does not specifically define which persons must be included for the purposes of apportionment and requires only that Representatives be apportioned according to what has long been understood to mean the “inhabitants” of each State.
  • Under the law, Congress and the President are required to make judgments concerning which persons should be considered inhabitants of a State for the purpose of apportionment.
    • For example, people only temporarily in the United States, such as those only in the country for business or tourism, have long been excluded from this count.
    • Likewise, overseas military and other Federal personnel have at times been included in and excluded from the populations of states where they maintain homes of record.
  • As the Supreme Court recognized in Franklin v. Massachusetts, inclusion in the apportionment base may require “more than mere physical presence,” including “some element of allegiance or enduring tie to a place.”
  • Failure to exclude illegal immigrants for the purposes of apportionment would have major ramifications and could cause some American citizens to be proportionally underrepresented.
    • Estimates suggest that one State – home to more than 2.2 million illegal aliens – could receive two or three more congressional seats than would otherwise be allocated.
PRIORITIZING AMERICANS: President Trump is always working to put American citizens first.
  • After years of neglect, President Trump is restoring the rule of law, securing our border, and protecting our Nation’s communities.
  • The President is reversing disastrous trade deals that shipped our jobs overseas and is replacing them with better deals, like the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement.
  • To give American workers first priority in our coronavirus recovery, the President has extended and expanded the suspension of certain visas through the end of the year.
  • The President is also ensuring that immigrants to our country are self-sufficient and do not strain American’s public welfare or healthcare systems.

Statement from the President Regarding Apportionment

Office of the Press Secretary
Statement from the President Regarding Apportionment
 
Last summer in the Rose Garden, I told the American people that I would not back down in my effort to determine the citizenship status of the United States population.  Today, I am following through on that commitment by directing the Secretary of Commerce to exclude illegal aliens from the apportionment base following the 2020 census.

There used to be a time when you could proudly declare, “I am a citizen of the United States.”  But now, the radical left is trying to erase the existence of this concept and conceal the number of illegal aliens in our country.  This is all part of a broader left-wing effort to erode the rights of Americans citizens, and I will not stand for it.
 
Today’s action to exclude illegal aliens from the apportionment base reflects a better understanding of the Constitution and is consistent with the principles of our representative democracy.  My Administration will not support giving congressional representation to aliens who enter or remain in the country unlawfully, because doing so would create perverse incentives and undermine our system of government.  Just as we do not give political power to people who are here temporarily, we should not give political power to people who should not be here at all.

Under an Executive Order I signed last year, Federal departments and agencies have been collecting the information needed to conduct an accurate census and inform responsible decisions about public policy, voting rights, and representation in Congress.  Today’s action further advances this effort and is another example of my Administration’s commitment to faithfully representing the citizens of the United States and putting their interests first.

Memorandum on Excluding Illegal Aliens From the Apportionment Base Following the 2020 Census

Office of the Press Secretary
July 21, 2020





 
MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY OF COMMERCE

SUBJECT:       Excluding Illegal Aliens From the Apportionment
               Base Following the 2020 Census


By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows:

     Section 1.  Background.  In order to apportion Representatives among the States, the Constitution requires the enumeration of the population of the United States every 10 years and grants the Congress the power and discretion to direct the manner in which this decennial census is conducted (U.S. Const. art. I, sec. 2, cl. 3).  The Congress has charged the Secretary of Commerce (the Secretary) with directing the conduct of the decennial census in such form and content as the Secretary may determine (13 U.S.C. 141(a)).  By the direction of the Congress, the Secretary then transmits to the President the report of his tabulation of total population for the apportionment of Representatives in the Congress (13 U.S.C. 141(b)).  The President, by law, makes the final determination regarding the "whole number of persons in each State," which determines the number of Representatives to be apportioned to each State, and transmits these determinations and accompanying census data to the Congress (2 U.S.C. 2a(a)).  The Congress has provided that it is "the President's personal transmittal of the report to Congress" that "settles the apportionment" of Representatives among the States, and the President's discretion to settle the apportionment is more than "ceremonial or ministerial" and is essential "to the integrity of the process" (Franklin v. Massachusetts, 505 U.S. 788, 799, and 800 (1992)).

     The Constitution does not specifically define which persons must be included in the apportionment base.  Although the Constitution requires the "persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed," to be enumerated in the census, that requirement has never been understood to include in the apportionment base every individual physically present within a State's boundaries at the time of the census.  Instead, the term "persons in each State" has been interpreted to mean that only the "inhabitants" of each State should be included.  Determining which persons should be considered "inhabitants" for the purpose of apportionment requires the exercise of judgment.  For example, aliens who are only temporarily in the United States, such as for business or tourism, and certain foreign diplomatic personnel are "persons" who have been excluded from the apportionment base in past censuses.  Conversely, the Constitution also has never been understood to exclude every person who is not physically "in" a State at the time of the census.  For example, overseas Federal personnel have, at various times, been included in and excluded from the populations of the States in which they maintained their homes of record.  The discretion delegated to the executive branch to determine who qualifies as an "inhabitant" includes authority to exclude from the apportionment base aliens who are not in a lawful immigration status.

     In Executive Order 13880 of July 11, 2019 (Collecting Information About Citizenship Status in Connection With the Decennial Census), I instructed executive departments and agencies to share information with the Department of Commerce, to the extent permissible and consistent with law, to allow the Secretary to obtain accurate data on the number of citizens, non-citizens, and illegal aliens in the country.  As the Attorney General and I explained at the time that order was signed, data on illegal aliens could be relevant for the purpose of conducting the apportionment, and we intended to examine that issue.

     Sec. 2.  Policy.  For the purpose of the reapportionment of Representatives following the 2020 census, it is the policy of the United States to exclude from the apportionment base aliens who are not in a lawful immigration status under the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), to the maximum extent feasible and consistent with the discretion delegated to the executive branch.  Excluding these illegal aliens from the apportionment base is more consonant with the principles of representative democracy underpinning our system of Government.  Affording congressional representation, and therefore formal political influence, to States on account of the presence within their borders of aliens who have not followed the steps to secure a lawful immigration status under our laws undermines those principles.  Many of these aliens entered the country illegally in the first place.  Increasing congressional representation based on the presence of aliens who are not in a lawful immigration status would also create perverse incentives encouraging violations of Federal law.  States adopting policies that encourage illegal aliens to enter this country and that hobble Federal efforts to enforce the immigration laws passed by the Congress should not be rewarded with greater representation in the House of Representatives.  Current estimates suggest that one State is home to more than 2.2 million illegal aliens, constituting more than 6 percent of the State's entire population.  Including these illegal aliens in the population of the State for the purpose of apportionment could result in the allocation of two or three more congressional seats than would otherwise be allocated.

     I have accordingly determined that respect for the law and protection of the integrity of the democratic process warrant the exclusion of illegal aliens from the apportionment base, to the extent feasible and to the maximum extent of the President's discretion under the law.

     Sec. 3.  Excluding Illegal Aliens from the Apportionment Base.  In preparing his report to the President under section 141(b) of title 13, United States Code, the Secretary shall take all appropriate action, consistent with the Constitution and other applicable law, to provide information permitting the President, to the extent practicable, to exercise the President's discretion to carry out the policy set forth in section 2 of this memorandum.  The Secretary shall also include in that report information tabulated according to the methodology set forth in Final 2020 Census Residence Criteria and Residence Situations, 83 Fed. Reg. 5525 (Feb. 8, 2018).

     Sec. 4.  General Provisions.  (a)  Nothing in this memorandum shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

          (i)   the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

          (ii)  the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

     (b)  This memorandum shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

     (c)  This memorandum is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

 

                              DONALD J. TRUMP

West Wing Reads ‘Shootings and Other Crimes Spike in the Poorest Neighborhoods When Cops Pull Back’

West Wing Reads

‘Shootings and Other Crimes Spike in the Poorest Neighborhoods When Cops Pull Back’


“If there’s one lesson from the unrest and anti-police agitation in the wake of the killing of George Floyd, it’s that poor minorities living in distressed neighborhoods pay the highest price—in fear and in blood—when the cops retreat and the worst elements feel emboldened,” Rich Lowry writes in National Review.

“The spikes in shootings in cities around the country haven’t taken place in high-end neighborhoods . . . No, they blight the most marginal neighborhoods and make everyday life a hazard for people who have no option but to live in a tough place.”

Click here to read more.
“A simple, additional runway at the Taos, New Mexico, airport took more than 20 years to complete because of the permitting and approval process . . . The future of our country’s economy depends, in no small part, upon federal departments and agencies taking a hard look at their regulatory agendas,” Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao writes in The Detroit News.
“Anarchists and rioters have wreaked havoc on Portland, Ore., for nearly two months. Democrats have excused and emboldened them, and they’re now claiming the real problem is that federal law enforcement has intervened to restore order . . . If radicals feel emboldened, that’s because Portland has long allowed political violence to occur with impunity,” The Wall Street Journal editorial board writes. 
“After many decades of a trade policy dominated by geopolitics and the blind pursuit of efficiency, the United States now has a new worker-focused trade policy . . . Some bitter-enders will continue to argue that we should just let the jobs go and then attempt to glue the pieces of society back together again. Fortunately, the country as a whole has moved on and will be stronger for it,” U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer writes in Foreign Affairs.

President Donald J. Trump to Award the Medal of Freedom Jim Ryun

Office of the Press Secretary
President Donald J. Trump to Award the Medal of Freedom
Jim Ryun
This week, President Donald J. Trump will award the Presidential Medal of Freedom to Jim Ryun. This prestigious award is the Nation’s highest civilian honor, which may be awarded by the President to individuals who have made especially meritorious contributions to the security or national interests of the United States, to world peace, or to cultural or other significant public or private endeavors.

Jim Ryun is one of the most accomplished American runners in history and a former United States Representative from Kansas. Despite being cut from every athletic team in junior high, Ryun made the track team at Wichita East High School, where he went on to break the world record for the mile and compete in the 1964 Olympic Games. While at the University of Kansas, Ryun broke several more world records, won the silver medal at the 1968 Mexico City Games, and competed in the 1972 Munich Games. Among many other accolades, he was named ABC Wide World of Sports Athlete of the Year and earned the James E. Sullivan Amateur Athlete Award. Following his outstanding athletic career, Ryun honorably served his home State of Kansas in the United States Congress from 1996 to 2006. He has since written three books and currently gives motivational speeches around the country.